Misplaced Pages

User talk:Giano II: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:10, 1 December 2008 editSDJ (talk | contribs)4,730 edits →Blocked for violation of civility parole: concur← Previous edit Revision as of 23:11, 1 December 2008 edit undoWJBscribe (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users40,293 editsm ceNext edit →
Line 50: Line 50:
::::Yup, that is it. So what is needed is the diff to that discussion and written permission. ] (]) 23:03, 1 December 2008 (UTC) ::::Yup, that is it. So what is needed is the diff to that discussion and written permission. ] (]) 23:03, 1 December 2008 (UTC)


If Jimbo really did accuse Giano of involvement in an outing campaign on Misplaced Pages Review - something for which I have never seen any evidence for, then I think his response is understandable and the use of his civility parole to silence him inappropriate. I also agree with LessHeard, could you confirm that the committee is endorsing your block. Ideally this would have been done by a vote on Wiki, though I suppose it may have happened on the list. Which Arbs support this block? <strong style="font-variant:small-caps">] ]</strong> 23:07, 1 December 2008 (UTC) If Jimbo really did accuse Giano of involvement in an outing campaign on Misplaced Pages Review - something for which I have never seen any evidence, then I think Giano's response is understandable and the use of his civility parole to silence him inappropriate. I also agree with LessHeard, could you confirm that the committee is endorsing your block. Ideally this would have been done by a vote on Wiki, though I suppose it may have happened on the list. Which Arbs support this block? <strong style="font-variant:small-caps">] ]</strong> 23:07, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
*I was just dropping by to post the same, nearly verbatim. It would be difficult to remain civil in the face of an accusation of "outing" another editor. This block seems wrongheaded to me, especially given the fact that Giano has apparently washed his hands of the project. <small><sup>''S.''</sup></small><small><sub>''D.''</sub></small>'''D.J.'''] 23:10, 1 December 2008 (UTC) *I was just dropping by to post the same, nearly verbatim. It would be difficult to remain civil in the face of an accusation of "outing" another editor. This block seems wrongheaded to me, especially given the fact that Giano has apparently washed his hands of the project. <small><sup>''S.''</sup></small><small><sub>''D.''</sub></small>'''D.J.'''] 23:10, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:11, 1 December 2008

He has a dream


This editor believes it is wrong that Misplaced Pages is policed from an external Admin's channel over which it has no control.


Police Misplaced Pages from Misplaced Pages



File:Animalibrí.gif

Old messages are at:

Essays:


Interesting diffs

Just in case any of you were stupid enough to think that the Ombudsmen was there to protect your privacy "I'm reminded of the characters in Solzhenitsyn's novels."

Please do not leave new messages below

Gone! Giano (talk) 22:44, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

Blocked for violation of civility parole

Giano, you are once again in violation of your civility parole. Your comments here were unacceptable. As such, I have blocked you for 55 hours, not only for this violation of your parole, but the other violations that were pointed out to you by FT2 here. Please use this time to take a break, and come back with the high quality contributions we know you are capable of. --Deskana (talk) 22:48, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

I apologise for leaving this comment here, contrary to the above request. I'd clicked "New section" before you'd posted it. --Deskana (talk) 22:50, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
Um, can you link to the written permission required by ArbCom - per the SlimVirgin finding (I shall find a diff in a moment). LessHeard vanU (talk) 22:58, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
Here. And he voted for it, so I'd assume he'd be aware. 96.15.152.244 (talk) 23:01, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
Yup, that is it. So what is needed is the diff to that discussion and written permission. LessHeard vanU (talk) 23:03, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

If Jimbo really did accuse Giano of involvement in an outing campaign on Misplaced Pages Review - something for which I have never seen any evidence, then I think Giano's response is understandable and the use of his civility parole to silence him inappropriate. I also agree with LessHeard, could you confirm that the committee is endorsing your block. Ideally this would have been done by a vote on Wiki, though I suppose it may have happened on the list. Which Arbs support this block? WJBscribe (talk) 23:07, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

  • I was just dropping by to post the same, nearly verbatim. It would be difficult to remain civil in the face of an accusation of "outing" another editor. This block seems wrongheaded to me, especially given the fact that Giano has apparently washed his hands of the project. D.D.J.Jameson 23:10, 1 December 2008 (UTC)