| Revision as of 22:08, 7 February 2009 editTundrabuggy (talk | contribs)2,973 edits →Latest ANE thingy: changed gender according to latest notice← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:16, 8 February 2009 edit undoPhilKnight (talk | contribs)Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators125,347 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 264: | Line 264: | ||
| I wrote to Sandstein's page for clarification regarding the first notice put up and he said it was not in the proper format. When I suggested a format he said that was not correct either. By that token it strikes me that my banning from the article was not in the proper format either, so I've asked him to please take a look at my earlier banning in the archive and see how that differs. He seemed to think Cerejota's comment should have been taken to ANI rather than ANE. I really can't see why mine was adjudicated there if his was not. Anyway, keep an eye on his page, maybe we will learn something about finding our way around the maze of courtrooms, lol. I'm not big on drama, but if I'm being thrust into it against my will, I might as well go to drama school. ] (]) 22:07, 7 February 2009 (UTC) | I wrote to Sandstein's page for clarification regarding the first notice put up and he said it was not in the proper format. When I suggested a format he said that was not correct either. By that token it strikes me that my banning from the article was not in the proper format either, so I've asked him to please take a look at my earlier banning in the archive and see how that differs. He seemed to think Cerejota's comment should have been taken to ANI rather than ANE. I really can't see why mine was adjudicated there if his was not. Anyway, keep an eye on his page, maybe we will learn something about finding our way around the maze of courtrooms, lol. I'm not big on drama, but if I'm being thrust into it against my will, I might as well go to drama school. ] (]) 22:07, 7 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
| == Notification == | |||
| Hi Brewcrewer, I appreciate you're aware of these restrictions, however, just to confirm: | |||
| As a result of ], the ] has acknowledged long-term and persistent problems in the editing of articles related to the ], broadly understood. As a result, the Committee has enacted broad ], described ] and below. | |||
| *Any uninvolved administrator may, on his or her own discretion, impose sanctions on any editor working in the area of conflict if, despite being warned, that editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. | |||
| *The sanctions imposed may include blocks of up to one year in length; bans from editing any page or set of pages within the area of conflict; bans on any editing related to the topic or its closely related topics; restrictions on reverts or other specified behaviors; or any other measures which the imposing administrator believes are reasonably necessary to ensure the smooth functioning of the project. | |||
| *Prior to any sanctions being imposed, the editor in question shall be given a warning with a link to this decision; and, where appropriate, should be counseled on specific steps that he or she can take to improve his or her editing in accordance with relevant policies and guidelines. | |||
| *Discretionary sanctions imposed under the provisions of this decision may be appealed to the imposing administrator, the appropriate administrators' noticeboard (currently ]), or the Committee. | |||
| These editing restrictions may be applied to any editor for cause, provided the editor has been previously informed of the case. This message is to so inform you. This message does not necessarily mean that your current editing has been deemed a problem; this is a template message crafted to make it easier to notify any user who has edited the topic of the existence of these sanctions. | |||
| Generally, the next step, if an administrator feels your conduct on pages in this topic area is disruptive, would be a warning, to be followed by the imposition of sanctions (although in cases of serious disruption, the warning may be omitted). Hopefully no such action will be necessary. | |||
| This notice is only effective if given by an administrator and logged ]. ] (]) 16:16, 8 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:16, 8 February 2009
Roof knockingWell, it looks like things worked out with the AFD on roof knocking! WacoJacko (talk) 02:16, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
SorryNo need to apologize, but thanks anyway. It happens on articles like that. --Tocino 22:01, 15 January 2009 (UTC) Your kind welcomeHi brewcrewer, Thank you for your welcome message which though I'm sure was written with the best intentions is moderately patronising. After all, I did sign my comment, it's not the first wikipedia article I've ever edited, and as I'm sure you would agree it's not up to anybody to bestow on people editing permission of articles without logging in! 93.97.36.253 (talk) 00:16, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Chesley Sullenberger A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Chesley Sullenberger, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Misplaced Pages is not" and Misplaced Pages's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Edison (talk) 02:21, 16 January 2009 (UTC) ITN awardsThanks for leaving the note. It appears I forgot to do that. Usually, I look through the history and see which editors add the most content to the article. Thanks for reminding me...I'll go do that now. Spencer 15:04, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
Child Museum of CairoExpanded. Dun't anybody know better than to doubt baldy? Dr. Blofeld 15:27, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
Heheh! Dr. Blofeld 20:34, 18 January 2009 (UTC) Clarence ThomasThanks for taking this on. I've made the change to the page -- Samir 22:49, 18 January 2009 (UTC) Dirty BirdsSauteed bird in the evening smells even better than Smelly Sox. StarM 23:33, 18 January 2009 (UTC) Willis McGahee microwaved children? source.I just thought i would let you know since you seemed to have made some changes on that page. the last section says "In January 2006, McGahee drew controversy when a woman claimed that he had microwaved her children. He has been faced with two other similar lawsuits over a three year span. Genetic testing proved that McGahee was the father of both children." I think thats probably vandalism, i couldnt find anything on the internet about microwaving children. I didnt want to change anything because i didnt know for sure. thanks Brendan —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.246.40.155 (talk) 15:03, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Tell JuhfiyehThanks for correcting my tagging mistake on Tell Juhfiyeh. I'm pretty sure I meant to put up a "expand" tag, but put up the alternative name for "cleanup" ("improve") instead. Either a typo, or a brainfart, but either way thanks for catching it! Jo7hs2 (talk) 19:33, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for your supportThank you for your support on the noticeboard and on Cyde's talk page. It is much appreciated. Tundrabuggy (talk) 23:27, 19 January 2009 (UTC) Barack Obama 2009 presidential inaugurationRe : Please see the explanation I provided here for why the title should, according to the MoS, not be in boldface. It's understandable that some assume every article title must be repeated in boldface in the article lead, but it's really hypercorrection. I'd greatly appreciate it if you'd reconsider and return it to the MoS-compatible version. 78.34.134.183 (talk) 04:15, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
Girls eh?You missed my 2008 Olympic welcome home parade set. In my archives, 97-99 I think? There used to be a race for women IIRC but they got rid of it. YellowMonkey (click here to vote for world cycling's #1 model!) 04:36, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Sorry, but
Added one per request....YellowMonkey (click here to vote for world cycling's #1 model!) 00:56, 22 January 2009 (UTC) TDUFor your amusement? (I hope.) Pdfpdf (talk) 15:13, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
RfA thankspam
Denbot (talk) 22:40, 21 January 2009 (UTC) Opinion requestedRegarding: this edit. Pdfpdf (talk) 12:04, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
I have noticedI have noticed that when you search the name David Wright, you go to a list of different David Wrights. I don't really think this is good because David Wright(baseball) is probobly to best known David Wright. I don't know how to fix this, could you either tell me or do it for me? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mgmets5 (talk • contribs) 01:21, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
MediationPer Samir's suggestion at Misplaced Pages:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2009-01/Clarence Thomas, I've filed a mediation request at Misplaced Pages:Requests for mediation/Clarence Thomas. Thanks for trying... Simon Dodd (talk) 04:30, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
Steve SomersGot your message. Help would be much appreciated. The WFAN reference names a lot of TV work he did (some of it is still in the talk page). I'm not sure where to incorporate it, so if you have time, take a stab at it. Thanks. SERSeanCrane (talk) 06:55, 25 January 2009 (UTC) WelcomedThanks for the welcome. I'm just tidying up spelling and grammar errors as I procastinate by reading random articles. Might as well be slightly productive as I waste my time! Right, let's try this 4 tilda thing... Bigger digger (talk) 00:25, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
Re. re your comments at RPP for Gary ShawHello Brewcrewer. I saw the comments on the IP's talk page. If he returns, please report to me or another admin right away. Now I cannot semi-protect an article that was vandalized just once since September. Regards, Húsönd 19:21, 28 January 2009 (UTC) And thanks again....for your support. It is very much appreciated. Tundrabuggy (talk) 15:17, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
I am reminded of the Lewis Carroll verses from Father William. `You are old,' said the youth, `and your jaws are too weak For anything tougher than suet; Yet you finished the goose, with the bones and the beak-- Pray how did you manage to do it?' 'In my youth,' said his father, `I took to the law, And argued each case with my wife; And the muscular strength, which it gave to my jaw, Has lasted the rest of my life.' In my old age I shall be able to finish the goose. :) Shalom — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tundrabuggy (talk • contribs) thank you
RfA thanksThank you for the trust you placed in me by supporting my RfA (which passed and, apparently, I am now an admin!). I will do my best to continue to act in a way that is consistent with the policies of wikipedia as well with our common desire to build and perfect this repository of human knowledge; and can only hope that you never feel that your trust was misplaced. Thanks again! --Regent's Park (Rose Garden) 23:57, 2 February 2009 (UTC) questionHello, While you and I have disagreed quite a bit on that one article, I would like to ask you if you think I have made any comment that could be perceived as antisemitic. Feel free to say what you want here, I will not hold it against you in any way. I would like to know because I do not consider myself an anti-semite and if I have ever given that impression I would very much like to correct it. Thanks, Nableezy (talk) 00:39, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Antisemitic incidents alleged to be related to the 2008–2009 Israel–Gaza conflictHi Brewcrewer, you commented on the talk page of the admin who closed this discussion as delete. I wanted to let you know that I put the deletion up for review. As far as I know, any editor can comment there, and your input would be welcome. Happy editing. Jalapenos do exist (talk) 01:02, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
Notification of arbitration enforcementI am concerned by your comments on Wikifan12345's talk page and I have raised the matter at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration enforcement. Please see WP:AE#User:Wikifan12345 and User:Brewcrewer. -- ChrisO (talk) 01:14, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
My comments at Gaza conflictTechnically it would be ad hominems. But I don't get it. What's the attack? Saying I welcomed their input? That they got themselves blocked? --JGGardiner (talk) 07:19, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
regarding Albert Hammond, Jr.Hey Brewcrewer. It has come to my attention that you have moved the page Albert Hammond, Jr. recently, and in my opinion the page move was made in a hurry without everyone's consensus over the matter, so I have decided that a discussion will be taking place to discuss about the page move, if you have any reason to support the page move that you've made earlier, feel free to post it in the discussion page, best of wishes, no harm intended, peace. Signed, kotakkasut 08:59, 5 February 2009 (UTC) South Park MexicanThere is a dispute, and I am personally curious about what the right thing is to be done, on the South Park Mexican article. Should his child molestation conviction be noted in the introductory paragraph? I really don't know. I hope you can help (like you did on the Recluse article, thank you). Belasted (talk) 04:09, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
No content in Category:Swedish Sunni Muslims To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:Swedish Sunni Muslims, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 04:35, 6 February 2009 (UTC) Soap Opera Rapid Aging SyndromeI hate to bother you again, but since you deleted the list in the Recluse article, I thought you'd a good person to discuss this with. Check out the examples list in the Soap Opera Rapid Aging Syndrome article. What do you say, get rid of it? Belasted (talk) 22:36, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
Well, wouldn't you agree that the list is a bit huge? Perhaps it should be separate from the main article? Belasted (talk) 05:14, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
ThanksThanks for the comment. No hard feelings. I guess I was trying to be ironic on the article talk and maybe I said it poorly. I guess that's what happens when you edit so late at night. About the general problem, I'm Canadian so hockey metaphors come to my mind easily. So if you'll indulge me: A lot of hockey players will think that a referee is biased and sometimes they are. Sometimes it seems that the ref will call a little hook or slash against one team but allow it when the other team does it. As a player you can get mad at the double-standard but that won't do anything. The best way to deal with it is to make sure you don't give the ref an excuse to call a penalty in the first place. I don't think any editors were on their best behaviour at the article. Or maybe a few that I could count on one hand. I think that a few got away with little slashes here and there. We should all do better and especially those who feel the refs don't like them. Cheers. --JGGardiner (talk) 09:05, 7 February 2009 (UTC) Rachel CorrieSorry about causing a commotion at the R.C. article. Malcolm Schosha (talk) 19:51, 7 February 2009 (UTC) Latest ANE thingyI wrote to Sandstein's page for clarification regarding the first notice put up and he said it was not in the proper format. When I suggested a format he said that was not correct either. By that token it strikes me that my banning from the article was not in the proper format either, so I've asked him to please take a look at my earlier banning in the archive and see how that differs. He seemed to think Cerejota's comment should have been taken to ANI rather than ANE. I really can't see why mine was adjudicated there if his was not. Anyway, keep an eye on his page, maybe we will learn something about finding our way around the maze of courtrooms, lol. I'm not big on drama, but if I'm being thrust into it against my will, I might as well go to drama school. Tundrabuggy (talk) 22:07, 7 February 2009 (UTC) NotificationHi Brewcrewer, I appreciate you're aware of these restrictions, however, just to confirm: As a result of an arbitration case, the Arbitration committee has acknowledged long-term and persistent problems in the editing of articles related to the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, broadly understood. As a result, the Committee has enacted broad editing restrictions, described here and below.
These editing restrictions may be applied to any editor for cause, provided the editor has been previously informed of the case. This message is to so inform you. This message does not necessarily mean that your current editing has been deemed a problem; this is a template message crafted to make it easier to notify any user who has edited the topic of the existence of these sanctions. Generally, the next step, if an administrator feels your conduct on pages in this topic area is disruptive, would be a warning, to be followed by the imposition of sanctions (although in cases of serious disruption, the warning may be omitted). Hopefully no such action will be necessary. This notice is only effective if given by an administrator and logged here. PhilKnight (talk) 16:16, 8 February 2009 (UTC) |
