| Revision as of 14:21, 12 January 2009 editMiszaBot III (talk | contribs)597,462 editsm Archiving 2 thread(s) (older than 2d) to User talk:JzG/Archives/January 2009.← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:26, 12 January 2009 edit undoAbd (talk | contribs)14,259 edits →lenr-canr.org: briefly, was your addition to the blacklist a legitimate use of your admin tools?Next edit → | ||
| Line 106: | Line 106: | ||
| ::: Process is pretty straightforward: the link is listed at the requests page, people review the site, the links, the user behaviour and the cost/benefit of blacklisting. Meta admins are just folks, like anyone else. You might recognise some names like Mike.lifeguard, Herbythyme, Beetstra and so on. <b>]</b> <small>(])</small> 19:16, 11 January 2009 (UTC) | ::: Process is pretty straightforward: the link is listed at the requests page, people review the site, the links, the user behaviour and the cost/benefit of blacklisting. Meta admins are just folks, like anyone else. You might recognise some names like Mike.lifeguard, Herbythyme, Beetstra and so on. <b>]</b> <small>(])</small> 19:16, 11 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
| ::::Sure, and Mike.lifeguard is now asking the questions which might have been properly asked in the first place, if people didn't recognize your name and assume that if you said it, it must be true. For others who look here, there is also a listing for newenergytimes.com, added to the blacklist by JzG shortly after he added lenr-canr.org. I assume that you'll notice the continued discussion at the local blacklist talk page, most recently on newenergytimes.com -- not raised by me, I hadn't noticed it! -- and, as well, on meta for both lenr-canr.org and newenergytimes.com. | |||
| ::::There is one way in which you might remain a relevant party. You, I've asserted, improperly used your admin tools to support your content position, making your edits unrevertible by adding links, arguably legitimate -- *and still in the article*, just without the publicly readable copy URL --, and without discussion. I'd say that you should acknowledge that this was improper, or else we might fear you'd do it again. What do you say? --] (]) 19:26, 12 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Exopolitics (Institute) == | == Exopolitics (Institute) == | ||
Revision as of 19:26, 12 January 2009
|
This user is a member of the Misplaced Pages Ultra Secret Inner Inner Cabal, a cabal so secret that not only am I not allowed to know who the other members are, I am not even allowed to know if there are any other members, and if I ever did find out that anyone else was a member I would have to kill them immediately.
You can contact WUSIIC on #wikipedia-ultra-secret-inner-inner-cabal on Freenode. As a courtesy you are requested to kill yourself afterwards. |
If you are going to be a dick, please be a giant dick, so we can ban you quickly and save time. Thank you so much.
|
I check in most evenings, and occasionally some days during the day. I am on UK time (I can see Greenwich Royal Observatory from my office). If you post a reply at 8pm EST and get no reply by 10pm, it's likely because I'm asleep. My wiki interests at the moment are limited. I still handle some OTRS tickets. You can find me on facebook: my profile. Please include your WP username if sending a friend request.
Dispute resolution, Bible style - and actually an excellent model on Misplaced Pages as well.
If your brother sins against you, go and show him his fault, just between the two of you. If he listens to you, you have won your brother over.
But if he will not listen, take one or two others along, so that 'every matter may be established by the testimony of two or three witnesses.'
If he refuses to listen to them, tell it to the church; and if he refuses to listen even to the church, treat him as you would a pagan or a tax collector.
— Matthew 18:15
Please do not try to provoke me to anger, it's not difficult to do, so it's not in the least bit clever, and experience indicates that some at least who deliberately make my life more miserable than it needs to be, have been banned and stayed that way. Make an effort to assume good faith and let's see if we can't get along. Guy (Help!) 22:16, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
- Please see User:JzG/Harassment links.
the internets is populated by eggshells armed with hammers
- Bored? Looking for something to do? Try User:Eagle 101/problem BLPs.
- Really bored? Visit my website: http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk
- User talk:Raul654/Civil POV pushing - extremely interesting debate on what I feel is one of the worst problems on Misplaced Pages right now.
Note to self
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Istria&diff=192329190&oldid=189359747
<3
Celarnor has given you a kitten! Kittens promote Wikilove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Share the WikiLove and civility with everyone and keep up the excellent editing! Send kittens to others by adding {{subst:Joy message}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Cycling events
Argh - just realised you are a cycling fan anyway so removed this mini-rant ;-)
WP:ANI
Following your note her, can you remind him to stop things such as . -- User:Docu
Wikibreak
I'm taking a few days off, I have some things that a re filling my time and Misplaced Pages is (as always) an irresistable distraction. Guy
lenr-canr.org
This site has now been blacklisted on meta after a review by completely uninvolved and independent meta admins, who have absolutely no dog in the fight over pseudoscience, fringe science, cold fusion or anything else. Since the major plank of Abd's complaint was that I was an involved party and thus should not have been the one to blacklist, and the blacklist entry I added to the enWP blacklist is now redundant and removed, I hope that is an end of it. I recommend tot he parties concerned that they use the most excellent Digital object identifier system, which delivers the reader to an authoritative source for the abstract and/or full text of any reputable academic paper. There is, I am told, a magic link that works like the ISBN magic link. That seems to em to be the best and most obvious way to cite any scientific paper without risk of misrepresentation, selective quoting, copyright problems or whatever. Guy (Help!) 20:59, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
- he he no need to thank, it's a pleasure to lend a hand to a foreign wikifriend. Sergio † BC™ (Write me!) 23:47, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, this may possibly remove you as a relevant party, though I haven't looked at the process on the metalist. Thanks. --Abd (talk) 17:44, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
- Process is pretty straightforward: the link is listed at the requests page, people review the site, the links, the user behaviour and the cost/benefit of blacklisting. Meta admins are just folks, like anyone else. You might recognise some names like Mike.lifeguard, Herbythyme, Beetstra and so on. Guy (Help!) 19:16, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
- Sure, and Mike.lifeguard is now asking the questions which might have been properly asked in the first place, if people didn't recognize your name and assume that if you said it, it must be true. For others who look here, there is also a listing for newenergytimes.com, added to the blacklist by JzG shortly after he added lenr-canr.org. I assume that you'll notice the continued discussion at the local blacklist talk page, most recently on newenergytimes.com -- not raised by me, I hadn't noticed it! -- and, as well, on meta for both lenr-canr.org and newenergytimes.com.
- There is one way in which you might remain a relevant party. You, I've asserted, improperly used your admin tools to support your content position, making your edits unrevertible by adding links, arguably legitimate -- *and still in the article*, just without the publicly readable copy URL --, and without discussion. I'd say that you should acknowledge that this was improper, or else we might fear you'd do it again. What do you say? --Abd (talk) 19:26, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
Exopolitics (Institute)
Hi. As you commented on the AFD for the page Exopolitics Institute, you may want to comment on the AFD of the successor article, Exopolitics (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Thanks, Sceptre 17:22, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
Categories: