Misplaced Pages

Eric Lerner: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 07:16, 1 January 2009 editජපස (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers60,451 edits Reverted to revision 261210150 by 72.70.21.234; restore consensus version per WP:BRD. Please form a consensus around your changes.. (TW)← Previous edit Revision as of 07:27, 1 January 2009 edit undoDicklyon (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers476,405 edits Reverted 1 edit by ScienceApologist; There is no consensus about these changes, as they haven't been discussed; let's do that on the talk page. (TW)Next edit →
Line 19: Line 19:
In the 1970s, Lerner became involved in the ], an offshoot of the Columbia University ]. Lerner left the National Caucus in 1978, and later argued in a lawsuit that he had been pressured to (but did not) illegally channel profits of an engineering firm to the ], an organization led by ].<ref name=Larouche>{{cite book |title=Lyndon LaRouche and the New American Fascism|last=King |first=Dennis |year=1989 |publisher=Doubleday|isbn=0385238800 |chapter=32|chapterurl=http://lyndonlarouchewatch.org/fascism32.htm }}</ref> In the 1970s, Lerner became involved in the ], an offshoot of the Columbia University ]. Lerner left the National Caucus in 1978, and later argued in a lawsuit that he had been pressured to (but did not) illegally channel profits of an engineering firm to the ], an organization led by ].<ref name=Larouche>{{cite book |title=Lyndon LaRouche and the New American Fascism|last=King |first=Dennis |year=1989 |publisher=Doubleday|isbn=0385238800 |chapter=32|chapterurl=http://lyndonlarouchewatch.org/fascism32.htm }}</ref>


Lerner has been involved in political activism. He has sought ] protection for immigrants as a member and spokesman for the New Jersey Civil Rights Defense Committee.<ref>Spencer S. Hsu, , ], Jan. 17, 2007; A08</ref><ref>Eman Varoqua, , The Record (Bergen County, NJ), Dec. 7, 2004</ref> According to investigative journalist ], Lerner was briefly associated with organizations controlled by ], but had a falling out due to his rejection of LaRouche's methods.<ref name=Larouche /> Lerner has been involved in political activism. He has sought ] protection for immigrants as a member and spokesman for the New Jersey Civil Rights Defense Committee.<ref>Spencer S. Hsu, , ], Jan. 17, 2007; A08</ref><ref>Eman Varoqua, , The Record (Bergen County, NJ), Dec. 7, 2004</ref>


==''The Big Bang Never Happened''== ==''The Big Bang Never Happened''==
Line 25: Line 25:
] ]


''The Big Bang Never Happened: A Startling Refutation of the Dominant Theory of the Origin of the Universe'' (1991) is Lerner's controversial book repudiating mainstream Big Bang cosmology and advancing instead a ] '']'' originally proposed by ] in the 1960s. ''The Big Bang Never Happened: A Startling Refutation of the Dominant Theory of the Origin of the Universe'' (1991) is Lerner's controversial book repudiating mainstream Big Bang cosmology and advancing instead a ] '']'' originally proposed by ], winner of the 1970 ], in the 1960s.


In this work, Lerner claims that the Big Bang theory is inconsistent with empirical data<ref>Eric Lerner, "The Big Bang Never Happened", page 12</ref><ref>Eric Lerner, "The Big Bang Never Happened", page 13</ref> and asserts that ] provides a model of the universe more consistent with observable physical laws than the ]:<blockquote>The phenomena that the Big Bang seeks to explain with a mysterious ancient catacylsm, plasma theories attribute to electrical and magnetic processes occurring in the universe today.<ref>Eric Lerner, "The Big Bang Never Happened", page 14</ref></blockquote>He proposes a model of ] which he attributes in part to the work of ] under which the universe has no definite age<ref>Eric Lerner, "The Big Bang Never Happened", footnote on page 388</ref> and continually increases in order.<ref>Eric Lerner, "The Big Bang Never Happened", pages 286-316</ref> In this work, Lerner claims that the Big Bang theory is inconsistent with empirical data<ref>Eric Lerner, "The Big Bang Never Happened", page 12</ref><ref>Eric Lerner, "The Big Bang Never Happened", page 13</ref> and asserts that ] provides a model of the universe more consistent with observable physical laws than the ]:<blockquote>The phenomena that the Big Bang seeks to explain with a mysterious ancient catacylsm, plasma theories attribute to electrical and magnetic processes occurring in the universe today.<ref>Eric Lerner, "The Big Bang Never Happened", page 14</ref></blockquote>He proposes a model of ] which he attributes in part to the work of ] under which the universe has no definite age<ref>Eric Lerner, "The Big Bang Never Happened", footnote on page 388</ref> and continually increases in order.<ref>Eric Lerner, "The Big Bang Never Happened", pages 286-316</ref>


The book received unfavorable reviews from professional cosmologists.<ref name=Wright /><ref name=Penzias /><ref name=Davies /><ref name=Stenger /> ] reviewed the book for the ] and found it to be unsatisfactory. The newspaper published a rebuttal by Lerner which was itself criticized by ], winner of the 1978 ]: The book received unfavorable reviews from professional cosmologists.<ref name=Wright /><ref name=Penzias /><ref name=Davies /><ref name=Stenger /> ], a leading proponent and popularizer of the big bang theory, reviewed the book for the ] and found it to be unsatisfactory. The newspaper published a rebuttal by Lerner, focused on Davies's misattribution of the theory to Lerner instead of to Alfvén:<ref name=Davies />

:"Mr. Davies's motive in this is clear. Like other supporters of the big bang, he wants to portray a 'scientific establishment' unified behind an unquestioned theory that is challenged only by a few individuals without real credentials. Mr. Davies finds it impossible to admit that a Nobel laureate believes that the universe had no beginning, that, in Mr. Alfven's words, 'the big bang is a myth'."

This rebuttal was itself criticized by ], winner of the 1978 ] for his codiscovery of ], generally regarded as the remnant of the Big Bang:

:"The sizes of the vast ribbons of galaxies that Eric J. Lerner refers to come straight out of the Big Bang model itself.... Contrary to Mr. Lerner's claim, therefore, the 'simple mathematics' he cites rests upon, rather than contradicts the Big Bang model."<ref name=Penzias>, New York Times, June 18, 1991</ref> :"The sizes of the vast ribbons of galaxies that Eric J. Lerner refers to come straight out of the Big Bang model itself.... Contrary to Mr. Lerner's claim, therefore, the 'simple mathematics' he cites rests upon, rather than contradicts the Big Bang model."<ref name=Penzias>, New York Times, June 18, 1991</ref>

Subsequent to this, Davies himself responded to Lerner's criticism<ref name=Davies /> of his review: Subsequent to this, Davies himself responded to Lerner's criticism of his review:

:'"It seems to me that the theory proposed by Mr. Lerner has serious problems in relation to thermodynamics. This is merely my professional opinion, for what it is worth. Others can judge for themselves.... I accept that Mr. Lerner's book reports work that is largely due to Hannes Alfven, but this does not render it immune from criticism."<ref name=Davies>, New York Times, Sep 1, 1991</ref> :'"It seems to me that the theory proposed by Mr. Lerner has serious problems in relation to thermodynamics. This is merely my professional opinion, for what it is worth. Others can judge for themselves.... I accept that Mr. Lerner's book reports work that is largely due to Hannes Alfven, but this does not render it immune from criticism."<ref name=Davies>, New York Times, Sep 1, 1991</ref>


], Professor Emeritus of Physics and Astronomy at the ], criticized Lerner's book in a 1992 edition of the popular magazine, ].<ref name=Stenger>{{cite journal | first = Victor J. | last = Stenger | title = Is the Big Bang a Bust? | url = http://www.colorado.edu/philosophy/vstenger/Cosmo/bang.txt | journal = ] | volume = 16 | issue = 412 | date = Summer 1992 }}</ref> Professor ] of ] stated that there are several errors of fact in the book;<ref name=Wright>] "''</ref> Lerner disputed this review on his website.<ref>{{cite web | url = http://bigbangneverhappened.org/p25.htm | title = The Big Bang Never Happened: Dr. Wright is Wrong | accessdate = 2008-07-13}}</ref> ] has also written a critique of Lerner's advocacy.<ref name=Carroll>] offers a direct critique of these alternatives on his blog </ref> ], Professor Emeritus of Physics and Astronomy at the ], criticized Lerner's book in a 1992 edition of the popular magazine, ].<ref name=Stenger>{{cite journal | first = Victor J. | last = Stenger | title = Is the Big Bang a Bust? | url = http://www.colorado.edu/philosophy/vstenger/Cosmo/bang.txt | journal = ] | volume = 16 | issue = 412 | date = Summer 1992 }}</ref> Professor ] of ] stated that there are several errors of fact in the book;<ref name=Wright>] "''</ref> Lerner disputed the claims of this review on his web page "Dr. Wright is Wrong."<ref>{{cite web | url = http://bigbangneverhappened.org/p25.htm | title = The Big Bang Never Happened: Dr. Wright is Wrong | accessdate = 2008-07-13}}</ref> ] has also written a critique of Lerner's advocacy.<ref name=Carroll>] offers a direct critique of these alternatives on his blog </ref>

The book also received favorable reviews from a number of reviewers who were not professional cosmologists;<ref>{{cite web | url = http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/product-description/067974049X | title = Editorial Reviews | work = Amazon.com }}</ref> for example, Gregg Sapp of ] Libraries says:


:"His contention that the Big Bang is merely a repackaged creation myth is presumptuous, but well argued. To present a current scientific controversy to a general audience risks, on one hand, misleading the public and, on the other, circumventing the peer review process. This book, however, makes valid points in a convincing manner and does neither. Recommended for general science collections."
The book also received favorable reviews from a number of reviewers who were not professional cosmologists.<ref>{{cite web | url = http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/product-description/067974049X | title = Editorial Reviews | work = Amazon.com }}</ref>


==References== ==References==

Revision as of 07:27, 1 January 2009

File:Lerner at google.jpg
Lerner at a Google TechTalks presentation in 2007

Eric J. Lerner is an American popular science writer, independent plasma researcher, and serves as the executive director of the Focus Fusion Society and president of Lawrenceville Plasma Physics, Inc. He is an advocate of plasma cosmology, a nonstandard cosmology, and authored the 1991 book The Big Bang Never Happened, which advocates Hannes Alfvén's alternative to the dominant Big Bang theory.

Professional work

Lerner was born in 1947 in Brookline, Massachusetts, and received a BA in physics from Columbia University. He did graduate work in physics at the University of Maryland, College Park, and then pursued a career in popular science writing.

In 1984, he began studying plasma phenomena and laboratory fusion devices, performing experimental work on the dense plasma focus. Lerner received funding from NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in 1994 and 2001 to explore whether the dense plasma focus could be an effective ion thruster to propel spacecraft. He believes that it can also be used to produce useful aneutronic fusion energy.

Lerner is a critic of the Big Bang model and advocates an infinitely old Universe. In 2006 he accepted an invitation to be a Visiting Scientist at the European Southern Observatory in Chile, offered at the initiative of fellow Big Bang critic and MOND enthusiast Riccardo Scarpa.

Lerner is also an active general science writer, estimating that he has had about 600 articles published. He has received journalism awards between 1984 and 1993 from the Aviation Space Writers Association.

Activism

While at Columbia, Lerner participated in the 1965 Selma March and helped organize the 1968 Columbia Student Strike.

In the 1970s, Lerner became involved in the National Caucus of Labor Committees, an offshoot of the Columbia University Students for a Democratic Society. Lerner left the National Caucus in 1978, and later argued in a lawsuit that he had been pressured to (but did not) illegally channel profits of an engineering firm to the US Labor Party, an organization led by Lyndon LaRouche.

Lerner has been involved in political activism. He has sought civil rights protection for immigrants as a member and spokesman for the New Jersey Civil Rights Defense Committee.

The Big Bang Never Happened

File:Big-bang-never-happened.jpg
Lerner's 1991 book, The Big Bang Never Happened

The Big Bang Never Happened: A Startling Refutation of the Dominant Theory of the Origin of the Universe (1991) is Lerner's controversial book repudiating mainstream Big Bang cosmology and advancing instead a non-standard plasma cosmology originally proposed by Hannes Alfvén, winner of the 1970 Nobel Prize for Physics, in the 1960s.

In this work, Lerner claims that the Big Bang theory is inconsistent with empirical data and asserts that plasma cosmology provides a model of the universe more consistent with observable physical laws than the big bang:

The phenomena that the Big Bang seeks to explain with a mysterious ancient catacylsm, plasma theories attribute to electrical and magnetic processes occurring in the universe today.

He proposes a model of thermodynamics which he attributes in part to the work of Ilya Prigogine under which the universe has no definite age and continually increases in order.

The book received unfavorable reviews from professional cosmologists. Paul Davies, a leading proponent and popularizer of the big bang theory, reviewed the book for the New York Times and found it to be unsatisfactory. The newspaper published a rebuttal by Lerner, focused on Davies's misattribution of the theory to Lerner instead of to Alfvén:

"Mr. Davies's motive in this is clear. Like other supporters of the big bang, he wants to portray a 'scientific establishment' unified behind an unquestioned theory that is challenged only by a few individuals without real credentials. Mr. Davies finds it impossible to admit that a Nobel laureate believes that the universe had no beginning, that, in Mr. Alfven's words, 'the big bang is a myth'."

