| Revision as of 13:05, 21 January 2009 editOreo Priest (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users17,364 edits →Medieval cuisine: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 09:35, 4 February 2009 edit undoNil Einne (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers73,122 edits →Medieval cuisineNext edit → | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| Hi. I am doubting the claim that the modern term dry to describe wine comes from the humours. -''']''' <sup>]</sup> 13:05, 21 January 2009 (UTC) | Hi. I am doubting the claim that the modern term dry to describe wine comes from the humours. -''']''' <sup>]</sup> 13:05, 21 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
| == IRC == | |||
| I have clarified the comment about IRC. I will not however be withdrawing my comment about the terms negro or 'nigger'. It was a fair comment. You are apparently unwilling to accept that the term homosexual is offensive in the context, whereas gay is relatively neutral. It is your right to feel however you feel about the terminilogy, but that is as irrelevant as the people who try to argue that negro or 'nigger' are equivalent to black or African-American. We stick with what the sources say and use, and the sources say and use that homosexual is likely to be considered offensive and that gay is preferred. ] (]) 09:35, 4 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 09:35, 4 February 2009
 Archives | |
|
|
AfD on Cuisine of Dominica
The article, Cuisine of Dominica has been nominated for deletion as being non-notable. You can participate in the discussion here. --Jeremy ( Blah blah...) 03:25, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Just say no to no
Given what you wrote at Talk:No, you might like to see Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/No (2nd nomination). Uncle G (talk) 21:23, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
Medieval cuisine
Hi. I am doubting the claim that the modern term dry to describe wine comes from the humours. -Oreo Priest 13:05, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
IRC
I have clarified the comment about IRC. I will not however be withdrawing my comment about the terms negro or 'nigger'. It was a fair comment. You are apparently unwilling to accept that the term homosexual is offensive in the context, whereas gay is relatively neutral. It is your right to feel however you feel about the terminilogy, but that is as irrelevant as the people who try to argue that negro or 'nigger' are equivalent to black or African-American. We stick with what the sources say and use, and the sources say and use that homosexual is likely to be considered offensive and that gay is preferred. Nil Einne (talk) 09:35, 4 February 2009 (UTC)