Misplaced Pages

If you are not blocked from editing the sandbox then the autoblock on your IP address has already expired and you can resume editing. --Jayron32.talk.contribs 22:20, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

{{unblock-ip|...}}

NO NO. Please read and follow ALL Of the steps above. Don't just paste that template from above, read and follow ALL of the instructions, in order. It is important because if you don't do it exactly right, we can't help you fix this problem! --Jayron32.talk.contribs 22:44, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

I would rather people not know where I work, and dont want topost my IP. CENSEI (talk) 14:44, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Well, then we cannot help unblock you. Sorry, but there is nothing we can do if you don't do this. If you are concerned, I can delete any evidence of your IP address once you have been unblocked, but unless we know what the problematic IP block is, we cannot fix it to allow you to edit. --Jayron32.talk.contribs 18:08, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

I emailed the blocking admin with all the information. Hopefully that clears things up. CENSEI (talk) 18:39, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

I got your email. The IP address you sent is NOT currently blocked, autoblocked, or rangeblocked. Please check to see if you still cannot edit. If you are still having trouble, please email unblock-en-l@lists.wikimedia.org and reference this talk page. Please tell them EVERYTHING and EVERY DETAIL so that they can help unblock you. --Jayron32.talk.contribs 23:43, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Edit warring at Martin Luther King article

You were warned before about edit warring at that article: . Please do not continue to edit war over the inclusion (or not) of the tags in the article. If you continue to do so, and especially if you continue to call the edits of those whom you disagree with vandalism, you may be blocked yet again for edit warring. If you are having trouble, please seek outside help to solve the problem, as described in WP:DR. Please not that being "right" is not an allowable reason for edit warring. So please do not continue to repeatedly force your version of an article on others. --Jayron32.talk.contribs 04:33, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

IP

I have granted your account an exemption from IP blocking. This will allow you to edit through full blocks affecting your IP address when you are logged in.

Please read the page Misplaced Pages:IP block exemption carefully, especially the section on IP block exemption conditions.

Note in particular that you are not permitted to use this newly-granted right to edit Misplaced Pages via anonymous proxies, or disruptively. If you do, or there is a serious concern of abuse, then the right may be removed by any administrator.

I hope this will enhance your editing, and allow you to edit successfully and without disruption. -- Avi (talk) 19:50, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. CENSEI (talk) 20:14, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

Che (film)

Please see the talk page for my comments. Thanks   Redthoreau (talk)RT 15:52, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Cyber stalking warning

You are bird-dogging all the edits I make, trying to provoke an edit war and then 3RR me. I can easily show this to an admin with the diffs. I suggest you stop doing it. Get a life. ► RATEL ◄ 01:50, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Feel free to do so if you think it is necessary, but as explained to me, your edit history is open for all to see for a reason, and its pretty clear that you don’t apply the criteria for inclusion in all the articles you edit. CENSEI (talk) 01:52, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

I think I'll have to ask for an IP check. This is andyvphil redux. I see you started this account right after he was banned too. Hmmm. ► RATEL ◄ 02:37, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Well, you'd better have better evidence than "I thin so", and it appears that Andyvphil is still editing so he was never banned. CENSEI (talk) 02:43, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Blocked for 3RR

You were warned for reverting the article Matt Drudge repeatedly, a warning which you acknowledged receiving here: at 23:21 UTC. You reverted the article again here: one minute later. Sonce you show no signs of wishing to end the edit war, I have blocked you for a day. When your block expires, please do not return to edit war over this article, or you may be blocked again. --Jayron32.talk.contribs 01:21, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Taunting at my talkpage

I have rolled back your taunting of Ratel at my talkpage. Please refrain from making any further such posts. H₂O Shipper 21:58, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

March 2009

CENSEI (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I did not perfom a full revert with the edit. It was a partial revert without the disputed material included. I made it clear on the BLP talkpage that I would wait until a third part was able to look into the sources before I was going to do anything with it. This block is not justifiable

Decline reason:

You had fair warning, and rather than taking it as a lenient warning thought it rather an opportunity to get in another revert. It is not exactly a new offence for you. I remember your name as one of the users edit-warring on Drudge Report and Matt Drudge not too long ago. This is a problem in your behaviour I think you'll need to address quite soon. Moreover, your request does not in deal adequately with the reason for your block; just looks like an attempt to game your way out of it with little reassurances to anyone performing the unblock. So for these reasons I'm declining it. Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 00:12, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• Note to CENSEI - Hi CENSEI, a revert, according to this, is "...any action, including administrative actions, that reverses the actions of other editors, in whole or in part..." (emphasis mine). Just thought I'd make that clear (I've also replied to your e-mail) in case you didn't know. But we'll leave it to the admin handling the unblock request. Scarian 23:34, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Topic ban

Based on your history of abusing Misplaced Pages as a political battleground, your lengthy block log, and your record of edit-warring and disruption, I'm issuing a topic ban from articles and other pages relating to Barack Obama, loosely construed. The term of the topic ban is 6 months and violations will lead to blocks. I've logged this under the terms of the Obama article probation and posted it to WP:AN/I, where it can be reviewed by other administrators. MastCell  05:10, 23 March 2009 (UTC)