| Revision as of 21:32, 22 December 2008 editNepaheshgar (talk | contribs)16,882 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:06, 22 December 2008 edit undoPolysynaptic (talk | contribs)1,817 editsm →EnglishNext edit → | ||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
| Please bring mainstream English sources for his background. If he was from Samarqand during Samanid times, it is most likely he was Soghdian/Persian. Also "Turkic" would be correct and neither an Anatolian Turkish language nor its alphabet existed 1000 years ago or was ever used in Samarkand.--] (]) 21:14, 22 December 2008 (UTC) | Please bring mainstream English sources for his background. If he was from Samarqand during Samanid times, it is most likely he was Soghdian/Persian. Also "Turkic" would be correct and neither an Anatolian Turkish language nor its alphabet existed 1000 years ago or was ever used in Samarkand.--] (]) 21:14, 22 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
| ::I did find one of your sources:, but the authors are fromt the "faculty of medicine" in a Turkish university. My source is ] who is from George Washington University and very well known in such topics as history and Islamic scholarship. Actually, without any bias, the top scholar. I think a compromise solution is simply list him as a Muslim scholar.--] (]) 21:32, 22 December 2008 (UTC) | ::I did find one of your sources:, but the authors are fromt the "faculty of medicine" in a Turkish university. My source is ] who is from George Washington University and very well known in such topics as history and Islamic scholarship. Actually, without any bias, the top scholar. I think a compromise solution is simply list him as a Muslim scholar.--] (]) 21:32, 22 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
| You Persians are determined in "infecting" anything you can touch. You are determined in destroying anything related to Turkish civilizaation. You say "Turkic". Not Turkish. So you are bergaining. not Turkish but Turkic is possible. I think after 1000 years of Turkish administration has caused mental demage on any Persian. | |||
| Maturidi is Turkish. not Persian or Turkic. Turkic is a pejorative word. It is for insulting Turks. If you were knowledgable in history at least you would know that Turkic is a pejorative world. Maturidi is no way PErsian. HE I TURKISH. Stop vandalizing Turkish related articles. | |||
| Cambridge History of Iran and Cambridge Encyclopedia are Persian nationalist crap. | |||
| --] (]) 22:03, 22 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:06, 22 December 2008
 | Biography Stub‑class  | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
{{WikiProject Islam|class=Stub|Muslim-scholars=yes|Muslim-scholars-importance=}}
No one should use the Encyclopedia for Propaganda
English
Please bring mainstream English sources for his background. If he was from Samarqand during Samanid times, it is most likely he was Soghdian/Persian. Also "Turkic" would be correct and neither an Anatolian Turkish language nor its alphabet existed 1000 years ago or was ever used in Samarkand.--Nepaheshgar (talk) 21:14, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
- I did find one of your sources:, but the authors are fromt the "faculty of medicine" in a Turkish university. My source is Seyyed Hossein Nasr who is from George Washington University and very well known in such topics as history and Islamic scholarship. Actually, without any bias, the top scholar. I think a compromise solution is simply list him as a Muslim scholar.--Nepaheshgar (talk) 21:32, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
You Persians are determined in "infecting" anything you can touch. You are determined in destroying anything related to Turkish civilizaation. You say "Turkic". Not Turkish. So you are bergaining. not Turkish but Turkic is possible. I think after 1000 years of Turkish administration has caused mental demage on any Persian.
Maturidi is Turkish. not Persian or Turkic. Turkic is a pejorative word. It is for insulting Turks. If you were knowledgable in history at least you would know that Turkic is a pejorative world. Maturidi is no way PErsian. HE I TURKISH. Stop vandalizing Turkish related articles.
Cambridge History of Iran and Cambridge Encyclopedia are Persian nationalist crap.
--Polysynaptic (talk) 22:03, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
Categories: