Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 21:00, 21 October 2005

1. User talk:Rex071404/archive1
2. User talk:Rex071404/archive2
3. User talk:Rex071404/archive3
4. User talk:Rex071404/archive4
5. User talk:Rex071404/archive5

Last update: 10.21.05

reply to your query

I have responded on User talk:Fred Bauder. -- Viajero 10:59, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)

I too, have responded on User talk:Fred Bauder. Rex071404 13:17, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Was it really necessary to copy all that stuff to the talk page of Ward Churchill? I would have thought that the discussion belonged on Fred's talk page. -- Viajero 13:54, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Yes, it was necesary. I want to make sure readers at Talk:Ward_Churchill are fully apprised. Rex071404 13:58, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)

My comment on Ward Churchill's appearance was based on his resemblance to some of my close relatives (my mother and grandmother) whom I know to be partly Native American. Fred Bauder 15:37, Apr 14, 2005 (UTC)

It would have been less prone to misinterpretation, had you said that to begin with. Still, you would never say that someone "has a big nose" or "thick lips" and then suggest that they are this or that, would you? Why then try to divine Churchill's geneology from his appearance? And by doing that, aren't you weighing your edits with your personal opinion? And if so, that's truly POV. The public facts do not reasonably support any assertions or suppositions about Churchill actually being a Native American (not in any true sense). That being the case, I frankly am unmoved that you "feel we should take his word for it" based on your personal opinion of his appearance. I think Fred, as an attorney, you ought to be able to see the error of your logic here. Your personal feelings are not one of the public facts which we can rest our editorial standards on. Indeed, we've already established that such methods are not the rule here - as evidenced by the fierce way my personal feelings are scrubbed by others from articles such as John Kerry. Also, as evidenced by the blocking of my edits to Dedham, Massachusetts, it's not enough that an individual editor personally "know" or "feel" something to be true. Rather, it must be backed up by public fact sources that other editors will accept. I have two problems with using your "feelings" as a source: a) feelings are subject to change and therefore are not reliable as an ongoing fact referrence and b) I am repulsed by the notion we ought to judge people by appearance. That said, thanks for answering about Ward Churchill. But, I am still curious, why did you not answer my email? And why do you stand mute on that topic in this reply to me? Rex071404 15:58, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)

(copied from Talk:Ward_Churchill):

I did say that to begin with and only on the talk page. As to your mail, I do not recall a particular message to me. Fred Bauder 16:09, Apr 14, 2005 (UTC)

Did say what? Rex071404 16:20, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)

(all comments after this have been added to my archive #5)

Spamming admins...

...will not be of help to you. I suggest going to the the Requests for Comment page.

Thanks, BCorr|Брайен 02:27, 21 October 2005 (UTC)

Well

You might not be BigDaddy, but so far (and looking at the arbcom decision), you have alot of his tendancies. Hopefully in the last 6 months, you've learned to be more civil. I hope so. My only piece of advice is that I'm not sure it's a good idea to have a "Liberal Editors Cabal". The problem is that you are then earmarking yourself as having an agenda and that doesn't always help you here. --Woohookitty 04:11, 21 October 2005 (UTC)

I have already copied those details to a less offensively titled scratch page and am working from my new page since yesterday. Frankly, if user Kizzle and user Accountable 1135 weren't snooping on me, the "cabal" named page would not have popped up. The purpose of that list of edits is to refract it over time - as a edits tracking device - should I have to refer to it to discern a pattern which can be pointed to during any official procedings. As it stands now, I feel that Accountable 1135 has pushed too far against me and ought to be sanctioned by Arbcomm. Suffice it to say, I feel that over time, the depth of the pro-liberal bias on various political pages will be clear. Please see my full details on the talk page of John Kerry. I think the facts support my position that critiques (even factual, tactfully written ones) are more tightly screened from entering biographic pages about Liberals, than they are with Conservatives. Look at the page for George W. Bush and see how critical/harsh it is. Then read Kerry's page and see that it's a virtual hagiography. Perhaps I am mistaken, but that's how I see it. Yet, certain others at Kerry's page gang up to block any edits at all from me there. As for the "cabal" page, I am only opposing its deletion so as not to set a precedent which prevents me from keeping an edits log. In no way is my log a "hit list" (as it's been called - whatever that means). Nor are there any personal attacks, bad words or imprecations on it. Because of that, if I assent to it's deletion, I am allowing an editor (who's edit history is suspicious to me) - that being Accountable 1135 - to boss me right off the wiki.Rex071404 04:39, 21 October 2005 (UTC)

Oh yes...Rex = Big Daddy. Definitely. No question. Great detective work again by that big, strong, intelligent man - WooHooKitty. (What kind of name is 'WooHooKitty' for a grown male anyway? LOL!

Ps Rex, good luck dealing with these douchebags....err...I mean cellular nanotechnologists. I punk'd them out so hard, they had to ban me. (For a few yuks, check out - http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/BigDaddy777/Evidence.) I guess they tried the same tack on you a while ago too.

I'm sure it's merely a coincidence that we're both conservatives, huh?

Pss Rex, be sure to DOCUMENT all the things you've discovered on the John Kerry page etc.

It's awesome that you and I INDEPENDENTLY observed (and can corrorborate) virtually the exact same pattern by which these liberals produce Misplaced Pages articles - Demonize conservatives; lionize liberals. It's repeated ad infinitum, ad nauseum.

I've already talked to people and these headcases have a HUGE PR problem on their hands. The more proof we have, the easier it will be to persuade all but their fellow Chomsky-worshipping, Jew-baiting, anal-retentive, truth-haters not to give one more red cent to Misplaced Pages. And, until WHOLESALE changes are made from the top down, that's precisely what I've decided needs to happen. Their actions are so bizarre. It's almost like distorting reality to comport to left-wing templates is the foundational tenet of their religion. Too bad they're gonna have to find a church other than Misplaced Pages to congregate, huh?

And don't think they're not already freaking out. Rumor has it my actions are already sending users Hippocrite, Fred Bauder, WoohooKitty, JamesMLane, Kizzle, FVW, Derex and especially the pimply faced 15 year old RedWolf to become so verklempt they don't know whether to schedule an appointement with their psychiatrist...or their gynecologist.

Big Daddy- PHASE II -Dry up the funding (on the road)

To the person or person(s) making the above remarks (those attributed to "Big Daddy")

I would prefer that you not leave harsh commentary, invective, imprecations or threatening statements about others or about this wiki on my page (here) and I am specfically requesting that you cease and desist, immediately.

I do not subscribe to the view that others or this wiki ought to be viewed or talked about derisively. My usage of the term "bias" is in the literal, not pejorative sense. I think that any fair reading of my talk page comments over the last few days, makes that clear.

I have enough problems watching my own p's & q's to expend any effort staving off issues that you may initiate by posting hostile commentary here.

I've made no assesment about whether "Big Daddy" is guilty of this or that or what-have-you, but I do know that others have reasonably concluded that he is a menace and for that reason, I explicitly condemn his agressive actions (if any).

I am not a party to the "Big Daddy" conflict,. I do not want to be a party to it and I will delete any further references made to it or by (purportedly or genuinely, whichever) him on this page.

Rex071404 21:00, 21 October 2005 (UTC)