This rebuttal was itself criticized by Arno A. Penzias, winner of the 1978 Nobel Prize for Physics for his codiscovery of cosmic microwave background radiation, generally regarded as the remnant of the Big Bang:

"The sizes of the vast ribbons of galaxies that Eric J. Lerner refers to come straight out of the Big Bang model itself.... Contrary to Mr. Lerner's claim, therefore, the 'simple mathematics' he cites rests upon, rather than contradicts the Big Bang model."

Subsequent to this, Davies himself responded to Lerner's criticism of his review:

'"It seems to me that the theory proposed by Mr. Lerner has serious problems in relation to thermodynamics. This is merely my professional opinion, for what it is worth. Others can judge for themselves.... I accept that Mr. Lerner's book reports work that is largely due to Hannes Alfven, but this does not render it immune from criticism."

Victor J. Stenger, Professor Emeritus of Physics and Astronomy at the University of Hawaii, criticized Lerner's book in a 1992 edition of the popular magazine, Skeptical Inquirer. Professor Edward L. Wright of UCLA stated that there are several errors of fact in the book; Lerner disputed the claims of this review on his web page "Dr. Wright is Wrong." Sean M. Carroll has also written a critique of Lerner's advocacy.

The book also received favorable reviews from a number of reviewers who were not professional cosmologists; for example, Gregg Sapp of Montana State University Libraries says:

"His contention that the Big Bang is merely a repackaged creation myth is presumptuous, but well argued. To present a current scientific controversy to a general audience risks, on one hand, misleading the public and, on the other, circumventing the peer review process. This book, however, makes valid points in a convincing manner and does neither. Recommended for general science collections."

References

  1. John Wilford, "Novel Theory Challenges The Big Bang", New York Times, February 28, 1989
  2. See Personnel listed on the Web site for Lawrenceville Plasma Physics, Inc.
  3. H. Ratcliffe, "The First Crisis in Cosmology Conference" (PDF), Progress in Physics (Oct 2005)
  4. Columbia Alumni Directory, 1988 edition, p.211
  5. Biography at the Space Show, 2006
  6. Kenneth Chang, "Practical Fusion, or Just a Bubble?", New York Times, Feb. 27, 2007
  7. JPL Contract 959962, pg 8, and JPL Contract 960283
  8. Patrick Huyghe, "3 Ideas That Are Pushing the Edge of Science", Discover Magazine, June 2008
  9. Marcus Chown, "Did the Big Bang Really Happen?", New Scientist, 2 July 2005
  10. ESO Senior Visits in 2006, activities, and ESO Santiago Science Colloquia and Seminars 2006
  11. Lerner estimates he has had about 600 articles published, in article such as Discover, and Industrial Physicist.
  12. Kasra Manoocheri, "Selma Interview: Eric Lerner", Veterans of the Civil Rights Movement web site, Feb. 2007
  13. "A Memorandum from the Strike Education Committee", Columbia University archives, May 4, 1968. Lists Eric Lerner as one of the committee members.
  14. King, Dennis (1989). "32". Lyndon LaRouche and the New American Fascism. Doubleday. ISBN 0385238800. {{cite book}}: External link in |chapterurl= (help); Unknown parameter |chapterurl= ignored (|chapter-url= suggested) (help)
  15. Spencer S. Hsu, "Immigrants Mistreated, Report Says", Washington Post, Jan. 17, 2007; A08
  16. Eman Varoqua, "Not Everyone Is A Terrorist", The Record (Bergen County, NJ), Dec. 7, 2004
  17. Eric Lerner, "The Big Bang Never Happened", page 12
  18. Eric Lerner, "The Big Bang Never Happened", page 13
  19. Eric Lerner, "The Big Bang Never Happened", page 14
  20. Eric Lerner, "The Big Bang Never Happened", footnote on page 388
  21. Eric Lerner, "The Big Bang Never Happened", pages 286-316
  22. ^ Wright, Edward L. "Errors in "The Big Bang Never Happened"
  23. ^ "Big Bang Theory Makes Sense of Cosmic Facts; No Contradiction", New York Times, June 18, 1991
  24. ^ "Did the Big Bang Happen?", New York Times, Sep 1, 1991
  25. ^ Stenger, Victor J. (Summer 1992). "Is the Big Bang a Bust?". Skeptical Inquirer. 16 (412).
  26. "The Big Bang Never Happened: Dr. Wright is Wrong". Retrieved 2008-07-13.
  27. Sean Carroll offers a direct critique of these alternatives on his blog Preposterous Universe
  28. "Editorial Reviews". Amazon.com.

External links and references

Categories: