| Revision as of 01:17, 5 December 2008 editThemfromspace (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers29,409 edits →December 2008← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:50, 5 December 2008 edit undoShannon Rose (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users984 edits →December 2008: 3RRNext edit → | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| ] Hey! I'm not emphasizing my own opinions on this article, I am modifying it because this is UNTRUTHFULNESS! ](UTC) | ] Hey! I'm not emphasizing my own opinions on this article, I am modifying it because this is UNTRUTHFULNESS! ](UTC) | ||
| :The threshold for inclusion is ]. If you have reliable, independant third-party sources to back up your claims then cite them, but as of now you are deleting well-cited material and replacing it with unverified ]. ] (]) 01:17, 5 December 2008 (UTC) | :The threshold for inclusion is ]. If you have reliable, independant third-party sources to back up your claims then cite them, but as of now you are deleting well-cited material and replacing it with unverified ]. ] (]) 01:17, 5 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
| ] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]{{#if:Eli Soriano|  according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, '''you may be ] from editing'''. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. If necessary, pursue ]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> – ] (]) 19:50, 5 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:50, 5 December 2008
December 2008
Welcome to Misplaced Pages. The recent edit you made to Eliseo Soriano has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Ollie Fury Contribs 20:44, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Misplaced Pages articles. Doing so violates Misplaced Pages's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Themfromspace (talk) 21:08, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to violate Misplaced Pages's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did to Eliseo Soriano, you will be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. DanielRigal (talk) 00:54, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
Hey! I'm not emphasizing my own opinions on this article, I am modifying it because this is UNTRUTHFULNESS! ](UTC)
- The threshold for inclusion is verifiability, not truth. If you have reliable, independant third-party sources to back up your claims then cite them, but as of now you are deleting well-cited material and replacing it with unverified original research. Themfromspace (talk) 01:17, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Eli Soriano. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. – Shannon Rose (talk) 19:50, 5 December 2008 (UTC)