| Revision as of 17:57, 19 February 2009 editYaan (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers8,934 edits ←Created page with 'No real sources unless you count primary ones, or "Smith, p. 4711" or "Cambridge History of China, vol. 11" without page number, a some rather strange claims (like …' | Revision as of 17:58, 19 February 2009 edit undoYaan (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers8,934 editsmNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| No real sources unless you count primary ones, or "Smith, p. 4711" or "Cambridge History of China, vol. 11" without page number |
No real sources unless you count primary ones, or "Smith, p. 4711" or "Cambridge History of China, vol. 11" without page number. Some rather strange claims (like Chinese conquered the ]), a somewhat unclear reference to the ] who were far from dominating in the area at the time - and whose exact ethnic affiliations are not really as clear as that strange reference seems to imply - and a lot of stuff that has no obvious relation to Mongolia at all. Most of the content for this article has been removed from ] a while ago (like by myself or by someone else). Valid content - for several decades in the 7th century, the Göktürks were subjects of the Tang dynasty - is treated much better in ], ] and ]. ] (]) 17:57, 19 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
| :*'''Turn into redirect''' to ]. This seems more appropriate than the others, even if just because of the word "Mongolia" being contained in the article title. ] (]) 17:57, 19 February 2009 (UTC) | :*'''Turn into redirect''' to ]. This seems more appropriate than the others, even if just because of the word "Mongolia" being contained in the article title. ] (]) 17:57, 19 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 17:58, 19 February 2009
No real sources unless you count primary ones, or "Smith, p. 4711" or "Cambridge History of China, vol. 11" without page number. Some rather strange claims (like Chinese conquered the Russian steppe), a somewhat unclear reference to the Khitan people who were far from dominating in the area at the time - and whose exact ethnic affiliations are not really as clear as that strange reference seems to imply - and a lot of stuff that has no obvious relation to Mongolia at all. Most of the content for this article has been removed from Han Chinese a while ago (like here by myself or here by someone else). Valid content - for several decades in the 7th century, the Göktürks were subjects of the Tang dynasty - is treated much better in Tang Dynasty#Turkish and Western regions, History of Mongolia#Turkic_Period and Göktürks. Yaan (talk) 17:57, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
- Turn into redirect to History of Mongolia#Turkic_Period. This seems more appropriate than the others, even if just because of the word "Mongolia" being contained in the article title. Yaan (talk) 17:57, 19 February 2009 (UTC)