| Revision as of 14:53, 2 March 2009 editජපස (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers60,451 edits →Reported violations of arbitration decisions for enforcement: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:44, 2 March 2009 edit undoPhilKnight (talk | contribs)Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators125,473 edits NotificationNext edit → | ||
| Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
| I have reported your actions at ] to ] for enforcement. See ]. ] (]) 14:53, 2 March 2009 (UTC) | I have reported your actions at ] to ] for enforcement. See ]. ] (]) 14:53, 2 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
| ==] == | |||
| As a motion amending the above-named Arbitration case, the ] has acknowledged long-term and persistent problems in the editing of articles related to pseudoscience. As a result, the Committee has enacted broad ], described ] and below. | |||
| *Any uninvolved administrator may, on his or her own discretion, impose sanctions on any editor working in the area of conflict if, despite being warned, that editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. | |||
| *The sanctions imposed may include blocks of up to one year in length; bans from editing any page or set of pages within the area of conflict; bans on any editing related to the topic or its closely related topics; restrictions on reverts or other specified behaviors; or any other measures which the imposing administrator believes are reasonably necessary to ensure the smooth functioning of the project. | |||
| *Prior to any sanctions being imposed, the editor in question shall be given a warning with a link to this decision; and, where appropriate, should be counseled on specific steps that he or she can take to improve his or her editing in accordance with relevant policies and guidelines. | |||
| *Discretionary sanctions imposed under the provisions of this decision may be appealed to the imposing administrator, the appropriate administrators' noticeboard (currently ]), or the Committee. | |||
| These editing restrictions may be applied to any editor for cause, provided the editor has been previously informed of the case. This message is to so inform you. This message does not necessarily mean that your current editing has been deemed a problem; this is a template message crafted to make it easier to notify any user who has edited the topic of the existence of these sanctions. | |||
| Generally, the next step, if an administrator feels your conduct on pages in this topic area is disruptive, would be a warning, to be followed by the imposition of sanctions (although in cases of serious disruption, the warning may be omitted). Hopefully no such action will be necessary. | |||
| This notice is only effective if given by an administrator and logged ]. ] (]) 15:44, 2 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:44, 2 March 2009
| Email Me | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| CAM Portal | ||||||||
| Wikiproject on Alternative Medicine | ||||||||
| We are always looking for editors interested in participating in our project. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
Richmond, Virginia, USA, Planet Earth, The Sun,
Milky Way galaxy
Welcome to my talk page.
This is John's talk page. The civility requirement of Misplaced Pages applies to ALL posting on my user talk page. Nasty, rude, angry, hostile, threatening, indecisive, juvenile chatter, and / or impolite comments, or postings by editors that I just plain do not like because they have NOT been nice will be ignored.
Welcome back
Hi John, may I ask why my user name is on your user page? Thanks and have a good day, --CrohnieGal 20:49, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
- Thank you. Yes, you may. It is not there now. I had copied the starting point for my user page in part from another user. -- John Gohde (talk) 23:59, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
- Ok thanks, that's what I was thinking. My user page had helped another gather links and such when getting started. I was just curious. I hope it helped, please feel free to snag whatever you would like from there. I need them to refer to things because I forget easily so it makes things easier for me to have the list to remind me. Have a good day, happy and healthy editing, --CrohnieGal 13:32, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
Let's shake hands
Hi John. I just want to check in with you and share some thoughts. While we obviously don't always agree on many things regarding alternative medicine, I want to reassure you that I do not have, and never have had, any intentions to improperly delete or downplay the existence of alternative medicine subjects at Misplaced Pages. They exist, and Misplaced Pages's job includes documenting the real world, including alternative medicine. You have done an amazing job at creating many things on the subject. I might not agree with some POV issues with some of them, but the basic idea of creating some of them is impressive.
The situation that occurred when you returned (related to the List of alternative medicine subjects which I started) was unfortunate. I'm sorry about that. I didn't even know that the list you had created - Index of topics in alternative medicine - existed, and I definitely had no intention of competing with it or with the Glossary of alternative medicine which you also started. The very fact that I created the list should indicate that I wasn't attempting to do any disservice to the subject, but was in fact making it more accessible to editors and readers. "Imitation is the greatest form of flattery" would apply, IF I had known about your original list. We both saw a need and were apparently thinking alike on that one! I hope we're okay and can edit together, and even when we disagree, that we can do it agreeably. -- Fyslee (talk) 03:21, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- I am inclined to believe that I was likewise correct on the areas in which we disagree on. It is fine with me. I would just like to see more favorable voting from you in the days to come. -- John Gohde (talk) 23:40, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Reported violations of arbitration decisions for enforcement
I have reported your actions at Orthomolecular psychiatry to WP:AE for enforcement. See this. ScienceApologist (talk) 14:53, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Pseudoscience
As a motion amending the above-named Arbitration case, the Arbitration committee has acknowledged long-term and persistent problems in the editing of articles related to pseudoscience. As a result, the Committee has enacted broad editing restrictions, described here and below.
- Any uninvolved administrator may, on his or her own discretion, impose sanctions on any editor working in the area of conflict if, despite being warned, that editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process.
- The sanctions imposed may include blocks of up to one year in length; bans from editing any page or set of pages within the area of conflict; bans on any editing related to the topic or its closely related topics; restrictions on reverts or other specified behaviors; or any other measures which the imposing administrator believes are reasonably necessary to ensure the smooth functioning of the project.
- Prior to any sanctions being imposed, the editor in question shall be given a warning with a link to this decision; and, where appropriate, should be counseled on specific steps that he or she can take to improve his or her editing in accordance with relevant policies and guidelines.
- Discretionary sanctions imposed under the provisions of this decision may be appealed to the imposing administrator, the appropriate administrators' noticeboard (currently WP:AE), or the Committee.
These editing restrictions may be applied to any editor for cause, provided the editor has been previously informed of the case. This message is to so inform you. This message does not necessarily mean that your current editing has been deemed a problem; this is a template message crafted to make it easier to notify any user who has edited the topic of the existence of these sanctions.
Generally, the next step, if an administrator feels your conduct on pages in this topic area is disruptive, would be a warning, to be followed by the imposition of sanctions (although in cases of serious disruption, the warning may be omitted). Hopefully no such action will be necessary.
This notice is only effective if given by an administrator and logged here. PhilKnight (talk) 15:44, 2 March 2009 (UTC)