Misplaced Pages

Thelema: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 04:59, 25 March 2009 editVassyana (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users15,130 editsm protection template← Previous edit Revision as of 03:43, 1 April 2009 edit undoVassyana (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users15,130 edits restore GA version as mediation starting pointNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Thelema''' is a philosophy of life based on the rule or law, ''"Do what thou wilt."'' The ideal of "Do what thou wilt" and its association with the word ''Thelema'' goes back to ], but was more fully developed<ref name=Moore>"Crowley is misunderstood if he is seen primarily as the teacher of a new path to liberation, his sexual yoga and the abbey as a means of imparting this, with the theory behind it boiled down to the crude schematism of paths to enlightenment. He was part of a greater, far more intelligible tradition. Thelema itself is a rationally intelligible ideal that goes back to Rabelais, via Sir Francis Dashwood. Crowley gave this distinguished western tradition a new degree of development." Moore, John S. in ''Chaos International'', Issue No. 17.</ref> and proselytized<ref name="SutinRab">Sutin, Lawrence. ''Do What Thou Wilt: A Life of Aleister Crowley'', p. 126. New York, NY: St. Martin's Griffin, 2002. ISBN 978-0312288976.</ref> by ],who founded a religion named '''Thelema''' based on this ideal. The word itself is the English transliteration of the ] noun {{unicode|θέλημα}}: "will", from the verb ''θέλω'': to will, wish, purpose. Early Christian writings use the word to refer to the will of God,<ref name="de sales">Pocetto, Alexander T. , retrieved July 20, 2006.</ref> the human will,<ref>e.g. {{bibleverse||John|1:12-13}}</ref> and even the will of God's opponent, the ].<ref>e.g. {{bibleverse|2|Timothy|2:26}}</ref>
{{for|the monastery in Sicily|Abbey of Thelema}}
{{pp-dispute|expiry=April 1, 2009}}
{{NPOV}}
'''Thelema''' is a religious<ref>Greer, John Michael. ''The New Encyclopedia of the Occult'', p. 478. Llewellyn Worldwide, 2003. ISBN 1567183360</ref> or philosophical<ref name="Adams1">Adams, Ron. in '']'', Vol. 3, No. 4, Spring Equinox 2004, pp. 71-78. Mentions "Philosophy of Thelema" and some conflicts, e.g. about the centrality of sex magick, p. 74-75.</ref><ref>The Heretic's Guide to Thelema by Gerald del Campo. "Thelema and its evolution as a magical and philosophical system." Megalithica Books, 2008. ISBN: 978-1905713189</ref> system based on the rule or law, ''"Do what thou wilt,"'' from ]'s 1904 '']''.<ref name="brit1">Journal of British Studies 36 (January 1997): 99-133 (no 1) "Its byword, painted above the door, was the Rabelaisian 'Do What Thou Wilt.' This was taken from Crowley's Book of the Law..." p. 125. fn. 61.</ref> The word itself is the English transliteration of the ] noun {{unicode|θέλημα}}: "will", from the verb ''θέλω'': to will, wish, purpose.


In the ], ] used ''Thélème'', the French form of the word, as the name of a fictional Abbey in his famous books, '']''.<ref name=Rabelais>Rabelais, François. ''Gargantua and Pantagruel''. Everyman's Library. ISBN 978-0679431374</ref><ref name=Wilson>"The origin of 'Do what though wilt' is Rabelais' Abbey of Thelema in ''Gargantua and Pantagruel''. The Hell Fire Club was deliberately copying Rabelais. Crowley, of course, had read Rabelais and undoubtedly knew about the Hell Fire Club (which is more correctly called the Abbey of Saint Francis, by the way), but he claimed to have received the Law of Thelema ... from a Higher Intelligence which contacted him in Cairo in 1904." Wilson, Robert Anton. ''The Illuminati Papers''. Ronin Publishing, 1997. ISBN 1579510027</ref> The only rule of this Abbey was
The system that Crowley developed from the Book includes ideas from ]ism, ], and both Eastern and Western ] (especially the ]).<ref>Crowley, Aleister., retrieved July 7, 2006. For confirmation that the order in question took the Book of the Law as an official document of the order that "may be changed not so much as the style of a letter," by Aleister Crowley. "This book is the foundation of the New Aeon, and thus of the whole of our Work." First section, list of Class "A" Publications, retrieved July 7, 2006. And finally, for the part calling Thelema the word of the Law: ''Liber AL vel Legis'', I:39-40 as well as Crowley, Aleister. "De Lege Libellum", in ''The Equinox'' III(1) (Detroit: Universal, 1919). retrieved March 20, 2009.</ref><ref name="astral">"Appendix: Notes on the nature of the 'Astral Plane'", in ''Magick in Theory and Practice'', relates Thelema to “magick” and specifically to the practice of distinguishing independent entities on the Astral Plane from phantasms: "These mirror-mirages are therefore not Works of Magick, according to the Law of Thelema: the true Magick of Horus requires the passionate union of opposites...One must therefore insist that any real appearance of the Astral Plane gives the sensation of meeting a stranger." Online version retrieved July 19, 2006 from http://www.hermetic.com/crowley/aba/app3.html</ref> People have interpreted and applied Crowley’s work in widely different ways,<ref name="Adams1" /><ref>Wilson, R.A. Cosmic Trigger p.161.</ref><ref>"It is this synthesis of Eastern and Western occult traditions with modern scientific method that is probably Crowley's major achievement." Wilson, R. A. Cosmic Trigger p. 61.</ref><ref name=Moore>"Crowley is misunderstood if he is seen primarily as the teacher of a new path to ], his sexual yoga and the abbey as a means of imparting this, with the theory behind it boiled down to the crude schematism of paths to enlightenment, often understood as a ]. He was part of a greater, far more intelligible tradition. Thelema itself is a rationally intelligible ideal that goes back to Rabelais, via Sir Francis Dashwood. Crowley gave this distinguished western tradition a new degree of development." Moore, John S. in ''Chaos International'', Issue No. 17.</ref><ref name="EIUC">Wilson, R. A. with Miriam Joan Hill, ''Everything is Under Control: Conspiracies, cults and cover-ups'', HarperPerennial 1998. ISBN 0-06-273417-2. Kenneth Grant vs Israel Regardie p. 134. Grant's alien claim "widely shared in occult circles," p. 212.</ref> sometimes leading to harsh disagreements.<ref name="evil">Wilson, R.A. Cosmic Trigger p166.</ref><ref name="Miller">Miller, Jason. in ''Silver Star: A Journal of New Magick'', Issue 8, Fall Equinox, 2007, p. 32</ref>

In the 16th century, ] used ''Thélème'', the French form of the Greek word, as the name of a fictional Abbey in his famous books, '']''.<ref name=Rabelais>Rabelais, François. {{gutenberg|no=1200|name=Gargantua and Pantagruel}}</ref> Thelema and ''The Book of the Law'' refer back to this work.<ref name=Alamantra>One author talks of the "literary reference" and goes on to write, "Therefore, we can say, by this definition, a Thelemite is a person who is free, well-born, well-bred and capable of interacting in honest company. A Thelemite has an inherent sense of honour and a sense of proportion and discretion. ... Much of Crowley's work is an interpretation and extension of this simple summary." Alamantra, Frater. in '']'', Vol. 3, No. 4, Spring Equinox 2004, pp. 39-59</ref><ref name="brit1" /><ref name=Wilson>"The origin of 'Do what though wilt' is Rabelais' Abbey of Thelema in ''Gargantua and Pantagruel''. The Hell Fire Club was deliberately copying Rabelais. Crowley, of course, had read Rabelais and undoubtedly knew about the Hell Fire Club (which is more correctly called the Abbey of Saint Francis, by the way), but he claimed to have received the Law of Thelema ... from a Higher Intelligence which contacted him in Cairo in 1904." Wilson, Robert Anton. ''The Illuminati Papers''. Ronin Publishing, 1997. ISBN 1579510027</ref> The only rule of the Abbey was
"fay çe que vouldras" <!-- please do not "fix" this quote; it is a direct quote in archaic French. Thanks --> "fay çe que vouldras" <!-- please do not "fix" this quote; it is a direct quote in archaic French. Thanks -->
("''Fais ce que tu voudras''," or, "''Do what thou wilt''" or "''do that which you want''" (literally) ). In the mid 18th century, ] inscribed it on a doorway of his ] abbey at ],<ref name=EB>Encyclopedia Britannica (1911). ''Buckingham''.</ref><ref name=IAO131>IAO131. in '']'', Vol. 1, No. 1, Autumn 2007, pp. 18-32</ref><ref name=Adams>"Francis Dashwood, who revived the Rablelais 'Abbey of Thelema'..." Adams, Ron. in '']'', Vol. 3, No. 4, Spring Equinox 2004, pp. 71-78</ref><ref name="scrolls">"Many years later, Sir Francis Dashwood revived the Abbey and its delightful law in the grounds of his country residence not far from London.", "In more recent history Saint Aleister Crowley, who did much to reform and revive the Western Occult Tradition, in reverence to the Rabelaisian masterpiece also revived the Thelemic Law; and even, for a short period, established an Abbey on an Italian island.", "It may be new to those who read this manuscript, but the identical rule or law has been held in the highest respect in India and neighboring countries for thousands of years. It has been the amoral philosophy of the Nathas, Tantriks, and Siddha saints and sadhus. It made possible the Parivrajaka or homeless wanderer saints, and eventually led to the highest grade of Indian spiritual attainment known as Avadhoota or emancipated one. Thus Rabelais, Dashwood, and Crowley must share the honor of perpetuating what has been such a high ideal in most of Asia." Mahendranath (1990).</ref> where it served as the motto of ].<ref name=EB /> So ], in speaking of "''svecchachara''", the Sanskrit equivalent of the phrase ''"Do what thou wilt"'',<ref>"Svecchacara " John, Jeffrey. ''Esalen: America and the Religion of No Religion'', p. 430. University of Chicago Press, 2007. ISBN 0226453693</ref><ref>"The guiding tenet of this religious philosophy is svecchacara, do as you please," Singh, Kapur; Singh, Piar; Kaur, Madanjit. ''Pārāśarapraśna: an enquiry into the genesis and unique character of the order of the Khalsa with an exposition of the Sikh tenets'', p. 16. Amritasar: Dept. of Guru Nanak Studies, Guru Nanak Dev University, 1989.</ref><ref>"Such an one is a Svechacari whose way is Svechacara or 'do as you will'." Woodroffe, John. ''Shakti and Shakta'', ch. 27. ISBN 1595479201</ref> wrote that "Rabelais, Dashwood, and Crowley must share the honor of perpetuating what has been such a high ideal in most of Asia."<ref name="scrolls" /> ("''Fais ce que tu veux''," or, "''Do what thou wilt''"). This rule was revived and used in the ] in the mid ] by ], who inscribed it on a doorway of his abbey at ],<ref name=EB>Encyclopedia Britannica (1911). ''Buckingham''.</ref><ref name=IAO131>IAO131. in ''Journal of Thelemic Studies'', Vol. 1, No. 1, Autumn 2007, pp. 18-32</ref><ref name=Adams>"Francis Dashwood, who revived the Rablelais 'Abbey of Thelema'..." Adams, Ron. in '']'', Vol. 3, No. 4, Spring Equinox 2004, pp. 71-78</ref><ref name="scrolls">"Many years later, Sir Francis Dashwood revived the Abbey and its delightful law in the grounds of his country residence not far from London.", "In more recent history Saint Aleister Crowley, who did much to reform and revive the Western Occult Tradition, in reverence to the Rabelaisian masterpiece also revived the Thelemic Law; and even, for a short period, established an Abbey on an Italian island.", "It may be new to those who read this manuscript, but the identical rule or law has been held in the highest respect in India and neighboring countries for thousands of years. It has been the amoral philosophy of the Nathas, Tantriks, and Siddha saints and sadhus. It made possible the Parivrajaka or homeless wanderer saints, and eventually led to the highest grade of Indian spiritual attainment known as Avadhoota or emancipated one. Thus Rabelais, Dashwood, and Crowley must share the honor of perpetuating what has been such a high ideal in most of Asia." Mahendranath (1990).</ref> where it served as the motto of ].<ref name=EB />


The same rule was used in ] by ]<ref name="scrolls" /><ref name=Skinner>Skinner, Stephen (ed). ''The Magical Diaries of Aleister Crowley: Tunisia 1923'', p.149, n. 12. Weiser, 1996. ISBN 0877288569</ref><ref name=Alamantra>"Therefore, we can say, by this definition, a Thelemite is a person who is free, well-born, well-bred and capable of interacting in honest company. A Thelemite has an inherent sense of honour and a sense of proportion and discretion. ... Much of Crowley's work is an interpretation and extension of this simple summary." Alamantra, Frater. in '']'', Vol. 3, No. 4, Spring Equinox 2004, pp. 39-59</ref> in '']''. This book contains both the phrase "Do what thou wilt" and the word ''Thelema'' in Greek, which Crowley took for the name of the philosophical, mystical and religious system which he subsequently developed. This system includes ideas from ]ism, ], and both Eastern and Western ] (especially the ]).<ref>Crowley, Aleister., retrieved July 7, 2006. For confirmation that the order in question took the Book of the Law as an official document of the order that "may be changed not so much as the style of a letter," by Aleister Crowley. "This book is the foundation of the New Aeon, and thus of the whole of our Work." First section, list of Class "A" Publications, retrieved July 7, 2006. And finally, for the part calling Thelema the word of the Law: Crowley, Aleister. ''Liber AL vel Legis'', I:39-40</ref>
{{Thelema}}

], in speaking of '']'', the Sanskrit equivalent of the phrase ''"Do what thou wilt"'',<ref>"Svecchacara " John, Jeffrey. ''Esalen: America and the Religion of No Religion'', p. 430. University of Chicago Press, 2007. ISBN 0226453693</ref><ref>"The guiding tenet of this religious philosophy is svecchacara, do as you please, and its psychological justification is grounded in the profound Hindu psycho-analytical insight" Singh, Kapur; Singh, Piar; Kaur, Madanjit. ''Pārāśarapraśna: an enquiry into the genesis and unique character of the order of the Khalsa with an exposition of the Sikh tenets'', p. 16. Amritasar: Dept. of Guru Nanak Studies, Guru Nanak Dev University, 1989.</ref><ref>"Such an one is a Svechacari whose way is Svechacara or 'do as you will'." Woodroffe, John. ''Shakti and Shakta'', ch. 27. ISBN 1595479201</ref> wrote that "Rabelais, Dashwood, and Crowley must share the honor of perpetuating what has been such a high ideal in most of Asia."<ref name="scrolls" />

] is one of the common symbols of Thelema]]


==Historical background== ==Historical background==
The word ''θέλημα'' (thelema) is of some consequence in the original ], referring to divine and human will. One well-known example is from “The Lord’s Prayer” in {{bibleverse||Matthew|6:10}}, “Your kingdom come. Your will (''θέλημα'') be done, On earth as it is in heaven.” Some other quotes from the Bible are: The word θέλημα (thelema) is of some consequence in the original ], referring to divine and human will. One well-known example is from “The Lord’s Prayer” in {{bibleverse||Matthew|6:10}}, “Your kingdom come. Your will (Θελημα) be done, On earth as it is in heaven.” Some other quotes from the Bible are:


<blockquote>He went away again a second time and prayed, saying, "My Father, if this cannot pass away unless I drink it, Your will be done." —{{bibleverse||Matthew|26:42}}</blockquote> <blockquote>He went away again a second time and prayed, saying, "My Father, if this cannot pass away unless I drink it, Your will be done." —{{bibleverse||Matthew|26:42}}</blockquote>
Line 19: Line 18:
<blockquote>But as many as received Him, to them He gave the right to become children of God, even to those who believe in His name, who were born, not of blood nor of the will of the flesh nor of the will of man, but of God. —{{bibleverse||John|1:12-13}}</blockquote> <blockquote>But as many as received Him, to them He gave the right to become children of God, even to those who believe in His name, who were born, not of blood nor of the will of the flesh nor of the will of man, but of God. —{{bibleverse||John|1:12-13}}</blockquote>


<blockquote>And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, so that you may prove what the ] is, that which is good and acceptable and perfect. —{{bibleverse||Romans|12:2}}</blockquote> <blockquote>And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, so that you may prove what the will of God is, that which is good and acceptable and perfect. —{{bibleverse||Romans|12:2}}</blockquote>


<blockquote>…and they may come to their senses and escape from the snare of the ], having been held captive by him to do his will. —{{bibleverse|2|Timothy|2:26}}</blockquote> <blockquote>…and they may come to their senses and escape from the snare of the devil, having been held captive by him to do his will. —{{bibleverse|2|Timothy|2:26}}</blockquote>


<blockquote>Worthy are You, our Lord and our God, to receive glory and honor and power; for You created all things, and because of Your will they existed, and were created. —{{bibleverse||Revelation|4:11}}</blockquote> <blockquote>Worthy are You, our Lord and our God, to receive glory and honor and power; for You created all things, and because of Your will they existed, and were created. —{{bibleverse||Revelation|4:11}}</blockquote>


In the 5th century, ] wrote "Love, and do what you will" (''Dilige et quod vis fac'') in his Sermon on {{bibleverse|1|John|7}}, {{bibleverse-nb|1|John|8}}.<ref>Augustine of Hippo <cite>Sermon on 1 John 7, 8</cite> Cf. Augustine ''On Galatians 6:1'': "And if you shout at him, love him inwardly; you may urge, wheedle, rebuke, rage; '''love, and do whatever you wish'''. A father after all, doesn’t hate his son; and if necessary, a father gives his son a whipping; he inflicts pain, to insure well-being. So that’s the meaning of ''in a spirit of mildness'' (Gal. 6:1).” Sermon 163B:3:1, ''The Works of Saint Augustine: A New Translation for the 21st Century'', (Sermons 148-153), 1992, part 3, vol. 5, p. 182. ISBN 1565480074</ref> In the ], ] wrote "Love, and do what you will" (''Dilige et quod vis fac'') in his Sermon on {{bibleverse|1|John|7}}, {{bibleverse-nb|1|John|8}}.<ref>Augustine of Hippo <cite>Sermon on 1 John 7, 8</cite> Cf. Augustine ''On Galatians 6:1'': "And if you shout at him, love him inwardly; you may urge, wheedle, rebuke, rage; '''love, and do whatever you wish'''. A father after all, doesn’t hate his son; and if necessary, a father gives his son a whipping; he inflicts pain, to insure well-being. So that’s the meaning of ''in a spirit of mildness'' (Gal. 6:1).” Sermon 163B:3:1, ''The Works of Saint Augustine: A New Translation for the 21st Century'', (Sermons 148-153), 1992, part 3, vol. 5, p. 182. ISBN 1565480074</ref>


In the ], a character named "Thelemia" represents will or desire in the '']'' of the Dominican monk ]. Colonna's work was, in turn, a great influence on the ] monk ], whose '']'' includes an ''Abbey of Thélème''. In the ], a character named "Thelemia" represents will or desire in the '']'' of the Dominican monk ]. Colonna's work was, in turn, a great influence on the ] monk ], whose '']'' includes an ''Abbey of Thélème''.


===Rabelais' Thélème=== ===Rabelais' Thélème===
]
{{synthesis}}
] was a ] and later a ] monk of the ]. Eventually he left the monastery to study medicine, and so moved to ] in ]. It was there that he wrote ''],'' a connected series of books. They tell the story of two giants—a father (Gargantua) and his son (Pantagruel) and their adventures—written in an amusing, extravagant, and satirical vein.
]]]
] was a ] and later a ] monk of the 16th century. Eventually he left the monastery to study medicine, and so moved to ] in 1532. It was there that he wrote ''],'' a connected series of books. They tell the story of two giants—a father (Gargantua) and his son (Pantagruel) and their adventures—written in an amusing, extravagant, and satirical vein.


It is in the first book (ch. 52-57) where Rabelais writes of the ], built by the giant Gargantua. It pokes fun at the monastic institutions, since his abbey has a swimming pool, maid service, and no clocks in sight.<ref name=Rabelais /> It is in the first book (ch. 52-57) where Rabelais writes of the ], built by the giant Gargantua. It pokes fun at the monastic institutions, since his abbey has a swimming pool, maid service, and no clocks in sight.<ref name=Rabelais />
Line 47: Line 45:
</poem></blockquote> </poem></blockquote>


But below the humour was a very real concept of utopia and the ideal society.<ref>Stillman, Peter G. "Utopia and Anti-Utopia in Rousseau's Thought" in Rubin & Stroup (1999), p. 60</ref> Rabelais gives us a description of how the Thélèmites of the Abbey lived and the rules they lived by: But below the humour was a very real concept of utopia and the ideal society.<ref>Stillman, Peter G. "Utopia and Anti-Utopia in Rousseau's Thought" in Rubin & Stroup (1999), p. 60</ref> Rabelais gives us a description of how the Thelemites of the Abbey lived and the rules they lived by:


<blockquote>All their life was spent not in laws, statutes, or rules, but according to their own free will and pleasure. They rose out of their beds when they thought good; they did eat, drink, labour, sleep, when they had a mind to it and were disposed for it. None did awake them, none did offer to constrain them to eat, drink, nor to do any other thing; for so had Gargantua established it. In all their rule and strictest tie of their order there was but this one clause to be observed, <blockquote>All their life was spent not in laws, statutes, or rules, but according to their own free will and pleasure. They rose out of their beds when they thought good; they did eat, drink, labour, sleep, when they had a mind to it and were disposed for it. None did awake them, none did offer to constrain them to eat, drink, nor to do any other thing; for so had Gargantua established it. In all their rule and strictest tie of their order there was but this one clause to be observed,


:Do What Thou Wilt; :'''''Do What Thou Wilt;'''''


because men that are free, well-born, well-bred, and conversant in honest companies, have naturally an instinct and spur that prompteth them unto virtuous actions, and withdraws them from vice, which is called honour. Those same men, when by base subjection and constraint they are brought under and kept down, turn aside from that noble disposition by which they formerly were inclined to virtue, to shake off and break that bond of servitude wherein they are so tyrannously enslaved; for it is agreeable with the nature of man to long after things forbidden and to desire what is denied us.<ref name=Rabelais /></blockquote> because men that are free, well-born, well-bred, and conversant in honest companies, have naturally an instinct and spur that prompteth them unto virtuous actions, and withdraws them from vice, which is called honour. Those same men, when by base subjection and constraint they are brought under and kept down, turn aside from that noble disposition by which they formerly were inclined to virtue, to shake off and break that bond of servitude wherein they are so tyrannously enslaved; for it is agreeable with the nature of man to long after things forbidden and to desire what is denied us.<ref name=Rabelais /></blockquote>


Some scholars argue that ] influenced Rabelais, and that the French author wrote from a specifically Christian perspective.{{fact}} In particular, Alexander Pocetto of the Allentown College of St. Francis de Sales draws many parallels between Rabelais and ].<ref name="de sales" /> ] disagrees, writing that the revolutionary thing about Rabelais' way of thinking "is not his opposition to Christianity, but the freedom of vision, feeling and thought which his perpetual playing with things produces, and which invites the reader to deal directly with the world and its wealth of phenomena. On one point, to be sure, Rabelais takes a stand, and it is a stand which is basically anti-Christian; for him, the man who follows his nature is good, and natural life, be it of men or things, is good..."<ref>Aeurbach, Erich (1946). ''Mimesis: The Representation of Reality in Western Literature'' (50th Aniv. Edition). Princeton University Press, 2003. ISBN 978-0691113364</ref>
Most scholars think the French author wrote from a specifically Christian perspective,<ref name="syn1">David LaGuardia, "Doctor Rabelais and the Medicine of Scatology," Ch3 in ''Fecal Matters in Early Modern Literature and Art: Studies in Scatology'', Studies in European Cultural Transition Vol 21. Published Ashgate 2004. "Scholars are agreed that one must read these concrete and visceral passages of Rabelais in the most abstract of terms: the physical purgation of the body is an exact analog of the spiritual purgation of the soul." p25. "The religious and theological context for Rabelais's seemingly scandalous preoccupation with scatology has, therefore, been well documented in the scholarly literature on the subject." p27. Article quote at p36.</ref><ref name="syn2">David Bagchi, "The German Rabelais? Foul Words and the Word in Luther," in ''Reformation and Renaissance Review, 7.2/7.3'' (Double Issue), Abstract. "Luther is infamous for his use of scatological language, but Luther scholars (with the notable exception of Heiko Oberman) have not attempted to relate his use of scatology to his theology. This contrasts strongly with Rabelais scholarship, in which the theological significance of the Frenchman’s scatology is widely acknowledged."</ref><ref name="syn3">"Rabelais and his Critics," ''Doreen B. Townsend Occasional Papers 10'', Natalie Zemon Davis mentions scholarly consensus on existence of his program of Christian Humanism, p19. , retrieved March 20, 2009.</ref><ref name="screech">"in 1959...Screech was writing against the view first articulated by ] but still widely defended at the time that Rabelais was a closet freethinker... ] has recently shown that Rabelais set out to write a Christian antiepic," according to Benson, Edward, writing in ''Sixteenth Century Journal Vol. 28'', No. 3 (Autumn, 1997), pp. 961-963. Review of the book ''Rabelais and the Challenge of the Gospel: Evangelism, Reformation, Dissent'' by Michael Screech. Baden-Baden: &Eacute;ditions Valentin Koerner, 1992.</ref><ref>Rigolot, Francois, "Rabelais, misogyny, and Christian charity: biblical intertextuality and the Renaissance crisis of exemplarity." ''PMLA v. 109'' (March 1994) p. 225-37</ref><ref name="med">Williams, Alison. Sick humour, healthy laughter: the use of medicine in Rabelais's jokes. The Modern Language Review 101 pt3 671-81 Jl 2006.</ref><ref>Nash, J. C. 'Fictional Evil and the Reader's Seduction: Rabelais's Creations of "l'Esprit Maling".' ''Romanic Review v. 93'' no. 4 (November 2002) p. 369-86 see also cited sources Griffin & Screech</ref><ref name="calvin">Krause, V. "Idle works in Rabelais' Quart livre: the case of the Gastrolatres." ''The Sixteenth Century Journal v. 30'' no. 1 (Spring 1999) p. 47-60</ref><ref>Russell, A. P. Epic agon and the strategy of reform in Folengo and Rabelais. Comparative Literature Studies v. 34 no. 2 (1997) p. 119-48</ref><ref>Marsh, L. Of horns and words: a reading of Rabelais's signs. Romanic Review v. 88 (January 1997) p. 53-66. Reads Christian symbolism into "frozen words" event.</ref><ref name="mass">Weinberg, F. M. Layers of emblematic prose: Rabelais' Andouilles. The Sixteenth Century Journal v. 26 (Summer 1995) p. 367-77</ref>{{syn}} while pointing to disagreements with the Church.<ref name="med" /><ref name="calvin" />{{syn}} "It is evident from the scholarship devoted to Rabelais that his texts ultimately depict the Evangelical preoccupation with salvation and the true faith, and the need for good Christians to work toward the ideal Utopia of Christ's kingdom."<ref name ="syn1" /><ref name="syn3" />{{syn}} This applies even or especially to the author's scatological motif.<ref name ="syn1" /><ref name ="syn2" />{{syn}} Alexander Pocetto of the Allentown College of St. Francis de Sales argues that ] influenced Rabelais. He also draws many parallels between Rabelais and ].<ref>Pocetto, Alexander T. , retrieved July 20, 2006.</ref> ] emphasized the satirist's orthodox views.<ref name="screech" /> Another source has Rabelais mocking Luther and the Church from a reformist perspective: <blockquote>The informality of Rabelais' "masses" shows his agreement with ], who denounced the formalized ritual of the Roman Church as "Judaic." Most Humanists and reformers decried the fixed and convention-bound celebration of the Last Supper, calling it idolatry. Rabelais' masses therefore show the Pantagrueline companions communing with each other, partaking of the "bread" and the "wine."...Between radical reformers and arch conservatives in the Church, moderation is in danger of being crushed, and yet Pantagruel will maintain his ideals regardless of risk.<ref name="mass" /></blockquote>

This view of the author as a Christian Humanist did not always command such strong support. ] in 1946 wrote that the revolutionary thing about Rabelais' way of thinking was

<blockquote>not his opposition to Christianity, but the freedom of vision, feeling and thought which his perpetual playing with things produces, and which invites the reader to deal directly with the world and its wealth of phenomena. On one point, to be sure, Rabelais takes a stand, and it is a stand which is basically anti-Christian; for him, the man who follows his nature is good, and natural life, be it of men or things, is good...<ref>Aeurbach, Erich (1946). ''Mimesis: The Representation of Reality in Western Literature'' (50th Aniv. Edition). Princeton University Press, 2003. ISBN 978-0691113364</ref></blockquote>


===Francis Dashwood and the Hellfire Club=== ===Francis Dashwood and the Hellfire Club===
] adopted some of the ideas of Rabelais<ref name = Towers/><ref name="Kemp">Kemp, Betty. ''Sir Francis Dashwood: An Eighteenth-Century Independent''. Macmillan 1967. Article quotes p. 130-131, p. 134 respectively.</ref> and invoked the rule of Th&eacute;l&egrave;me when he founded a group called the Monks of ] (better known as ]).<ref name=EB /><ref name=Adams /><ref name="scrolls" /> An abbey was established at Medmenham, described in the ] as follows: ] adopted some of the ideas of Rabelais and invoked the same rule in French when he founded a group called the Monks of ] (better known as ]).<ref name=EB /><ref name=Adams /><ref name="scrolls" /> An abbey was established at Medmenham, described in the ] as follows:


<blockquote>At Medmenham, on the ] above ], there are fragments, incorporated into a residence, of a Cistercian abbey founded in 1201; which became notorious in the middle of the 18th century as the meeting-place of a convivial club called the "Franciscans" after its founder, ], afterwards Lord le Despencer (1708–1781), and also known as the "Hell-Fire Club," of which ], ] and other political notorieties were members. The motto of the club, ''fay ce que voudras'' (do what you will), inscribed on a doorway at the abbey, was borrowed from ]' description of the abbey of Thelema in '']''.<ref name=EB /></blockquote> <blockquote>At Medmenham, on the Thames above Marlow, there are fragments, incorporated into a residence, of a Cistercian abbey founded in 1201; which became notorious in the middle of the 18th century as the meeting-place of a convivial club called the Franciscans after its founder, Sir Francis Dashwood, afterwards Lord le Despencer (1708-1781), and also known as the Hell-Fire Club, of which John Wilkes, Bubb Dodington and other political notorieties were members. The motto of the club, fay Ce que voudras (do what you will), inscribed on a doorway at the abbey, was borrowed from Rabelais description of the abbey of Thelema in Gargantua.<ref name=EB /></blockquote>


We have little direct evidence of what Dashwood's Hellfire Club did or believed.<ref name="Kemp" /><ref name="bcy">Grand Lodge of British Columbia and Yukon. , retrieved July 22, 2006</ref> The one direct testimonial comes from ], a member who never got into the chapter-room of the inner circle.<ref>Coppens, Philip (2006). ''''. Retrieved July 21, 2006.</ref><ref name="bcy" /> He describes their origin as follows: We have little direct evidence of what Dashwood's Hellfire Club did or believed.<ref name="bcy">Grand Lodge of British Columbia and Yukon. , retrieved July 22, 2006</ref> The one direct testimonial comes from ], a member who never got into the chapter-room of the inner circle.<ref>Coppens, Philip (2006). ''''. Retrieved July 21, 2006.</ref><ref name="bcy" /> He describes their origin as follows:


<blockquote>A set of worthy, jolly fellows, happy disciples of Venus and Bacchus, got occasionally together to celebrate woman in wine and to give more zest to the festive meeting, they plucked every luxurious idea from the ancients and enriched their own modern pleasures with the tradition of classic luxury.<ref>quoted in Sainsbury (2006), p.111</ref></blockquote> <blockquote>A set of worthy, jolly fellows, happy disciples of Venus and Bacchus, got occasionally together to celebrate woman in wine and to give more zest to the festive meeting, they plucked every luxurious idea from the ancients and enriched their own modern pleasures with the tradition of classic luxury.<ref>quoted in Sainsbury (2006), p.111</ref></blockquote>


In the opinion of Lt.-Col. Towers, the group derived more from Rabelais than the inscription over the door: "My interpretation of the caves remains as stated, that they were used as a Dionysian oracular temple, based upon Dashwood’s reading of the relevant chapters of Rabelais."<ref name=Towers>Towers (1987) quoted in Coppens (2006)</ref> Others call the monks "simply hedonistic debauchers -- their rituals more satire than serious."<ref>T. Emery Heath, "Sir Francis Dashwood" in Ash&eacute; Journal p. 80.</ref> Historian Betty Kemp calls the debauchery an unwarranted speculation, "but on a very little fact, there has grown a vast superstructure, most of it so flimsy, fancy, and unsupported, that it cannot be dislodged."<ref name="Kemp" /> She calls the club's motto, The group derived more from Rabelais than the inscription over the door, in the opinion of Lt.-Col. Towers, who wrote "My interpretation of the caves remains as stated, that they were used as a Dionysian oracular temple, based upon Dashwood’s reading of the relevant chapters of Rabelais."<ref>Towers (1987) quoted in Coppens (2006)</ref>


] in his ''Historical Memoires'' (1815) accused the Monks of performing Satanic rituals, but these claims have been dismissed as hearsay.<ref name="bcy" /> Gerald Gardner and others such as Mike Howard<ref>Howard, Mike. , retrieved July 22, 2006</ref> say the Monks worshipped "the Goddess." Daniel Willens argued that the group likely practiced ], but also suggests Dashwood may have held secret Roman Catholic sacraments. He asks if Wilkes would have recognized a genuine Catholic Mass, even if he saw it himself and even if the underground version followed its public model precisely.<ref>Willens, Daniel. in '']'', summer 1992. Retrieved July 22, 2006</ref> The Grand Lodge of British Columbia and Yukon minimizes the connection with Freemasonry.<ref name="bcy" />
<blockquote>"an exhortation to honorable conduct, and consideration for others, not by enslavement to rules but by self-discipline...The taking of the Medmenham device from Rabelais would quite reasonably suggest that there was, in Dashwood, a disposition to mock monkishness, and a sympathy with the idea that true virtue consists in self-discipline rather than in obedience to rules: this is no more anti-religious than many religious reformers have been."<ref name="Kemp" /></blockquote>

] in his ''Historical Memoires'' (1815) accused the Monks of performing Satanic rituals, but these claims have been dismissed as hearsay.<ref name="bcy" /> ] and others such as Mike Howard<ref>Howard, Mike. , retrieved July 22, 2006</ref> say the Monks worshipped "the Goddess." Daniel Willens argued that the group likely practiced ], but also suggests Dashwood may have held secret Roman Catholic sacraments. He asks if Wilkes would have recognized a genuine Catholic Mass, even if he saw it himself and even if the underground version followed its public model precisely.<ref>Willens, Daniel. in '']'', summer 1992. Retrieved July 22, 2006</ref> The Grand Lodge of British Columbia and Yukon minimizes the connection with Freemasonry.<ref name="bcy" />


===Subsequent historical references=== ===Subsequent historical references===
Later, Sir ] and ] referred to Rabelais' Abbey of Thelema in their novel '']'' (1878), as did ] in his utopian romance ''The Building of Thelema'' (1910). Later, Sir ] and ] referred to Rabelais' Abbey of Thelema in their novel '']'' (1878), as did ] in his utopian romance ''The Building of Thelema'' (1910).


