Revision as of 19:57, 22 October 2005 editとある白い猫 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers55,796 edits →CVU removal← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:09, 22 October 2005 edit undoAngela (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users45,368 edits LogosNext edit → | ||
Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
I see that you removed yourself from ]. Is there a problem? Or is this a temporary edit? --] 19:50, 22 October 2005 (UTC) | I see that you removed yourself from ]. Is there a problem? Or is this a temporary edit? --] 19:50, 22 October 2005 (UTC) | ||
:Obviously some people think they can just overload me with more and more stress and expect me to stay calm. I am tried of putting up with constant threats of "oh you just lost your chance of being admin" and other nonsense. Then you have the people trolling/staliking and in addition an arbcom that can barely ask stalkers nicely to leave me alone. It all adds up to this. --] ] 19:57, 22 October 2005 (UTC) | :Obviously some people think they can just overload me with more and more stress and expect me to stay calm. I am tried of putting up with constant threats of "oh you just lost your chance of being admin" and other nonsense. Then you have the people trolling/staliking and in addition an arbcom that can barely ask stalkers nicely to leave me alone. It all adds up to this. --] ] 19:57, 22 October 2005 (UTC) | ||
== Logos == | |||
The Board has no policy on this yet, though it is under discussion right now. My latest email on this topic mentioned the logos you'd made (along with many other examples), noting that the CVU logo is now widely in use, with no conclusion from the Board, and that I didn't think it was an issue based on past precedents. No comments were made in response to this to suggest these logos were not ok. I can't give you "Board approval" since the Board has no official logo use policy yet, but I can say no one on the Board has objected to ]. This shouldn't be taken to mean we don't have objections to other modified versions of the logo, especially ones which might suggest an ]. ]] 20:09, 22 October 2005 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:09, 22 October 2005
User:Cool Cat/topbar User:Cool Cat/Wikistress2 User:Cool Cat/Talk Template Archive: 2005, 2006, 2007 Mediation History: 2005 Bad Wolf User:Cool Cat/Contacts Awards:
On an extended wikileave/I am UNHERE. I do not know when I will be back do not email me anything as I am unlikely to check it. Just post anything below if you have to. I am quite pissed off. --Cool Cat 19:37, 22 October 2005 (UTC) User posts: Template:FulldatetimeWiki-DefCon adjustmentI think the bot adjusts need to be a little less sensitive, to avoid sudden jumps over multiple levels; just now, it went to WD-1 directly from WD-3 ;-) Kirill Lokshin 19:27, 22 October 2005 (UTC) What algorithm does the bot use? ~~ N (t/c) 19:34, 22 October 2005 (UTC) CVU removalI see that you removed yourself from CVU. Is there a problem? Or is this a temporary edit? --Nlu 19:50, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
LogosThe Board has no policy on this yet, though it is under discussion right now. My latest email on this topic mentioned the logos you'd made (along with many other examples), noting that the CVU logo is now widely in use, with no conclusion from the Board, and that I didn't think it was an issue based on past precedents. No comments were made in response to this to suggest these logos were not ok. I can't give you "Board approval" since the Board has no official logo use policy yet, but I can say no one on the Board has objected to Image:CVU2.PNG. This shouldn't be taken to mean we don't have objections to other modified versions of the logo, especially ones which might suggest an inappropriate relationship with Wikimedia. Angela. 20:09, 22 October 2005 (UTC) |