Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Wunderland (2nd nomination): Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:44, 13 December 2008 editColonel Warden (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers31,041 edits Wunderland: keep← Previous edit Revision as of 19:51, 13 December 2008 edit undoTTN (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users58,138 edits ReplyNext edit →
Line 6: Line 6:


*'''Keep''' A drive-by, cookie-cutter nomination which does not seem to have followed the correct AFD process at ]. I had no difficulty locating several sources and have cited one. ] (]) 19:44, 13 December 2008 (UTC) *'''Keep''' A drive-by, cookie-cutter nomination which does not seem to have followed the correct AFD process at ]. I had no difficulty locating several sources and have cited one. ] (]) 19:44, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
:*You have added an article going over a book about the planet, which has nothing to do with the actual topic of the fictional planet. If you have sources pertaining the real world treatment of the actual topic, feel free to add them to the article, but do not claim that an irrelevant sources is a reason to keep it. ] (]) 19:51, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:51, 13 December 2008

Wunderland

AfDs for this article:
Wunderland (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

This fictional location does not establish notability independent of Known Space through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of original research and unnecessary plot details. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, so extended coverage is unnecessary. TTN (talk) 17:18, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

  • You have added an article going over a book about the planet, which has nothing to do with the actual topic of the fictional planet. If you have sources pertaining the real world treatment of the actual topic, feel free to add them to the article, but do not claim that an irrelevant sources is a reason to keep it. TTN (talk) 19:51, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
Categories: