Misplaced Pages

User talk:Matt57: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:07, 9 December 2008 editPeripitus (talk | contribs)38,440 edits Muhammad and slavery: new section← Previous edit Revision as of 15:33, 13 December 2008 edit undoLessHeard vanU (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users33,604 edits Giano's talkpage: new sectionNext edit →
Line 109: Line 109:


Hi Matt57 - you are welcome to do as you will with this article. I've only reverted and semi-protected it to keep the edit's of a ] off the site. I don't have an opinion on either the subject matter or the article. Happy Editing - ] ] 21:07, 9 December 2008 (UTC) Hi Matt57 - you are welcome to do as you will with this article. I've only reverted and semi-protected it to keep the edit's of a ] off the site. I don't have an opinion on either the subject matter or the article. Happy Editing - ] ] 21:07, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

== Giano's talkpage ==

Users are permitted to remove content, except sockpuppet templates, from their talkpages for whatever reason; your re-instatement is contrary to good faith editing, and I would urge you to self revert (if not too late). ] (]) 15:33, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:33, 13 December 2008

Archiving icon
Archives


This page has archives. Sections older than 21 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Organization of British ex-Muslims

=======

Please listen to this video: http://youtube.com/watch?v=XUTFcgE1F7w

My name is Rob. I work for the ugly fish brigade. My number is 613-276-2139

Please tell the person who called me to watch this video.

Thanks - Rob. The ugly fish brigade. Protecting freedom in Canada.

========

The organization has 25 founding members and an unknown number of additional members. It is not significant enough to warrant a section on the Islam in the United Kingdom page. If you were to add a section for every group with so few members or impact on the general British Muslim population the article would be endless.

If such a section is added to the Islam in the United Kingdom article then equally sections on apostacy, scularism and athiesm added to the British Jews article and Church of England article. Please do not try to threaten me or taint the Misplaced Pages project with your Athiest extremist point of view.

Articles that are counterparts on the same subject such as Religion do matter. Misplaced Pages cannot be seen to be or actually be bias as it will destory the credibility of the whole project. While this organization has been heralded in the media its impact on the actual British Muslim community has been neglible as its numbers suggest. The Sufi Muslim Council also is notable but it does not have its own section and is only mentioned in the Political organisations and pressure groups section. Feel free to add the Organization of British ex-Muslims to the latter section.

I do not have the verifiable data or information on apostacy, scularism and athiesm in the Jewish and Christian communities of Britain and would not attempt to make the needed and factual changes without doing so.

Abuse of Power

http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Special:Log/delete&page=Edina_Lekovic

Cartoons

Rather than blame the cartoonist, we need to blame the Muslims who have killed because of the cartoon. They are the real criminals, not the cartoonist. We need to blame the Radical Despot Leaders who insite this violence. They are the true masterminds of human rights abuse. This is the Canadian Way. (Robin, Canada)

The goal of Radical Islam is to censor the press. It looks like our Human Rights Tribunals are helping them to achieve their aims.

By behaving like Bullies, and Spoiled Brats. By throwing tantrums at every perceived offense, (a riot here, a car bomb there) they are causing our own institutions turn against their own citizens, and are actually HELPING the Taliban and Al-Qaeda to suppress our freedom of speech.

Rather than blame the cartoonist, we need to blame the Muslims who have killed because of the cartoon. They are the real criminals, not the cartoonist. We need to blame the Radical Despot Leaders who insite this violence. They are the true masterminds of human rights abuse.

Rather than cower away, we need to STAND UP TO THESE BULLIES and say: "Look. We are not afraid of you. We are not babies like you, crying over cartoons. We will say anything we wish, and you will never cause us to shut our mouths."

This is the Canadian way.

Sincerely, Robin, Canada

Thanks!

StaticGull  Talk  has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

November 2008

Please read the Michael Jackson talk page, that piece of information is not allowed on the article until confirmed by Jackson or someone on his behalf. If you were to reinsert it after this warning your account will be blocked. — Realist 13:40, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

OK, thanks for understanding. Have a good day. — Realist 13:41, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

Ramzi Yousef

As demonstrated by the recent reporting of Michael Jackson's alleged conversion to Islam, only untill it is confirmed by Yousef or someone on his behalf can his alleged conversion be included in the article on him.

(Taz Manchester (talk) 18:19, 25 November 2008 (UTC))

Operation Black Tornado

Hi Matt, an article about a large commando operation which involved hundreds of people and resulted in the death of a number of people is not analogous to an article about the street that the terrorists walked on. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 01:16, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

American Muslim Council reverts

Hello, Matt57 ... I am concerned about the lack of discussion between Taz Manchester (talk · contribs) and Matt57 (talk · contribs) regarding recent edits to American Muslim Council (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) ... I happen to agree with you, Matt57 ... can we please discuss this at Talk:American Muslim Council? Happy Editing! — 72.75.110.31 (talk · contribs) 19:58, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

Army correspondence course program

Hello again, Matt57 ... I could use the assistance of Some Other Editor with regards to this article:

created by:

This WP:SPA author removed the Articleissues template without comment, and they have ignored my attempts at dialog on both the article's and their own user talk pages ... I think that they need to be reminded of WP:V and WP:OWN.

Happy Editing! — 72.75.110.31 (talk · contribs) 13:43, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Army correspondence course program

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Army correspondence course program, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Article lacks sufficient Attribution for Verifiability of the Notability criteria.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Misplaced Pages is not" and Misplaced Pages's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.

If you agree with me, then perhaps you could add a {{Prod-2}} tag to indicate that you endorse the Proposed deletion? — 72.75.110.31 (talk) 18:31, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

This seconded PROD has been contested ... are you willing to post it at WP:AfD? — 72.75.110.31 (talk) 04:01, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

Muhammad and slavery

Hi Matt57 - you are welcome to do as you will with this article. I've only reverted and semi-protected it to keep the edit's of a banned user off the site. I don't have an opinion on either the subject matter or the article. Happy Editing - Peripitus (Talk) 21:07, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Giano's talkpage

Users are permitted to remove content, except sockpuppet templates, from their talkpages for whatever reason; your re-instatement is contrary to good faith editing, and I would urge you to self revert (if not too late). LessHeard vanU (talk) 15:33, 13 December 2008 (UTC)