| Revision as of 04:48, 4 December 2008 editMustafa Kemal Atatürk (talk | contribs)61 edits →Wrong warning and huggle← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:52, 4 December 2008 edit undoCaspian blue (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers35,434 edits →Wrong warning and huggleNext edit → | ||
| Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
| :::::::: and your last edit is clearly wrong because you blatantly disregards consensus and even breached 3RR violation regardless of the warning. Your meatpupetry accusation also constitutes ]. Then {{User|Lazylaces}} should be your meatpuppet because he reverted to your version of the article. What an absurd and malicious gambit.--] 04:42, 4 December 2008 (UTC) | :::::::: and your last edit is clearly wrong because you blatantly disregards consensus and even breached 3RR violation regardless of the warning. Your meatpupetry accusation also constitutes ]. Then {{User|Lazylaces}} should be your meatpuppet because he reverted to your version of the article. What an absurd and malicious gambit.--] 04:42, 4 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
| :::::::::: you are clearly on kuebie's side. he received a "note" from you, telling him to get away from the article to avoid being blocked. you later posted above "you gave the wrong warning to the wrong user". you are clearly with kuebie.] (]) 04:48, 4 December 2008 (UTC) | :::::::::: you are clearly on kuebie's side. he received a "note" from you, telling him to get away from the article to avoid being blocked. you later posted above "you gave the wrong warning to the wrong user". you are clearly with kuebie.] (]) 04:48, 4 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
| :::::::::::Because he is not a '''NEWBIE''' like you. Misplaced Pages has a guide that "do not template regulars". Instead, you deliberately inserted the original research, and you even insulted my ENGLISH and made the THREAT. All are outrageous. --] 04:52, 4 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 04:52, 4 December 2008
| This is Lazylaces's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: Index, 1Auto-archiving period: 3 days  |
AfD warning
Prod warning
Thank you (userpage)
Thanks for reverting the vandalism from my user page! We should block that IP (I'm not an admin though). Vernon (Versus22) (talk) 22:04, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
Hello Lazylaces, thanks for reverting vandalism on my userpage (I thought it better to post this under the heading in place, due to it being the same subject, rather than make a new one) Thanks again, ] (] · ])☺ 08:15, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
I do not know them personally, and I do not think I have dealt with them before. So nothing springs to mind, but going on that they blanked it once, then replaced it with something like "have you got a fetish for the police", its probably the case that they just have a personal hatred for the police, which I can easily believe considering the vandalism seen on a day-to-day basis on the articles police and police officer. ] (] · ])☺ 14:26, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
São Paulo
The picture of the Pinheiros River and Bridge Otávio Farias shows a section of the city, instead of showing some urban fabric or image characteristics of Sao Paulo. The assembly, which is in the Brazilian article of Sao Paulo, summarizes the city in a few photos.
I didn't vandalism. Excuse me if I was aggressive. And sorry me by bad English! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.162.232.151 (talk) 20:51, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
WQA
Hi, you have started filing a WP:WQA report, but it is not complete, and does not discuss the issue at all. Please return and complete the report as per directions at the top of the WQA page. ►BMW◄ 22:50, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
ucla
why do you keep deleting my changes to the establishment of ucla? i have researched the topic at great length and it seems pretty clear that 1881, is the correct date, given that the state normal school was changed to the southern branch of the UC. please compare this history of Ariz State, SDSU, SJSU, SFSU and chico state, and you will see they are all former normal schools and trace their establishment to the creation of the normal school. same thing should be true with ucla. also, take a look at the history of the outlook, the forerunner of the daily bruin; and the history of the ucla's graduate school of education - both trace their roots to the los angeles state normal school
regards,anderskw Anderskw (talk) 00:22, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
Wrong warning and huggle
Thank you for fighting against vandalism, but before reverting articles, would you check its history first? You gave a wrong warning to a wrong user.--Caspian blue 02:05, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
- caspian blue is wrong, i stripped my addition to the article of original research and redid the whole thing to not copy directly from the source.Mustafa Kemal Atatürk (talk) 02:07, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
- So, you're admitting you deliberately put the "original research".--Caspian blue 02:11, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
- To Lazylaces, there were edit warring right after the above newbie inserted "original research materials" to the article. Another editor, named Kubie deleted them for the reason, and Mustafa kept putting back. And you falsely gave Kubie a warning for vandalism. If you don't understand contents, do not falsely accuse editors with wrong warnings. Regards.--Caspian blue 02:14, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
- Caspian blue is lying. i reworked my edit but kuebie reverted it again for no reason. Caspian blue then acted as a meatpuppet for kuebie, deliberately reverting my edit once so kuebie could revert me again, and appear to have the same amount of reverts as me.Mustafa Kemal Atatürk (talk) 03:14, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
- What you're doing is WP:DISHONESTY, WP:INCIVILITY and WP:Harassment. The person who deliberately inserted the original research is already proven a disruptive editor. You knew you're putting original research, and then made disruption to the article. Your edit looks wrong, so I reverted the article. You violated 3RR and even made a threat. Shame on you.--Caspian blue 03:27, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
- you know what, ill just let them look at my talk page and decide. Caspain blue has been blocked multiple times for 3RR and has even been reprimanded in the past for giving a false and innapropiate warning. That has no bearing on the content of course, but it demonstrates his attitude in solving disputes.Mustafa Kemal Atatürk (talk) 04:03, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
- You know what, you're a clearly not a newbie but somebody who just wants to disrupt Misplaced Pages. I have not been blocked for 3RR violation, so don't lie. You intentionally inseted original research which should not be tolerate for the Encyclopedia. Your threat and incivility constitutes harassment.--Caspian blue 04:10, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
- Caspian blue has a history of 3RR and "gaming the system", and secondly, i cleared all original research on my second revert on the article, there was nothing wrong with my last edit.Mustafa Kemal Atatürk (talk) 04:29, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
- This in-dept-Wiki-knowledge newbie, Mustafa Kemal Atatürk clearly is gaming the system to cover up his wrongdoings and your last edit is clearly wrong because you blatantly disregards consensus and even breached 3RR violation regardless of the warning. Your meatpupetry accusation also constitutes WP:Harassment. Then Lazylaces (talk · contribs) should be your meatpuppet because he reverted to your version of the article. What an absurd and malicious gambit.--Caspian blue 04:42, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
- you are clearly on kuebie's side. he received a "note" from you, telling him to get away from the article to avoid being blocked. you later posted above "you gave the wrong warning to the wrong user". you are clearly with kuebie.Mustafa Kemal Atatürk (talk) 04:48, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
- Because he is not a NEWBIE like you. Misplaced Pages has a guide that "do not template regulars". Instead, you deliberately inserted the original research, and you even insulted my ENGLISH and made the THREAT. All are outrageous. --Caspian blue 04:52, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
- you are clearly on kuebie's side. he received a "note" from you, telling him to get away from the article to avoid being blocked. you later posted above "you gave the wrong warning to the wrong user". you are clearly with kuebie.Mustafa Kemal Atatürk (talk) 04:48, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
- This in-dept-Wiki-knowledge newbie, Mustafa Kemal Atatürk clearly is gaming the system to cover up his wrongdoings and your last edit is clearly wrong because you blatantly disregards consensus and even breached 3RR violation regardless of the warning. Your meatpupetry accusation also constitutes WP:Harassment. Then Lazylaces (talk · contribs) should be your meatpuppet because he reverted to your version of the article. What an absurd and malicious gambit.--Caspian blue 04:42, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
- Caspian blue has a history of 3RR and "gaming the system", and secondly, i cleared all original research on my second revert on the article, there was nothing wrong with my last edit.Mustafa Kemal Atatürk (talk) 04:29, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
- You know what, you're a clearly not a newbie but somebody who just wants to disrupt Misplaced Pages. I have not been blocked for 3RR violation, so don't lie. You intentionally inseted original research which should not be tolerate for the Encyclopedia. Your threat and incivility constitutes harassment.--Caspian blue 04:10, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
- you know what, ill just let them look at my talk page and decide. Caspain blue has been blocked multiple times for 3RR and has even been reprimanded in the past for giving a false and innapropiate warning. That has no bearing on the content of course, but it demonstrates his attitude in solving disputes.Mustafa Kemal Atatürk (talk) 04:03, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
- What you're doing is WP:DISHONESTY, WP:INCIVILITY and WP:Harassment. The person who deliberately inserted the original research is already proven a disruptive editor. You knew you're putting original research, and then made disruption to the article. Your edit looks wrong, so I reverted the article. You violated 3RR and even made a threat. Shame on you.--Caspian blue 03:27, 4 December 2008 (UTC)