User talk:Richardlord50: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 11:21, 2 January 2009 editJaakobou (talk \| contribs)15,880 edits →Geosurveillance: +re← Previous edit		Revision as of 11:23, 2 January 2009 edit undoRichardlord50 (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users5,402 edits →Geosurveillance Next edit →
Line 88:		Line 88:
	:Every wiki editor has a personal ] and a talk page as well. You can leave them a note on their talk page to talk with them.		:Every wiki editor has a personal ] and a talk page as well. You can leave them a note on their talk page to talk with them.
	:Cheers, <b><font face="Arial" color="teal">]</font><font color="1F860E"><sup>'']''</sup></font></b> 11:21, 2 January 2009 (UTC)		:Cheers, <b><font face="Arial" color="teal">]</font><font color="1F860E"><sup>'']''</sup></font></b> 11:21, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

			{{help}}

			Many thanks most helpful

Revision as of 11:23, 2 January 2009

Can you please discuss on the talk page if you think you are correct in adding that stuff to the Foucault page? I have said twice now that it is an original essay, which is not what Misplaced Pages is supposed to be about. Such material should be deleted according to Misplaced Pages guidelines. If you do not feel it is original research, please explain on the talk page? csloat (talk) 23:39, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

Hi -- please read WP:NOR and WP:V; it is not enough to say "I can give you cites if you like." Citations must be in the material added to the encyclopedia entry, not offered privately as an aside. What you are adding looks like an original essay, full of opinions that aren't attributed to anyone specific. Please use the article's talk page to discuss this further. csloat (talk) 23:57, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

I did not accuse you of "copying" the essay -- the problem is that it is an original essay, not necessarily that it is copied from somewhere. Please click the above links on No Original Research and Verifiability for further details, and use the talk page of the article if you feel this essay is exempt from these rules. csloat (talk) 00:17, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

3RR

Warning

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you.

(note you have already made four edits here in less than 24 hours -- less than 3 hours actually, so you are already in violation of this rule. Please stop.) csloat (talk) 00:21, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

{{Helpme}} I have made 4 edits because someone (who incidently hasn't got back to me) keeps deleleting them but dosn't get back to me with any answer as to why.Richardlord50 (talk) 01:17, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

Also you still not furnished any proof that the essay is original.And also Do you have real name and when do you think I can have my edit back and you will not stop me from thinking.Richardlord50 (talk) 01:17, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

Original Research

Hi - you seem to misunderstand Misplaced Pages policies. In this edit on my talk page you acknowledge that the material you are adding is "your own research." That is expressly forbidden by Misplaced Pages policy, which is explained here. Please read that link before you continue to edit. Thanks. csloat (talk) 00:33, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

Godwin already? There's no need to call me a Nazi. If you don't agree with Misplaced Pages rules, go to the relevant talk pages and advocate getting them changed. Nobody is asking you not to think. We're just asking you not to use an encyclopedia as an outlet for your original scholarship. csloat (talk) 01:42, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

August 2008

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Michel Foucault. Doing so violates Misplaced Pages's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, your edits will be considered vandalism and you will be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. Although you provide two references, the bulk of what you have written falls under original research and must be properly sourced to be included. freshacconcispeaktome 12:21, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

It is original content and it is sourced.Under sources you will see that it is my source I wrote the word sources.By original do you mean copy can you PROVE categorically that it is original?It is 3 references not 2 and it is properly sourced. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Richardlord50 (talk • contribs)

No, by original I mean original as in original research. In other words, your ideas. I have no idea where you get the idea of a "copy" from. Please read the link above on original research and why it's an important policy. And the onus is on you to provide proof of it not being original research. That would mean more than the 3 references you provide. Whenever an idea is presented that goes beyond the everyday, it must be sourced. So, indicating that Foucault is French is everyday knowledge and would rarely require a citation, unless it's controversial (see Jean-Luc Godard on when that sort of thing happens). But bringing in an interpretation on Foucault's ideas requires a verifiable source. See WP:V for information on what this means. You acknowledge that what you are attempting to include are your original ideas. That by very definition is original research. Even if you have your own published material (i.e. written by you and not self-published), this would become an issue of conflict of interest, which would need to be addresses. I will include some information below on how to edit Misplaced Pages, including using verifiable sources. Please read this careful so you can avoid being blocked for edit disruptions. As a courtesy to other editors (remember, Misplaced Pages is collaborative), you should discuss major changes on the talk pages of articles, especially if it proves to be controversial. Thanks. freshacconcispeaktome 16:43, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

Welcome

Hello, Richardlord50, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Misplaced Pages articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Misplaced Pages also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

There is a page about the verifiability policy that explains the policy in greater detail, and another that offers tips on the proper ways of citing sources. If you are stuck and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Misplaced Pages:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! freshacconcispeaktome 16:44, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

I have already said that I can give you verifiable sources it is not made up out of own head READ THE SOURCE THAT I PROVIVDED i.e. The Biopolitical Justification For Geosurevillance:Geographical Review July 2007 Vol97(3) pp.389-403 READ THE ARTICLE then discuss.Also I am a PHD NOT A STUDENT THEY ARE NOT INTEREPRETATION OF FOUCAULT'S IDEAS

Image copyright problem with Image:Geosurveillance.pdf

Thanks for uploading Image:Geosurveillance.pdf. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Misplaced Pages's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Misplaced Pages:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 15:05, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Geosurveillance Through The Mapping Of Test Results.pdf

Thanks for uploading Image:Geosurveillance Through The Mapping Of Test Results.pdf. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Misplaced Pages's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

I have been here since 12:00 today trying to down load a file at least 5 hours has been wasted trying to download 1 file it still hasn't been done yet.HOW DO I GO ABOUT DOWNLOADING THIS FILE?

No content in Category:Incarceration In America Prisons

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:Incarceration In America Prisons, by another Misplaced Pages user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:Incarceration In America Prisons has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (CSD C1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:Incarceration In America Prisons, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 02:19, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Social and Behavioural Sciences

Category:Social and Behavioural Sciences, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Cgingold (talk) 10:46, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

Geosurveillance

Please can you help me please my article Geosurveillance is being considered for deletion I need time to complete my final edits.Which won't be completed until at least the end of January.Richardlord50 (talk) 10:13, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Hi Richardlord50,

I would suggest copying your text to a personal area (on your computer or a Misplaced Pages:User page area, on a user subpage) and finishing it up there if you think the article is at a state where it is going to be deleted.

Hope this helps, Jaakobou 11:08, 2 January 2009 (UTC) clarify 11:08, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

No this does'nt help at all especially when the editor WP:SYTHN has not ready any of the references.How do I contact him.

Heyo,

Every wiki editor has a personal user page and a talk page as well. You can leave them a note on their talk page to talk with them.

Cheers, Jaakobou 11:21, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

For help with this template, please post a comment on the template talk page with a {{reply to}} one or more of the previous editors.

Many thanks most helpful