Misplaced Pages

User talk:Antman: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 00:13, 17 October 2005 editSpace Cadet (talk | contribs)8,095 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 21:44, 29 October 2005 edit undoSpace Cadet (talk | contribs)8,095 edits Welcome back!Next edit →
Line 34: Line 34:


I am dealing with policy. And ] was just a name of a Polish province. ] 00:13, 17 October 2005 (UTC) I am dealing with policy. And ] was just a name of a Polish province. ] 00:13, 17 October 2005 (UTC)

== Welcome back! ==
It's good to see you again! How is your sockpuppet Schwartz und Weiss doing? I hope everything is fine with you guys. I haven't heard from either one of you for a while, now. ] 21:44, 29 October 2005 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:44, 29 October 2005

Rawr

User pages

Vandalization

"Stop vandalizing historical German articles with modern Polish names, before I start adding a German touch to the Polish wiki. Stay on your own Wiki. Antman 20:55, 16 October 2005 (UTC)"

I'm American, so I am on my Wiki. Unlike you. Space Cadet 22:46, 16 October 2005 (UTC)

I don't care. You are purposely adding a Polish-bias to articles, and I am going to stop it one way or another. Consider yourself warned by the template. Antman 22:47, 16 October 2005 (UTC)

I hate Polish bias just as much as you do. What are you talking about? Space Cadet 22:55, 16 October 2005 (UTC)

You are spitting in the face of policy established by the Danzig/Gdansk nomenclature debate. Antman 22:55, 16 October 2005 (UTC)

No I'm not. Space Cadet 23:06, 16 October 2005 (UTC)

How aren't you? You have consistantly reverted usages of the word Danzig to the current Polish (not English, in the United States, as you should know, it is still colloqually known as Danzig) term Gdańsk, in articles which are based post-1308 and pre-1945. How are you not violating policy? Antman 23:09, 16 October 2005 (UTC)

Let me educate you on this: It used to be known as "Danzig" during the Cold War. But for over 15 years it's "Gdańsk". Do me a favor: go and sign up for a library card, grab Britannica and try to find "Danzig" even for the short historical period when the city actually belonged to Germany. Get back to me with the results. In the meantime try to do something constructive rather than vandalize articles about Polish provinces or cities. Space Cadet 23:21, 16 October 2005 (UTC)

"The usages of Danzig in these articles is referring to a time when it was known as DANZIG and was owned by Germany (or a German state). And a short historical period? I suppose 700 years isn't long enough to matter, considering Poland has only (re)existed for less than 100 years. Stop editing historical articles in an attempt to bias them -- you can't change history. Antman 23:28, 16 October 2005 (UTC)"

Polish: 980 - 1308, 1466 - 1792, 1945 - 2005 German: 1871 - 1918

So there! Space Cadet 23:39, 16 October 2005 (UTC)

And the poll says *-1308 and 1945-* is Polish. The Poll defines policy. Deal with it. Antman 23:43, 16 October 2005 (UTC)

Deal with what? Show me your 700 years. Space Cadet 23:49, 16 October 2005 (UTC)

Deal with policy. Also, 1466-1792? That was part of Prussia then. Antman 23:58, 16 October 2005 (UTC)

I am dealing with policy. And Royal Prussia was just a name of a Polish province. Space Cadet 00:13, 17 October 2005 (UTC)

Welcome back!

It's good to see you again! How is your sockpuppet Schwartz und Weiss doing? I hope everything is fine with you guys. I haven't heard from either one of you for a while, now. Space Cadet 21:44, 29 October 2005 (UTC)