| Revision as of 05:39, 24 January 2009 editTermer (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers10,543 edits →NPOV: RE← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:47, 24 January 2009 edit undoRussavia (talk | contribs)78,741 edits →NPOV: commentNext edit → | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| :Can't it? ] is the rebuttal. --] <sup>]</sup> 05:23, 24 January 2009 (UTC) | :Can't it? ] is the rebuttal. --] <sup>]</sup> 05:23, 24 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
| ::Excuse me? I have no idea what are you talking about and why do you refer to another article on this talk page. In case you do have ideas how to go about the article you mentioned, please address those ideas at the relevant talk page.--] (]) 05:39, 24 January 2009 (UTC) | ::Excuse me? I have no idea what are you talking about and why do you refer to another article on this talk page. In case you do have ideas how to go about the article you mentioned, please address those ideas at the relevant talk page.--] (]) 05:39, 24 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
| :::I suggest you look at the AfD for Putinjugend, because apparently it is totally ok to have articles built out of fringe terms which are used only to disparage the subject. eSStonia is widely used in Russia, there is no denying that, and there are reasons behind it, such as at the time of the "desecration" of the Bronze Soldier there were movements in Estonia for the "honouring" of its NAZI past with memorials to the SS. Frankly, I would prefer that no such articles existed on WP, but there is obviously a push by some to use WP to fling as much shit as possible, but so long as there are sources which give eSStonia notability, and Putinjugend demonstrates that. --] <sup>]</sup> 05:47, 24 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 05:47, 24 January 2009
From the Economist article...
After a fortnight in which Estonia's enemies made clever use of the cheap jibe that the country is oozing with nostalgia for the Waffen SS by spelling the country's name as eSStonia, the president's surname as IlveSS and the prime minister's as AnSSip, it is encouraging to see a counter-attack.
--Russavia 01:58, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
NPOV
Any article on WP can't be just made out of "cheap jibe" like cited above. At minimum the article should also represent alternative perspectives pr WP:NPOV. Until it tells just about the "cheap jibe" side of the story, the article is sorry to say, nothing more or less than an example of WP:TEDIOUS.--Termer (talk) 05:17, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
- Can't it? Putinjugend is the rebuttal. --Russavia 05:23, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
- Excuse me? I have no idea what are you talking about and why do you refer to another article on this talk page. In case you do have ideas how to go about the article you mentioned, please address those ideas at the relevant talk page.--Termer (talk) 05:39, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
- I suggest you look at the AfD for Putinjugend, because apparently it is totally ok to have articles built out of fringe terms which are used only to disparage the subject. eSStonia is widely used in Russia, there is no denying that, and there are reasons behind it, such as at the time of the "desecration" of the Bronze Soldier there were movements in Estonia for the "honouring" of its NAZI past with memorials to the SS. Frankly, I would prefer that no such articles existed on WP, but there is obviously a push by some to use WP to fling as much shit as possible, but so long as there are sources which give eSStonia notability, and Putinjugend demonstrates that. --Russavia 05:47, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
- Excuse me? I have no idea what are you talking about and why do you refer to another article on this talk page. In case you do have ideas how to go about the article you mentioned, please address those ideas at the relevant talk page.--Termer (talk) 05:39, 24 January 2009 (UTC)