| Revision as of 05:05, 11 January 2009 edit66.159.149.39 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:50, 11 January 2009 edit undoSennen goroshi (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers5,008 edits →edit wars - blocking without violating 3rr etc: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
| please restore the page | please restore the page | ||
| == edit wars - blocking without violating 3rr etc == | |||
| Hi, I am back from my one week block and very happy to be back. | |||
| Following the message you gave me regarding my block, I am starting to understand that the biggest issue is not 3RR, but edit warring.. | |||
| I would like to draw your attention to the recent edits of Caspian Blue, http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Joseon_Dynasty&action=history | |||
| in which he does not violate 3RR, but he makes 3 reverts (due to content dispute, not as he claims in the majority of his revert edit summaries reverting vandalism) in the space of less than one hour - and then stops, to me this is gaming and edit warring. I am sure he thought his edits were right, you may or may not agree with his opinion, but thinking you are right is no excuse for this - I thought I was right with my edits but I was shown the error of my ways. | |||
| Considering that he was lucky not to get blocked at the same time as I did, should have shown him that this style of editing is not acceptable - however this does not seem to be the case, and as he has a similar block history to myself I think these actions deserve a block of a similar period to mine. | |||
| The reason I am telling you and not just making a report is that you are familiar with the editor in question and perhaps more qualified to take action than an editor who has no knowledge of the above editor. | |||
| thanks | |||
| ] (]) 05:50, 11 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 05:50, 11 January 2009
User talk:Aitias/archive 3/tph
Message from User:Omegamormegil
Please restore the article Vino (Software).Omegamormegil (talk) 02:22, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
- Sorry, that article has never existed. Thus, I can not restore it. — Aitias // discussion 03:13, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
request for restoration of article
I would like the following article restored
http://en.wikipedia.org/The_Inheritors_(1980_film)
Respectfully (Jeremy Brosnahan 03:24, 11 January 2009 (UTC))
- The article was taken to AfD and other users voted it to be deleted. Versus22 talk 04:22, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
please restore the page
edit wars - blocking without violating 3rr etc
Hi, I am back from my one week block and very happy to be back.
Following the message you gave me regarding my block, I am starting to understand that the biggest issue is not 3RR, but edit warring..
I would like to draw your attention to the recent edits of Caspian Blue, http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Joseon_Dynasty&action=history
in which he does not violate 3RR, but he makes 3 reverts (due to content dispute, not as he claims in the majority of his revert edit summaries reverting vandalism) in the space of less than one hour - and then stops, to me this is gaming and edit warring. I am sure he thought his edits were right, you may or may not agree with his opinion, but thinking you are right is no excuse for this - I thought I was right with my edits but I was shown the error of my ways.
Considering that he was lucky not to get blocked at the same time as I did, should have shown him that this style of editing is not acceptable - however this does not seem to be the case, and as he has a similar block history to myself I think these actions deserve a block of a similar period to mine.
The reason I am telling you and not just making a report is that you are familiar with the editor in question and perhaps more qualified to take action than an editor who has no knowledge of the above editor.
thanks