| Revision as of 09:09, 18 September 2008 view sourceVanished user 05 (talk | contribs)6,607 edits archived← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:00, 12 January 2009 view source Russavia (talk | contribs)78,741 edits →Web brigades....again: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| Other pages: ], ] | Other pages: ], ] | ||
| == Web brigades....again == | |||
| I think you may want to look at ]. The ] has again reinserted all that information which is not relevant to this Russian conspiracy theory, and now ] is ] by claiming consensus and reinserting said info again. What do you think? Is it about time this piece of rubbish article is taken to AfD, and have this thrashed out for once and for all, because the entire thing is based upon the views of a single nutcase reporter. Anyway, your views on this are welcome on the article talk page, as it seems this is going to happen every other month when the owner of the article decides to re-include everything again. --] <sup>]</sup> 01:00, 12 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 01:00, 12 January 2009
See old threads: Archive.
Other pages: /List of articles in Western press about Russia, User_Talk:Ellol/List
Web brigades....again
I think you may want to look at web brigades. The article owner has again reinserted all that information which is not relevant to this Russian conspiracy theory, and now User:Martintg is playing the team game by claiming consensus and reinserting said info again. What do you think? Is it about time this piece of rubbish article is taken to AfD, and have this thrashed out for once and for all, because the entire thing is based upon the views of a single nutcase reporter. Anyway, your views on this are welcome on the article talk page, as it seems this is going to happen every other month when the owner of the article decides to re-include everything again. --Russavia 01:00, 12 January 2009 (UTC)