Misplaced Pages

:Usernames for administrator attention: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:18, 27 December 2008 editHBC AIV helperbot3 (talk | contribs)140,330 editsm 3 users left. rm Rockishell (blocked indef by Daniel_Case (ABD)).← Previous edit Revision as of 17:20, 27 December 2008 edit undoDaniel Case (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators224,468 edits User-reported: take to ANINext edit →
Line 16: Line 16:


*{{user-uaa|1=Pediapress}} Per userpage, used to promote Pediapress.com, also all edits are to userspace, strange subpage ], not sure if this needs further investigation or what. --] (]) 14:30, 27 December 2008 (UTC) *{{user-uaa|1=Pediapress}} Per userpage, used to promote Pediapress.com, also all edits are to userspace, strange subpage ], not sure if this needs further investigation or what. --] (]) 14:30, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
:{{UAA|ani}} I think this is beyond the scope of this page. We need to find out more and have more eyes look this over. ] (]) 17:20, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:20, 27 December 2008

This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators.
Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared.
UAA navigation: Main pageCategoryInstructionsPolicy
Noticeboards
Misplaced Pages's centralized discussion, request, and help venues. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the dashboard. For a related set of forums which do not function as noticeboards see formal review processes.
General
Articles and content
Page handling
User conduct
Other
Category:Misplaced Pages noticeboards
    Usernames for administrator attention Shortcut

    This page is intended for reports of usernames that are blatant and serious violations of the username policy requiring an immediate block. Reports will be assessed in accordance with the username policy, the UAA instructions, and the following bullet points. Please ensure you are familiar with the assessment criteria before making a report.

    1. Except in the instance of an egregious name violation, please do not report accounts with no edits or those who have not edited in the preceding 2 weeks.
    2. Real names are permitted, except when the editor implies they are someone other than themselves, such as impersonating a notable living person.
    3. Promotional names require evidence to be blocked. Do not report a username merely because it "appears" promotional.
    4. For libellous usernames or usernames that contain another editor's nonpublic personal information, please contact an oversighter and do not report it here.
    5. Discuss less-serious violations with the user on their talk page so that they can rename or abandon their account in good faith. Templates such as {{Uw-username}} or {{Uw-coi-username}} may be used. If, after discussion with a user, the problem still seems unresolved, a username request for comment may be in order.
    6. Do not leave a username warning on a user's talk page and also immediately report them here. Do one or the other, and not both simultaneously.
    7. Patrollers are asked to remove reports that have been declined, are bot-reported false positives or are otherwise non-blatant or stale reports.
    You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format. Note: Patrollers may wish to monitor usernames flagged by filters 54, 148 and 149; private filters 102, 354, 499, 579; and this recent changes filter tag. This page was last updated at 18:28 on 29 December 2024 (UTC). Purge the cache of this page if it is out of date.


    Bot-reported

    User-reported

    Not a blatant violation of the username policy. Consider filing a report at the conflict of interest noticeboard. This is a long-term enough thing that it should be evaluated there, not here. Daniel Case (talk) 17:16, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
    ani I think this is beyond the scope of this page. We need to find out more and have more eyes look this over. Daniel Case (talk) 17:20, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
    Category: