| Revision as of 02:41, 12 February 2008 editBetacommandBot (talk | contribs)931,490 edits notifing user of invalid Fair Use claim WP:NONFREE← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 08:20, 2 December 2008 edit undoCoredesat (talk | contribs)22,795 editsm redirect | ||
| (71 intermediate revisions by 38 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| #REDIRECT ] | |||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | |||
| |maxarchivesize = 50K | |||
| |counter = 15 | |||
| |algo = old(5d) | |||
| |archive = User talk:Coredesat/Archive %(counter)d | |||
| }} | |||
| {{administrator|tan}} | |||
| {{User:Coredesat/Modified usertalk}} | |||
| == WP:METEO Active members == | |||
| {{User:Juliancolton/Active}} | |||
| == ED on userpage == | |||
| My ED arguments on my userpage ] have been deleted. I would like my userpage restored, as I believe it was deleted without anyone reading the actual contents - the page was designed to host meta-arguments, not a copy of the controversial article itself. By deleting meta-arguments, you are saying that WP is effectively stifling any possible debate on this subject. Again, please restore this page. ] (]) 15:23, 6 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Tornado outbreak naming == | |||
| When you get a chance can you give your opinion on ]. One of the admins moved it saying it should not be capitalized. ---]<sup>]</sup><sup>]</sup> 17:46, 6 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Deletion of TeXTree == | |||
| Please explain why you considered the page TeXTree patent Nonsense and deleted it ignoring the hangon tag. It certainly wasn't giberish. The page clearly wasn't very useful *yet* but I wonder how a page can become useful if it is deleted 5 minutes after one starts editing it. | |||
| ] (]) 19:21, 7 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Hi == | |||
| <div style="border-style:solid; border-color:blue; background-color:AliceBlue; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">] | |||
| ] has smiled at you! Smiles promote ] and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing! <br /> <small>''Smile at others by adding {{tls|Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.''</small> | |||
| </div><!-- Template:smile --> | |||
| == Old English Terrier == | |||
| I am not exactly sure why the Old English Terrier article keeps getting redirected to the White English Terrier article. The White English Terrier is a terrier breed that was created in the late 1800's while the Old English Terrier was created in the 1700's. The Old English Terrier was crossed with the Old English Bulldog to create most of today's Bull Terrier breeds. The fact that most of the Bull Terrier breeds are far older than the White English Terrier should give enough pause so that one can understand and grasp that a dog create over a century later cannot be the foundation stock of much older breeds. | |||
| It is my hope that objective and educational reasoning will prevail concerning the Old English Terrier vs. the English White Terrier. They are not the same breed and they never have been. ] (]) 17:50, 9 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == general slocum fire == | |||
| am not sure if this is correct site, though I wish to be directed to list of slocum fire victims as I found out | |||
| recently that my relatives were on the ship. It would help immensely with my geneology chart I am presently working on. | |||
| I was at slocum fire site and her I am. sorry if this is off subject.---Gloriana <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 16:44, 10 February 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| ==Retarded Animal Babies== | |||
| A blast from the past this; currently it's a protected title. You closed ] (back in October 2006, how time flies). Because I'd commented I was left a note to say that there's a new version at ]. I have to say that the new version looks substantially similar to me and doesn't really address the references issue. Cheers, ] ] 21:19, 11 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==Requesting restoration of a page you voted to delete== | |||
| Sir: I have rewritten the page on ]. My version meets all the requirements of Misplaced Pages. It includes reliable third-party citations and proper formatting and NPOV. Since there are now a number of Misplaced Pages articles that link to it, I feel that it should be remade. | |||
| The rewritten article is temporarily posted here: | |||
| http://en.wikipedia.org/User:Hamsterdunce/sandbox | |||
| I have only a secondary relationship with the RAB creator. This is being done as a courtesy to him--we feel that he deserves a decent representation on Misplaced Pages. Your assistance would be greatly appreciated. ] (]) 20:59, 11 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Vincent.jpg== | |||
| Thanks for uploading ''']'''. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at ] carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at ] is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. | |||
| If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our ]. If you have any questions please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:No fair -->] (]) 02:41, 12 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 08:20, 2 December 2008
Redirect to: