Revision as of 00:29, 21 October 2005 editHyacinth (talk | contribs)176,976 edits →Life... But How To Live It?: Thanks for the revert of my user page.← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:34, 21 October 2005 edit undoHall Monitor (talk | contribs)20,413 edits →RFA: Sfoskett: regarding your concernsNext edit → | ||
Line 106: | Line 106: | ||
==Vandalism== | ==Vandalism== | ||
Thanks for the revert of my user page. ] 00:29, 21 October 2005 (UTC) | Thanks for the revert of my user page. ] 00:29, 21 October 2005 (UTC) | ||
==RFA: Sfoskett== | |||
Hi Private Butcher. I read your comments and understand your concerns. Sfoskett is an understated long-time contributor who I believe would make excellent use of his administrative permissions if and when he receives them. Granted, he is not an agressive vandal fighter, but there is no disputing that he is a level-headed person who would make good use of the additional tools if they were available to him, which is why I took the initiative to nominate him in the first place. As of late, we have been granting sysop permissions to a number of vandal fighters, but I believe that anti-vandalism need not be the only focus of such a position, making Sfoskett a diverse and worthwhile editor to bring into the fold. I hope you can reconsider your change of heart, and if not, I appreciate your comments nonetheless. Best regards, ] 17:34, 21 October 2005 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:34, 21 October 2005
This Page Has Been Vandalised 2 Times
Please click here to leave me a new message.Misplaced Pages:Requests for adminship/ScottyBoy900Q
I'm not sure if you want to revisit your withdrawn vote. Since the initial nomination, a fair sized opposition has developed, not just your initial vote. Moreover, I think the discussion itself (chiefly ScottyBoy900Q's statements in response to unfavorable votes) is suggestive of temperamental qualification. Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters 21:44, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
Re:My Life
I deleted some of the more “choice” entries – the recent ones. I wasn't sure what else you wanted deleted, so that's all I did. If you go through the history, and pick out anymore, just email me and send me the links to get rid of. Hope this helps, and all is well. Regards, Bratsche 21:49, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
Re. your post on Ryan Norton's talk page
It saddens me that you think you'll never be an admin. I consider you a great and dedicated editor. Your high standards for who should be an admin should not be a reason for people to get back to you, if they mean to be serious about wanting the best for WP, for your ideas should be respected. I always admire those who have the courage to stand for their principles, and if you were to go for a RfA, I'd surely support you. I wouldn't care inthe least that you opposed mine, because I know that what you did, you did in good faith and according to your concience. All I can say to you, is, keep up the good work. You'll get there, and when you do, I'll be there to support you. My best wishes, Shauri smile! 23:26, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
Thanks for your support on my RfA!
Thanks for your support of my adminship!! I was surprised at the turnout and support I got! If you ever have any issues with any of my actions, please notify me on my talk page! Thanks again! Don't worry - you'll get your own someday, I'm sure :) - just take it easy and try to relax :). It'll come sooner then you think :). Ryan Norton 03:30, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
Hello again
Hello again, Private Butcher. I have exams next week, so I'm taking a wikibreak, even temporarily removing Misplaced Pages from the "Favorites" menu on my browser, so that I won't have too much temptation to spend time away from my books. Hope all is well with you. You're still in my prayers. God bless! Ann Heneghan 18:04, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
My dear Private Butcher
My dear Butcher, of course I am paying attention to you, and I do care a lot about your concerns. You seriously underestimate yourself and your value, both as a user and (most important) a person. You don't have to worry in the least on self nominating, because when you feel you're ready, all you have to do is ask me to do it. I hereby offer myself with pleasure, and I always honor my promises. And, hey, taking Wikibreaks is far from worrying - we all have personal lives, and every serious person should be able to observe that. You'll get there, and I bet that soone than you think. Please, do me a favor, and give me a big Smile . There. I'm sure you look much more handsome that way. Have a great day, and whenever you need me, just whistle and I'll be there. Hugs, Shauri smile! 23:45, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
My RfA
Thanks for your vote in my RfA. I'll do my best to live up to the wiki standards and be a good admin!
--Sebastian Kessel 15:24, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
My run for the mop
Thank you so much for your support of my RfA. If you need me to help you resolve a dispute, I will be available. Denelson83 21:55, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
WP:ESP
Thank you for your vote of confidence in the Esperanza elections. I look forward to helping Esperanza and Misplaced Pages progress. Flcelloguy | A note? | Desk | WS 21:59, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
More RFA thanks...
Thank you for supporting me. I'll try to only do a little bit of evil. :) Wikibofh 00:12, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
Celestianpower is an admin
Thank you very much for your support - my bid (as you probably know) went swimmingly. I couldn't have asked for a better one. Thank you very much and I just hope I don't mess up! Don't let those who say you're oppose votes on RfA are stupid disuade you from your opinions! --Celestianpower 12:46, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
orwell
What is not allowed about my artical on orwell (Unsigned comment by 84.65.210.29)
Trevor stanerson
This article is not really patent nonsense, per se, but it is without a doubt {{nn-bio}}. Ëvilphoenix 06:30, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
Deletion of Gathering Conversation
Help me understand the process. I'm a first time--Wiki
What is the criteria for deletion? What did I do wrong?
Thanks 70.35.170.125 20:40, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
My RfA
Thanks for supporting my RfA. I will use my new powers wisely! --Wikiacc (talk) 19:10, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
Thanks for the welcome.
Hi Private Butcher, thanks for the welcome. It's great being here. --AnOddName 21:22, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
User page vandalism
Thanks for the vandalism revert... seems to happen more often the more vandalism I fix. :) Thanks again, Bushytails 22:46, 18 October 2005 (UTC).
My RfA
Although you remained neutral during my RfA, I truly appreciate the time that you took to make your voice heard. It appears that I was able to gain a consensus from those who voted and I promise to do a good job using the keys to the janitor's closet. >: Roby Wayne 02:00, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
- But, I understood where you were coming from and it really made me think about of lot of things I have been doing on here since then--perception is everything. :-). Have a good one!! >: Roby Wayne 02:13, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
My RfA
Hi Private Butcher. Just wanted to thank you for supporting my RfA. I hope I will be able to live up to the confidence placed in me. Oh, and the soup was great . Thanks again, --Cyberjunkie | Talk 03:54, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
Thanks
Private - Thanks for your vote of confidence on my RfA! I hope that I can live up to everyone expectations. If you need anything, please ask. --best, kevin ···Kzollman | Talk··· 05:07, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
Thanks
Private Butcher, thanks for your support on my RFA. I very much appreciate it. If you ever need anything, don't hesitate to ask. See you around! —thames 18:24, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
Life... But How To Live It?
The information is factual and somewhat hard to come by, so I feel that it is still relevant. I have all their CD and LP covers lying here beside me and will scan and put them in the article by tomorrow. Instead of arguing about details, let's be constructive; I (and many with me) feel that this band definitely has a place in Norwegian music history, what do I have to add to the article to make it comply to Wikipedias rules?
Vandalism
Thanks for the revert of my user page. Hyacinth 00:29, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
RFA: Sfoskett
Hi Private Butcher. I read your comments and understand your concerns. Sfoskett is an understated long-time contributor who I believe would make excellent use of his administrative permissions if and when he receives them. Granted, he is not an agressive vandal fighter, but there is no disputing that he is a level-headed person who would make good use of the additional tools if they were available to him, which is why I took the initiative to nominate him in the first place. As of late, we have been granting sysop permissions to a number of vandal fighters, but I believe that anti-vandalism need not be the only focus of such a position, making Sfoskett a diverse and worthwhile editor to bring into the fold. I hope you can reconsider your change of heart, and if not, I appreciate your comments nonetheless. Best regards, Hall Monitor 17:34, 21 October 2005 (UTC)