Revision as of 16:59, 27 February 2009 editIkip (talk | contribs)59,234 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:08, 27 February 2009 edit undoToddst1 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors137,716 edits →Exhibiting bad faith - final warning: I suggest you both walk away from this article and each other. This was also suggested at ANI by other administrators.Next edit → | ||
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
You recently deleted two relevant questions on your talk page about your behavior from this uninvolved administrator from your talk page without answering them: , yet continue to hound another user with questions like . Given that you have requested that the editor involved never edit your talk page, your continual hounding of this editor is frankly, ] and ]. You will be blocked if this or any other disruptive behavior like this continues. ] <small>(])</small> 16:38, 27 February 2009 (UTC) | You recently deleted two relevant questions on your talk page about your behavior from this uninvolved administrator from your talk page without answering them: , yet continue to hound another user with questions like . Given that you have requested that the editor involved never edit your talk page, your continual hounding of this editor is frankly, ] and ]. You will be blocked if this or any other disruptive behavior like this continues. ] <small>(])</small> 16:38, 27 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
:I moved it to the talk page discussed, my edit history reflects that. Fram is not an "univolved editor" he is actively pursued an opposite stance on my position on numerous pages. I appreciate it if you strike these false accusations, as you are completely incorrect. I find your accusations of "bad faith", with a threat "final warning" especially when you are incorrect, personally offensive. ] (]) | :I moved it to the talk page discussed, my edit history reflects that. Fram is not an "univolved editor" he is actively pursued an opposite stance on my position on numerous pages. I appreciate it if you strike these false accusations, as you are completely incorrect. I find your accusations of "bad faith", with a threat "final warning" especially when you are incorrect, personally offensive. ] (]) | ||
::I don't see any answers to my questions, but I do see your hounding of THF. Feel free to be offended but better yet, change your behavior. ] <small>(])</small> 16:52, 27 February 2009 (UTC) | ::I don't see any answers to my questions, but I do see your hounding of {{user|THF}}. Feel free to be offended but better yet, change your behavior. ] <small>(])</small> 16:52, 27 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
:::Since you have taken the role of impartial adminstrator/diplomat, which can be clearly seen in the way that you treat me and THF equally, can you remove the hidden tag that THF added ]? And ask THF to answer at least one of the questions I pose to him? | :::Since you have taken the role of impartial adminstrator/diplomat, which can be clearly seen in the way that you treat me and THF equally, can you remove the hidden tag that THF added ]? And ask THF to answer at least one of the questions I pose to him? | ||
:::To reinforce that you are an imparital adminstrator/diplomat, I would appreciate an apology, and a removal of the personal attacks and threats to me. ] (]) 16:59, 27 February 2009 (UTC) | :::To reinforce that you are an imparital adminstrator/diplomat, I would appreciate an apology, and a removal of the personal attacks and threats to me. ] (]) 16:59, 27 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
::::As an outsider to this conflict, I'm not going to edit the article. My comments are neither a threat or an attack. Rather, they're an observation, and a request for a modification of your behavior. You've already been to ANI. I don't see a need to go to WQA, rather, go directly to blocks at this point. I suggest you both walk away from this article and each other. This was also suggested at ANI by other administrators. |
Revision as of 17:08, 27 February 2009
edit • view | |
This user is on wikivacation. I disabled e-mail.
|
Awards and articles I created. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Misplaced Pages:Bureaucrats'_noticeboard/RfA_Report
Best welcome template: User:AxG/WikiWelcome1 wikipediareview: History of wikipedia |
User:C3: Colorectal Cancer Coalition
Instead of hassling me, why don't you go take a look at what happened to User:C3: Colorectal Cancer Coalition. OK they created a promotional article and I tagged it for deletion but they also said they were willing to adjust the article. I thought perhaps I could help because there do seem to be some reliable sources about it, but when I get back I find that they've been indefinitely blocked for "spam", which seems pretty fricken' brutal if you ask me. Nerfari (talk) 21:05, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
Covert US Regime Change Action
You changed the title of this article without consulting anyone. The title before your changed it covered all such actions by the US, and did not focus on the CIA. Since there are secret operations, sometimes it's difficult to point to any particular US agency. Also, the article should not focus on the CIA as an institution but on the actual operations and their effects on the ground.
Please revert. In future, please propose all such major changes on the article talk page before making change. Thanks.--NYCJosh (talk) 00:06, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
Exhibiting bad faith - final warning
You recently deleted two relevant questions on your talk page about your behavior from this uninvolved administrator from your talk page without answering them: , yet continue to hound another user with questions like "Are you refusing to answer? I would like to understand the reasoning and logic". Given that you have requested that the editor involved never edit your talk page, your continual hounding of this editor is frankly, uncivil and harrassing. You will be blocked if this or any other disruptive behavior like this continues. Toddst1 (talk) 16:38, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
- I moved it to the talk page discussed, my edit history reflects that. Fram is not an "univolved editor" he is actively pursued an opposite stance on my position on numerous pages. I appreciate it if you strike these false accusations, as you are completely incorrect. I find your accusations of "bad faith", with a threat "final warning" especially when you are incorrect, personally offensive. Ikip (talk)
- I don't see any answers to my questions, but I do see your hounding of THF (talk · contribs). Feel free to be offended but better yet, change your behavior. Toddst1 (talk) 16:52, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
- Since you have taken the role of impartial adminstrator/diplomat, which can be clearly seen in the way that you treat me and THF equally, can you remove the hidden tag that THF added Talk:Business_Plot#Deleted_material_of_User:THF? And ask THF to answer at least one of the questions I pose to him?
- To reinforce that you are an imparital adminstrator/diplomat, I would appreciate an apology, and a removal of the personal attacks and threats to me. Ikip (talk) 16:59, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
- As an outsider to this conflict, I'm not going to edit the article. My comments are neither a threat or an attack. Rather, they're an observation, and a request for a modification of your behavior. You've already been to ANI. I don't see a need to go to WQA, rather, go directly to blocks at this point. I suggest you both walk away from this article and each other. This was also suggested at ANI by other administrators.
- I don't see any answers to my questions, but I do see your hounding of THF (talk · contribs). Feel free to be offended but better yet, change your behavior. Toddst1 (talk) 16:52, 27 February 2009 (UTC)