| Revision as of 03:42, 21 April 2008 editBetacommandBot (talk | contribs)931,490 editsm subst'ing Template:Welcome← Previous edit | Revision as of 06:27, 30 January 2009 edit undoBrusegadi (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers7,059 edits Warning: Potentially violating the three revert rule on Arnoldo Aleman. using TWNext edit → | ||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
| ==Removal of sourced material== | ==Removal of sourced material== | ||
| Please be more judicious about removing material from articles, in particular material that is supported by ] such as national newspapers-of-record. Note also that the ] is an "electric fence" and not an entitlement. Editors may be blocked for ] or ] even though 3RR has not formally been violated. I hope you can work with other editors involved in the ] toward consensus solutions. ] 19:25, 6 August 2007 (UTC) | Please be more judicious about removing material from articles, in particular material that is supported by ] such as national newspapers-of-record. Note also that the ] is an "electric fence" and not an entitlement. Editors may be blocked for ] or ] even though 3RR has not formally been violated. I hope you can work with other editors involved in the ] toward consensus solutions. ] 19:25, 6 August 2007 (UTC) | ||
| == January 2009 == | |||
| ] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]{{#if:Arnoldo Aleman|  according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, '''you may be ] from editing'''. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. If necessary, pursue ]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ''Please note that 3RR is not a right, it is a privilege. You may be blocked by an admin even if you do not violate the rule. '' ] (]) 06:27, 30 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 06:27, 30 January 2009
Welcome!
Hello, Spartanad, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Brusegadi 21:51, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
Arnoldo
Please discuss the changes you make in the talk page. I have left reasons for my changes in the talk page; so you should see it. Also, I do not know what inflammatory adjectives you are referring to. Brusegadi 19:58, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
"reverted weasel terms" would be considered inflammatory by most!
- This is probably because you are not familiar with WP:AWT. Sorry if I offended you, I do not mean to do that, but I hope that now you know what I meant. Also, please look at WP:AGF. Take care, Brusegadi 20:54, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
Hello, please read WP:3RR.Brusegadi 20:39, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
Discussion of Arnoldo Alemán article
Discussions with regard to editing of articles should not take place on user pages but instead on the article's talk page, where the issues will be seen by other editors interested in the article. Raymond Arritt 15:49, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
Biography of Living Person's policy
Please read over WP:BLP, especially this, which states "In the case of significant public figures, there will be a multitude of reliable, third-party published sources to take material from, and Misplaced Pages biographies should simply document what these sources say. If an allegation or incident is notable, relevant, and well-documented by reliable published sources, it belongs in the article — even if it's negative and the subject dislikes all mention of it. If it is not documented by reliable third-party sources, leave it out." Notmyrealname 19:08, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
Removal of sourced material
Please be more judicious about removing material from articles, in particular material that is supported by reliable sources such as national newspapers-of-record. Note also that the three-revert rule is an "electric fence" and not an entitlement. Editors may be blocked for edit warring or disruptive editing even though 3RR has not formally been violated. I hope you can work with other editors involved in the Arnoldo Alemán toward consensus solutions. Raymond Arritt 19:25, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
January 2009
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Arnoldo Aleman. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Please note that 3RR is not a right, it is a privilege. You may be blocked by an admin even if you do not violate the rule. Brusegadi (talk) 06:27, 30 January 2009 (UTC)