People living between Rabelais and Crowley sometimes used the word "Thelemites" to mean people who do as they please.<ref>"The Modern Thelemites", 29 October 1863. Published in ''Soldier and Scholar: Basil Lanneau Gildersleeve and the Civil War'' by Basil Lanneau Gildersleeve. University of Virginia Press, 1998. retrieved February 8, 2008.</ref> Sometimes they even used the term positively, but did so with some degree of secrecy and deniability.<ref>poem, ''The Ladies' Crambambull'', "by A Thelemite". Published in ''Tait's Edinburgh Magazine'' by William Tait, Christian Isobel Johnstone, 1841. retrieved February 8, 2008.</ref> People living between Rabelais and Crowley sometimes used the word "Thelemites" to mean people who do as they please.<ref>"The Modern Thelemites", 29 October 1863. Published in ''Soldier and Scholar: Basil Lanneau Gildersleeve and the Civil War'' by Basil Lanneau Gildersleeve. University of Virginia Press, 1998. retrieved February 8, 2008.</ref> Sometimes they even used the term positively, but did so with some degree of secrecy and deniability.<ref>poem, ''The Ladies' Crambambull'', "by A. Thelemite". Published in ''Tait's Edinburgh Magazine'' by William Tait, Christian Isobel Johnstone, 1841. retrieved February 8, 2008.</ref>


==Aleister Crowley's work== ==Aleister Crowley's work==
{{Thelema}}
] (1875&ndash;1947) was an English occultist, writer, and social provocateur. In 1904, he received<ref>Skinner, Stephen (ed). ''The Magical Diaries of Aleister Crowley: Tunisia 1923'', p. 15, n. 3. Weiser, 1996. ISBN 0877288569</ref> '']'', ], which was to serve as the foundation of the religious and philosophical system he called Thelema.<ref name=Wilson /><ref>Crowley, Aleister. "De Lege Libellum", in ''The Equinox'' III(1) (Detroit: Universal, 1919).</ref> Crowley summed up his Law of Thelema<ref>Crowley, Aleister. in ''The Equinox'' III(1) (Detroit: Universal, 1919), retrieved July 6, 2006</ref> in these phrases from the Book:
] (1875&ndash;1947) was an English occultist, writer, and social provocateur. Rabelais was one of Crowley's heroes<ref>Skinner, Stephen (ed). ''The Magical Diaries of Aleister Crowley: Tunisia 1923'', p. 79, n. 8. Weiser, 1996. ISBN 0877288569</ref> and his books ''Gargantua and Pantagruel'' may have provided Crowley with part of the philosophic basis for the Law of Thelema,<ref name=Skinner /><ref>Meretrix, Magdalene. in ''Witchvox'', July 14, 2001</ref><ref name=scrolls /><ref name=Alamantra /><ref name=Moore /> namely the phrase "Do what thou wilt".<ref>Skinner, p.149, n. 12</ref> In ''The Antecedents of Thelema'', Crowley referred to Rabelais as "Our Master",<ref name=Antecedents>Crowley, Aleister (1926). ''The Antecedents of Thelema'' in , retrieved July 4, 2006</ref> and Rabelais was also included among the ] along with ], ] and ].<ref>Crowley, Aleister. .</ref>

In ], Crowley claimed to have received '']'', ] from an entity named ], which was to serve as the foundation of the religious and philosophical system he called Thelema.<ref name=Wilson /><ref>Crowley, Aleister. "De Lege Libellum", in ''The Equinox'' III(1) (Detroit: Universal, 1919).</ref> Crowley summed up his Law of Thelema<ref>Crowley, Aleister. in ''The Equinox'' III(1) (Detroit: Universal, 1919), retrieved July 6, 2006</ref> in these phrases from the Book:


*"Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law"<ref>Crowley, Aleister. ''Liber AL vel Legis'', I:40</ref> *"Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law"<ref>Crowley, Aleister. ''Liber AL vel Legis'', I:40</ref>
Line 88: Line 83:
*"There is no Law beyond Do what thou wilt"<ref>Crowley, Aleister. Liber AL vel Legis'', III:60</ref> *"There is no Law beyond Do what thou wilt"<ref>Crowley, Aleister. Liber AL vel Legis'', III:60</ref>


] and others take an ecumenical view of this and find the central message of Thelema in the Christian works of Rabelais.<ref name="scrolls" /><ref name=Adams /><ref name=Alamantra /><ref name=Moore /> Rabelais was one of Crowley's heroes,<ref>Skinner, p. 79, n. 8.</ref> and appears among the ] along with historical figures like ], ] and ], as well as some less historical like ], ] and the God ].<ref>Crowley, Aleister. .</ref> ] and others have written that Crowley revived the Thelemic Law from Rabelais.<ref name="scrolls" /><ref name=Adams /><ref name=Alamantra /><ref name=Moore /> Aleister Crowley wrote in ''The Antecedents of Thelema'' (1926) that Rabelais "set forth in essence the Law of Thelema, very much as it is understood by the Master Therion himself," and further that "the masterpiece of Rabelais contains in singular perfection a clear forecast of the Book which was to be revealed by ] to ] 370 years later."<ref name=Antecedents /> But Crowley biographer Lawrence Sutin disagrees, writing that in his opinion,


<blockquote>Questions of prophecy aside, Rabelais was no precursor of Thelema. Joyous and unsystematic, Rabelais blended in his heterodox creed elements of Stoic self-mastery and spontaneous Christian faith and kindness.<ref name="SutinRab" /></blockquote>
Aleister Crowley wrote in ''The Antecedents of Thelema'' (1926) that Rabelais "set forth in essence the Law of Thelema, very much as it is understood by the Master Therion himself," and further that "the masterpiece of Rabelais contains in singular perfection a clear forecast of the Book which was to be revealed by ] to ] 370 years later."<ref name=Antecedents>Crowley, Aleister (1926). ''The Antecedents of Thelema'' in , retrieved July 4, 2006</ref> In support of this, Crowley cites a poem that Gargantua gives an explicit Christian interpretation in the text&mdash;one that scholars recognized as a true reading of this passage as early as 1854.<ref>The Works of Francis Rabelais, trans. and notated by Urquhart et al. P284, n3. , retrieved March 20, 2009.</ref> Another character in the text shows how one might interpret it differently and see oneself reflected therein, as in the tradition of Bible as mirror.<ref>''Rabelais in context'' By Barbara C. Bowen, Vanderbilt University, 1991. p71. , retrieved March 20, 2009.</ref> Crowley chose to literally see himself in this “prophecy”:

:Was the mighty spirit of ] aware of the prophetic fire of his immortal book? He has fortunately left us in no doubt upon this point; for he did not content himself with having created in parable that Abbey of Thelema which his eager gaze foresaw from the black abyss of those Ages not yet thrilled by the Morning Star of the Renaissance, and dimly heralded by the Wolf's Tail of the Reformation. He proceeded to envelop himself in the mist of oracular speech, to fulminate his light through dark sayings, to clothe the naked beauty of his Time-piercing thought in the pontifical vestments of prophecy. The reader of today plunged from the limped waters of his allegory into the glooming gulfs of sibylline and subterranean song, is startled indeed when, after repeated efforts to penetrate the mystery of his versicles, he perceives the adumbration of dim forms&mdash;and recognizes them, with something of terror, for the images of the events of this very generation of mankind! (...) A great flame will spring up, he says, and put an end to this flood. What clearer reference could be desired to the ] of Horus?<ref name=Antecedents />

Crowley biographer Lawrence Sutin points out that,

<blockquote>Questions of prophecy aside, Rabelais was no precursor of Thelema. Joyous and unsystematic, Rabelais blended in his heterodox creed elements of Stoic self-mastery and spontaneous Christian faith and kindness.<ref>Sutin, Lawrence. ''Do What Thou Wilt: A Life of Aleister Crowley'', p. 126. New York, NY: St. Martin's Griffin, 2002. ISBN 978-0312288976.</ref></blockquote>

With the possible exception of the word "heterodox", this assessment agrees with modern Rabelais scholarship.<ref name ="syn1" /><ref name ="syn2" /><ref name ="syn3" />{{syn}}


===''The Book of the Law''=== ===''The Book of the Law''===
]
{{main|The Book of the Law}} {{main|The Book of the Law}}
Crowley's system of Thelema begins with ''The Book of the Law'', which bears the official name ''Liber AL vel Legis''. It was written in ], ] during his honeymoon with his new wife ] (née Kelly). This small book contains three chapters, each of which he wrote in one hour, beginning at noon, on ], ], and ], ]. Crowley claims that he took dictation from an entity named ], whom he later identified as his own ].<ref>Crowley, Aleister. ''The Equinox of the Gods''. New Falcon Publications, 1991. ISBN 978-1561840281</ref> Disciple ] "prefers to say that Crowley reached depths of the human evolutionary unconscious unknown to either ] or ]," but opinions among Thelemites differ widely.<ref name="EIUC" /> Crowley's system of Thelema begins with ''The Book of the Law'', which bears the official name ''Liber AL vel Legis''. It was written in ], ] during his honeymoon with his new wife ] (née Kelly). This small book contains three chapters, each of which he wrote in one hour, beginning at noon, on ], ], and ], ]. Crowley claims that he took dictation from an entity named ], whom he later identified as his own ].<ref>Crowley, Aleister. ''The Equinox of the Gods''. New Falcon Publications, 1991. ISBN 978-1561840281</ref> However, an analysis by Dan Evans shows similarities not only with Rabelais, but also to ''The Beloved of Hathor and Shrine of the Golden Hawk'',<ref>Farr, F., & Shakespear, O. ''The Beloved of Hathor and the Shrine of the Golden Hawk''. Croydon. Farncombe & Son. Dating uncertain, approx. 1902</ref> a play by ].<ref>Evans, Dan. ''Aleister Crowley and the 20th Century Synthesis of Magick'', p. 10, pp. 26-30. Hidden Publishing, Second Revised Edition, 2007. ISBN 978-0-9555237-2-4</ref>

Besides the reference to Rabelais, an analysis by Dave Evans shows similarities to ''The Beloved of Hathor and Shrine of the Golden Hawk'',<ref>Farr, F., & Shakespear, O. ''The Beloved of Hathor and the Shrine of the Golden Hawk''. Croydon. Farncombe & Son. Dating uncertain, approx. 1902</ref> a play by ].<ref>Evans, Dave. ''Aleister Crowley and the 20th Century Synthesis of Magick'', p. 10, pp. 26-30. Hidden Publishing, Second Revised Edition, 2007. ISBN 978-0-9555237-2-4</ref> Evans says this may result from the fact that "both Farr and Crowley were thoroughly steeped in Golden Dawn imagery and teachings,"<ref>Dave Evans, "Strange distant Gods that are not dead today," p5</ref> and that Crowley probably knew the ancient materials that inspired some of Farr's motifs.<ref>Evans, Strange Gods p3</ref> Sutin also finds similarities between the works of Crowley and ], attributing this to "shared insight" and perhaps to the older man's knowledge of Crowley.<ref>Sutin p 68, 137-138</ref>


Crowley wrote several commentaries on ''The Book of the Law'', the last of which he wrote in 1925. This brief statement called simply "]" warns against the study of the Book and discussing its contents, and states that all "questions of the Law are to be decided only by appeal to my writings" and is signed ].<ref>Crowley, Aleister. ''Liber AL vel Legis''</ref> Crowley wrote several commentaries on ''The Book of the Law'', the last of which he wrote in 1925. This brief statement called simply "]" warns against the study of the Book and discussing its contents, and states that all "questions of the Law are to be decided only by appeal to my writings" and is signed ].<ref>Crowley, Aleister. ''Liber AL vel Legis''</ref> The only known writings of Ankh-af-na-khonsu appear on the ].


===True Will=== ===True Will===
{{main|True Will}} {{main|True Will}}
According to Crowley, every individual has a ''True Will'', to be distinguished from the ordinary wants and desires of the ]. The True Will is essentially one's "calling" or "purpose" in life. Some later magicians have taken this to include the goal of attaining ] by one's own efforts, without the aid of God or other divine authority. This brings them close to the position that Crowley held just prior to 1904.<ref name=UD>Frater U.D. ''High Magic: Theory & Practice''. Llewellyn Worldwide, 2005. p. 214. ISBN 0738704717</ref> According to Crowley, every individual has a ''True Will'', to be distinguished from the ordinary wants and desires of the ]. The True Will is essentially one's "calling" or "purpose" in life. Crowley's concept assumes that this includes the goal of attaining ] by one's own efforts, without the aid of God or other divine authority.<ref name=UD>Frater U.D. ''High Magic: Theory & Practice''. Llewellyn Worldwide, 2005. ISBN 0738704717</ref> Crowley was more specific about the True Will of women. He wrote that "women are nearly always conscious of an important part of their true Will; the bearing of children. To them nothing else is serious in comparison..."<ref>Crowley, Aleister. , I,52.</ref> (For more context on Crowley's apparent sexism, see ]).
Crowley said that in order to discover the True Will, one had to free the desires of the ] mind from the control of the conscious mind, especially the restrictions placed on sexual expression, which he associated with the power of divine creation.<ref>Sutin, p. 294.</ref> He taught that the True Will of each individual was identified with the ], a '']'' unique to each individual.<ref>Hymenaeus Beta (ed.) in Crowley, Aleister. ''The Goetia: The Lesser Key of Solomon the King'', p. xxi. Red Wheel, 1995. ISBN 087728847X</ref> Crowley believed that in order to discover the True Will, one had to free the desires of the ] mind from the control of the conscious mind, especially the restrictions placed on sexual expression, which he associated with the power of divine creation.<ref>Sutin, p. 294.</ref> He taught that the True Will of each individual was identified with the ], a '']'' unique to each individual.<ref>Hymenaeus Beta (ed.) in Crowley, Aleister. ''The Goetia: The Lesser Key of Solomon the King'', p. xxi. Red Wheel, 1995. ISBN 087728847X</ref>


{{See also|Thelemic mysticism}} {{See also|Thelemic mysticism}}
Line 124: Line 110:
], depicting Nuit, Hadit as the winged globe, Ra-Hoor-Khuit seated on his throne, and the creator of the Stèle, the scribe Ankh-af-na-khonsu]] ], depicting Nuit, Hadit as the winged globe, Ra-Hoor-Khuit seated on his throne, and the creator of the Stèle, the scribe Ankh-af-na-khonsu]]


Crowley's Thelema draws its principal gods and goddesses from ]. The highest deity in the cosmology of Thelema is in fact a goddess, '']''. She is the night sky arched over the Earth symbolized in the form of a naked woman. She is conceived as the ], the ultimate source of all things.<ref name=Orpheus>Orpheus, Rodney. ''Abrahadabra: Understanding Aleister Crowley's Thelemic Magick'', pp. 33-44. Weiser, 2005. ISBN 1578633265</ref> Thelema draws its principle gods and goddesses from ]. The highest deity in the cosmology of Thelema is in fact a goddess, '']''. She is the night sky arched over the Earth symbolized in the form of a naked woman. She is conceived as the ], the ultimate source of all things.<ref name=Orpheus>Orpheus, Rodney. ''Abrahadabra: Understanding Aleister Crowley's Thelemic Magick'', pp. 33-44. Weiser, 2005. ISBN 1578633265</ref>


The second principal deity of Thelema is the god '']'', conceived as the infinitely small complement and consort of Nuit. Hadit symbolizes manifestation, motion, and time.<ref name=Orpheus /> He is also described in ''Liber AL vel Legis'' as "the flame that burns in every heart of man, and in the core of every star."<ref>Crowley, Aleister. ''Liber AL vel Legis'', II,6.</ref> The second principle deity of Thelema is the god '']'', conceived as the infinitely small complement and consort of Nuit. Hadit symbolizes manifestation, motion, and time.<ref name=Orpheus /> He is also described in ''Liber AL vel Legis'' as "the flame that burns in every heart of man, and in the core of every star."<ref>Crowley, Aleister. ''Liber AL vel Legis'', II,6.</ref>


The third deity in the cosmology of Thelema is '']'', a manifestation of ]. He is symbolized as a throned man with the head of a ] who carries a wand. He is associated with the ] and the active energies of Thelemic ].<ref name=Orpheus /> The third deity in the cosmology of Thelema is '']'', a manifestation of ]. He is symbolized as a throned man with the head of a ] who carries a wand. He is associated with the ] and the active energies of Thelemic ].<ref name=Orpheus />


Other deities within the cosmology of Thelema are: Other deities within the cosmology of Thelema are:

*], the goddess of all pleasure, known as the Virgin Whore.<ref name=Orpheus />
*] (or ]), god of silence and inner strength, the brother of Ra-Hoor-Khuit.<ref name=Orpheus /> *] (or ]), god of silence and inner strength, the brother of Ra-Hoor-Khuit.<ref name=Orpheus />
*], the goddess of all pleasure, known as the Virgin Whore.<ref name=Orpheus />
*], the beast that Babalon rides, who represents the wild animal within man, a force of nature.<ref name=Orpheus /> *], the beast that Babalon rides, who represents the wild animal within man, a force of nature.<ref name=Orpheus />


===Magick=== ===Magick===
{{main|Magick}} {{main|Magick}}
The ''magick'' of Thelema is a system of discipline for physical, mental, and spiritual training.<ref>DuQuette, Lon Milo in Orpheus, Rodney. ''Abrahadabra'', p. 1</ref> Crowley defined magick as "the Science and Art of causing Change to occur in conformity with Will".<ref>Crowley, Aleister. ''Magick, Book 4'', Introduction to Part III</ref> He recommended magick as a means for discovering the ]<ref>Gardner, Gerald Brosseau. ''The Meaning of Witchcraft'', p. 86. Red Wheel, 2004. ISBN 1578633095</ref> and wrote about what the Law of Thelema says, for example, on the subject of working with the ].<ref name="astral" /><ref>"Concerning they Travellings in thy Body of Light, or Astral journeys and Visions so-called, do thou lay this Wisdom to thy Heart, o my Son, that in this Practice, whether Things Seen and Heard be Truth and Reality, or whether they be Phantoms in the Mind, abideth this Supreme Magical Value, namely: Whereas the Direction of such Journeys is consciously willed, and determined by Reason, and also unconsciously willed, by the true Self, since without It no Invocation were possible, we have here a Cooperation of Alliance between the Inner and the Outer Self, and thus an Accomplishment, at least partial, of the Great Work." Crowley, Aleister. in ''Liber Aleph Vel CXI: The Book of Wisdom or Folly'' (cap. 15). Weiser Books. ISBN 978-0877287292</ref> Crowley described the general process in ''Magick, Book 4:'' The ''magick'' of Thelema is a system of discipline for physical, mental, and spiritual training.<ref>DuQuette, Lon Milo in Orpheus, Rodney. ''Abrahadabra'', p. 1</ref> Crowley defined magick as "the Science and Art of causing Change to occur in conformity with Will".<ref>Crowley, Aleister. ''Magick, Book 4'', Introduction to Part III</ref> He recommended magick as a means for discovering the ]<ref>Gardner, Gerald Brosseau. ''The Meaning of Witchcraft'', p. 86. Red Wheel, 2004. ISBN 1578633095</ref> and wrote about what the Law of Thelema says about, for example, working with the ].<ref>"Concerning they Travellings in thy Body of Light, or Astral journeys and Visions so-called, do thou lay this Wisdom to thy Heart, o my Son, that in this Practice, whether Things Seen and Heard be Truth and Reality, or whether they be Phantoms in the Mind, abideth this Supreme Magical Value, namely: Whereas the Direction of such Journeys is consciously willed, and determined by Reason, and also unconsciously willed, by the true Self, since without It no Invocation were possible, we have here a Cooperation of Alliance between the Inner and the Outer Self, and thus an Accomplishment, at least partial, of the Great Work." Crowley, Aleister. in ''Liber Aleph Vel CXI: The Book of Wisdom or Folly'' (cap. 15). Weiser Books. ISBN 978-0877287292</ref> Crowley described the general process in ''Magick, Book 4:''


<blockquote>One must find out for oneself, and make sure beyond doubt, 'who' one is, 'what' one is, 'why' one is...Being thus conscious of the proper course to pursue, the next thing is to understand the conditions necessary to following it out. After that, one must eliminate from oneself every element alien or hostile to success, and develop those parts of oneself which are specially needed to control the aforesaid conditions.<ref>Crowley, Aleister. ''Magick, Book 4''</ref></blockquote> <blockquote>One must find out for oneself, and make sure beyond doubt, 'who' one is, 'what' one is, 'why' one is...Being thus conscious of the proper course to pursue, the next thing is to understand the conditions necessary to following it out. After that, one must eliminate from oneself every element alien or hostile to success, and develop those parts of oneself which are specially needed to control the aforesaid conditions.<ref>Crowley, Aleister. ''Magick, Book 4''</ref></blockquote>
Line 148: Line 135:
*Basic ] (] and ])<ref>Orpheus, pp. 9-16, 45-52</ref> *Basic ] (] and ])<ref>Orpheus, pp. 9-16, 45-52</ref>
*], for banishing and invocation (Golden Dawn)<ref name=DuQuette /> *], for banishing and invocation (Golden Dawn)<ref name=DuQuette />
*''Liber Resh'', consisting of four daily adorations to the sun<ref name=DuQuette />
*'']'', a ritual for the invocation of the ]<ref name=DuQuette /> *'']'', a ritual for the invocation of the ]<ref name=DuQuette />
* ''Liber Resh'', consisting of four daily adorations to the sun<ref name=DuQuette />
*Keeping a ]al ]<ref>Wasserman, James. ''Aleister Crowley and the Practice of the Magical Diary''. Weiser, 2006. ISBN 1578633729</ref>
*] in various forms including ], ], and ] practices<ref>Urban, Hugh. ''Magia Sexualis: Sex, Magic, and Liberation in Modern Western Esotericism''. University of California Press, 2006. ISBN 0520247760</ref> * Keeping a magical diary<ref>Wasserman, James. ''Aleister Crowley and the Practice of the Magical Diary''. Weiser, 2006. ISBN 1578633729</ref>
* ] in various forms including ], ], and ] practices<ref>Urban, Hugh. ''Magia Sexualis: Sex, Magic, and Liberation in Modern Western Esotericism''. University of California Press, 2006. ISBN 0520247760</ref>


===Ethics=== ===Ethics===
Thelema is an individual philosophy and does not have a concept of ethics in the usual sense.<ref name=Hessle>Hessle, Erwin. "The Ethics of Thelema" in '''', Vol. 1, No. 1 (Autumn 2007).</ref> Crowley wrote in the "New Comment" to ''Liber AL vel Legis'' (II,28) that: Thelema is a individual philosophy and does not have a concept of ethics in the usual sense.<ref name=Hessle>Hessle, Erwin. "The Ethics of Thelema" in '''', Vol. 1, No. 1 (Autumn 2007).</ref> Crowley wrote in the "New Comment" to ''Liber AL vel Legis'' (II,28) that:


<blockquote>There are no "standards of Right". Ethics is balderdash. Each Star must go on its own orbit. To hell with "moral principle"; there is no such thing.<ref>Crowley, Aleister. , II,28.</ref></blockquote> <blockquote>There are no "standards of Right". Ethics is balderdash. Each Star must go on its own orbit. To hell with "moral principle"; there is no such thing.<ref>Crowley, Aleister. , II,28.</ref></blockquote>


''Liber AL vel Legis'' does make clear some standards of individual conduct. The most primary of these is "Do what thou wilt" which is presented as the ''whole'' of the law, with no further law beyond it. It is also presented as a ''right''&mdash;the ''only'' right&mdash;and an ''indefeasible'' one.<ref name=Hessle /> Some interpreters of Thelema suppose that this right includes an obligation to allow others to do their own will or True Will without interference, but ''Liber AL'' includes no clear statement of this doctrine.<ref name=Hessle /> In practice Crowley did oppose interfering with the will of another person through sexual harassment, at least when it came to a Thelemic teacher forcing women to sleep with him: "What grosser violation of the Law of Thelema can one imagine?"<ref>Crowley, letter to Wilfred T. Smith, autumn 1943, O.T.O. archives, quoted and explained in Sutin p396-397.</ref> Earlier, during a series of affairs which he regarded in part as tests for his magical formula of Thelema or will,<ref>Sutin p252</ref> Crowley sought a child from one Ratan Devi but "still refused to interfere with her will".<ref>Confessions, Ch. 77.</ref> He passively allowed a journey which led to a miscarriage.<ref>Sutin p257</ref> ''Liber AL vel Legis'' does make clear some standards of individual conduct. The most primary of these is "Do what thou wilt" which is presented as the ''whole'' of the law, with no further law beyond it. It is also presented as a ''right''&mdash;the ''only'' right&mdash;and an ''indefeasible'' one.<ref name=Hessle /> Some interpreters of Thelema suppose that this right includes an obligation to allow others to do their own wills without interference, but such a concept is absent from ''Liber AL''.<ref name=Hessle />


Crowley wrote several additional documents presenting his personal views on individual conduct in light of the Law of Thelema, some of which do address the topic interference with others: ''Liber Oz'', ''Duty'', and ''Liber II''. Crowley wrote several additional documents presenting his personal views on individual conduct in light of the Law of Thelema, some of which do address the topic interference with others: ''Liber Oz'', ''Duty'', and ''Liber II''.


====''Liber Oz''==== ====''Liber Oz''====

''Liber Oz'' enumerates some of the rights of the individual implied by the one overarching right, "Do what thou wilt".<ref name=Hessle /> For each person, these include the right to: live by one's own law; live in the way that one wills to do; work, play, and rest as one will; die when and how one will; eat and drink what one will; live where one will; move about the earth as one will; think, speak, write, draw, paint, carve, etch, mould, build, and dress as one will; love when, where and with whom one will; and kill those who would thwart these rights.<ref>Crowley, Aleister. </ref> ''Liber Oz'' enumerates some of the rights of the individual implied by the one overarching right, "Do what thou wilt".<ref name=Hessle /> For each person, these include the right to: live by one's own law; live in the way that one wills to do; work, play, and rest as one will; die when and how one will; eat and drink what one will; live where one will; move about the earth as one will; think, speak, write, draw, paint, carve, etch, mould, build, and dress as one will; love when, where and with whom one will; and kill those who would thwart these rights.<ref>Crowley, Aleister. </ref>


====''Duty''==== ====''Duty''====

''Duty'' is described as "A note on the chief rules of practical conduct to be observed by those who accept the Law of Thelema."<ref name=Appendix1>Crowley, Aleister. ''Magick, Book 4'', Appendix I: "Official Instructions of the O.T.O", p. 484</ref> It is not a numbered "Liber" as are all the documents which Crowley intended for ], but rather listed as a document intended specifically for ].<ref name=Appendix1 /> There are four sections:<ref>Crowley, Aleister. .</ref> ''Duty'' is described as "A note on the chief rules of practical conduct to be observed by those who accept the Law of Thelema."<ref name=Appendix1>Crowley, Aleister. ''Magick, Book 4'', Appendix I: "Official Instructions of the O.T.O", p. 484</ref> It is not a numbered "Liber" as are all the documents which Crowley intended for ], but rather listed as a document intended specifically for ].<ref name=Appendix1 /> There are four sections:<ref>Crowley, Aleister. .</ref>

*'''A. Your Duty to Self:''' describes the self as the center of the universe, with a call to learn about one's inner nature. Admonishes to develop every faculty in a balanced way, establish one's autonomy, and to devote to the service of one's own ]. *'''A. Your Duty to Self:''' describes the self as the center of the universe, with a call to learn about one's inner nature. Admonishes to develop every faculty in a balanced way, establish one's autonomy, and to devote to the service of one's own ].
*'''B. Your Duty to Others:''' admonishes to eliminate the illusion of separateness between oneself and all others, to fight when necessary, to avoid interfering with the Wills of others, to enlighten others when needed, and to worship the divine nature of all other beings. *'''B. Your Duty to Others:''' admonishes to eliminate the illusion of separateness between oneself and all others, to fight when necessary, to avoid interfering with the Wills of others, to enlighten others when needed, and to worship the divine nature of all other beings.
Line 175: Line 165:
In ''Liber II: The Message of the Master Therion'', the Law of Thelema is summarized much more succinctly as ''"Do what thou wilt--then do nothing else"''.<ref>Crowley, Aleister. </ref> The author also describes the pursuit of Will as tireless activity without attachment to result, writing ''"The conception is, therefore, of an eternal motion, infinite and unalterable. It is ], only dynamic instead of static&mdash;and this comes to the same thing in the end."'' In ''Liber II: The Message of the Master Therion'', the Law of Thelema is summarized much more succinctly as ''"Do what thou wilt--then do nothing else"''.<ref>Crowley, Aleister. </ref> The author also describes the pursuit of Will as tireless activity without attachment to result, writing ''"The conception is, therefore, of an eternal motion, infinite and unalterable. It is ], only dynamic instead of static&mdash;and this comes to the same thing in the end."''


==Contemporary Thelema== == Contemporary Thelema==
] is one of the common symbols of modern Thelema]]

===Diversity of Thelemic thought=== ===Diversity of Thelemic thought===
The core of Thelemic thought is "Do what thou wilt." However, beyond this, there exists a very wide range of interpretation of Thelema. Modern Thelema is a syncretic philosophy and religion.<ref name=EMWNP>Rabinovitch, Shelley; Lewis, James. ''The Encyclopedia of Modern Witchcraft and Neo-Paganism'',, pp. 267&ndash;270. Citadel Press, 2004. ISBN 0806524065</ref> One of the more significant influences on Thelema has been Asian Buddhist and tantric traditions.<ref name=IAO131 /><ref name=EMWNP /><ref>]. . Retrieved ] ].</ref><ref>De Lupos, Rey. in , No. 1. Retrieved ] ].</ref> It also has elements of inverted and heretical Christianity (primarily ]) and is considered a ].<ref name=EMWNP /> (Note, however, that Crowley used this term in a different sense in his writings.)<ref>The Left Hand Path, Chapter XII of ''Magick Without Tears''. retrieved February 8, 2008.</ref> The core of Thelemic thought is "Do what thou wilt." However, beyond this, there exists a very wide range of interpretation of Thelema. Modern Thelema is a syncretic philosophy and religion.<ref name=EMWNP>Rabinovitch, Shelley; Lewis, James. ''The Encyclopedia of Modern Witchcraft and Neo-Paganism'',, pp. 267&ndash;270. Citadel Press, 2004. ISBN 0806524065</ref> One of the more significant influences on Thelema has been Asian Buddhist and tantric traditions.<ref name=IAO131 /><ref name=EMWNP /><ref>]. . Retrieved ] ].</ref><ref>De Lupos, Rey. in , No. 1. Retrieved ] ].</ref> It also has elements of inverted and heretical Christianity (primarily ]) and is considered a ].<ref name=EMWNP /> (Note, however, that Crowley used this term in a different sense in his writings.)<ref>The Left Hand Path, Chapter XII of ''Magick Without Tears''. retrieved February 8, 2008.</ref>
Line 185: Line 173:
<blockquote>I admit that my visions can never mean to other men as much as they do to me. I do not regret this. All I ask is that my results should convince seekers after truth that there is beyond doubt something worth while seeking, attainable by methods more or less like mine. I do not want to father a flock, to be the fetish of fools and fanatics, or the founder of a faith whose followers are content to echo my opinions. I want each man to cut his own way through the jungle.<ref>Crowley, Aleister. ''The Confessions of Aleister Crowley'', ch. 66</ref></blockquote> <blockquote>I admit that my visions can never mean to other men as much as they do to me. I do not regret this. All I ask is that my results should convince seekers after truth that there is beyond doubt something worth while seeking, attainable by methods more or less like mine. I do not want to father a flock, to be the fetish of fools and fanatics, or the founder of a faith whose followers are content to echo my opinions. I want each man to cut his own way through the jungle.<ref>Crowley, Aleister. ''The Confessions of Aleister Crowley'', ch. 66</ref></blockquote>


Thus, contemporary Thelemites may practice more than one religion, including ], ], ], ], ], and ].<ref name=EMWNP /> Many adherents of Thelema, none moreso than Crowley, recognize correlations between Thelemic and other systems of spiritual thought; most borrow freely from the methods and practices of other traditions, including ], ], ], ], ], and ].<ref name=EMWNP /> For example, ] and ] are thought to correspond with the ] and ] of ], ] and ] of the Hindu ]s, ] and ] of ], ] and ] in the Qabalah.<ref>Orpheus, p. 124 (Qabalah) and p. 131 (on ''Liber 777'').</ref><ref>Jonathan Bethel & Michael McDaniel, , retrieved March 23, 2009.</ref><ref>Crowley, Aleister. "777 Revised" in ''The Qabalah of Aleister Crowley''. New York: Samuel Weiser, 1973. ISBN 0-87728-222-6</ref> Thus, contemporary Thelemites may practice more than one religion, including ], ], ], ], ], and ].<ref name=EMWNP /> Many adherents of Thelema, none moreso than Crowley, recognize correlations between Thelemic and other systems of spiritual thought; most borrow freely from the methods and practices of other traditions, including ], ], ], ], ], and ].<ref name=EMWNP /> For example, ] and ] are thought to correspond with the ] and ] of ], ] and ] of the Hindu ]s, ] and ] of ], ] and ] in the Qabalah.<ref>Crowley, Aleister. "777 Revised" in ''The Qabalah of Aleister Crowley''. New York: Samuel Weiser, 1973. ISBN 0-87728-222-6</ref>


Some organizations purport to stay true to Crowley's system, such as the ] and ], the second of which serves as the focus for more controversy than even the average occult organization.<ref name="evil" /> In one of the more recent disputes, the current National Grand Master General of the U.S. O.T.O. Grand Lodge dismissed "Rabelaisian Thelema" as a "meaningless diversion", saying "Saint Rabelais never intended his satirical, fictional device to serve as a practical blueprint for a real human society".<ref>National Grand Master General Sabazius X°. , August 10, 2007</ref> This opinion met with quick disagreement.<ref name="Miller" /> Some organizations purport to stay true to Crowley's system, such as the ] and ], though the current National Grand Master General of the U.S. O.T.O. Grand Lodge dismisses Rabelais as "some meaningless diversion",<ref>National Grand Master General Sabazius X°. , August 10, 2007</ref> an opinion which was quickly rebutted.<ref>Miller, Jason. in ''Silver Star: A Journal of New Magick'', Issue 8, Fall Equinox, 2007, p. 32</ref>


Other organizations and persons who consider themselves Thelemites regard Crowley's system to be only one possible manifestation of Thelema, creating original systems, such as those of ] (see below), ], and ].<ref>Evans, Dave. ''The History of British Magick After Crowley'', pp. 229-284. Hidden Publishing. ISBN 978-0-9555237-0-0</ref> Some of these accept ''The Book of the Law'' in some way, but not the rest of Crowley's "inspired" writings or teachings. Others take only specific aspects of his overall system, such as his magical techniques, ethics, mysticism, or religious ideas, while ignoring the rest. Other organizations and persons who consider themselves Thelemites regard Crowley's system to be only one possible manifestation of Thelema, creating original systems, such as those of ] (see below), ], and ].<ref>Evans, Dave. ''The History of British Magick After Crowley'', pp. 229-284. Hidden Publishing. ISBN 978-0-9555237-0-0</ref> Some of these accept ''The Book of the Law'' in some way, but not the rest of Crowley's "inspired" writings or teachings. Others take only specific aspects of his overall system, such as his magical techniques, ethics, mysticism, or religious ideas, while ignoring the rest.
Line 197: Line 185:
One can also find Thelemites in other organizations. The president of the ], ], identifies as a Thelemite and sex magician. A significant minority of other CAW members also identify as Thelemites.<ref name=EMWNP /> One can also find Thelemites in other organizations. The president of the ], ], identifies as a Thelemite and sex magician. A significant minority of other CAW members also identify as Thelemites.<ref name=EMWNP />


===Contemporary literature=== ===Contemporary Thelemic literature===
{{Unreferenced section|date=June 2008}}


By far, the bulk of writing on the topic of Thelema remains that of Aleister Crowley. He was highly prolific and wrote on the subject of Thelema for over 35 years, and many of his books remain in print. During his time, there were a few who wrote on the subject, including ] and ]. Since his death in 1947 only a few writers' accounts of Thelema have appeared in published books. Perhaps the four most published writers have been: By far, the bulk of Thelemic writing remains that of Aleister Crowley. He was highly prolific and wrote on the subject of Thelema for over 35 years, and many of his books remain in print. During his time, there were a few who wrote on the subject, including ] and ]. Since his death in 1947 only a few Thelemic voices have appeared in published books. Perhaps the four most published voices have been:
*], who not only edited many of Crowley's works, but wrote a biography of him &mdash; ''The Eye in the Triangle'' &mdash; and penned many books on the teachings of the ], such as '']'', '']'', ''The Tree of Life'', and '']''. *], who not only edited many of Crowley's works, but wrote a biography of him—''The Eye in the Triangle''—and penned many books on ritual and ], such as ''Garden of Pomegranates'', ''Golden Dawn'', ''Middle Pillar'', and ''Tree of Life''.
*], who has written many books on Thelema and the occult, such as ''The Magical Revival'', ''Aleister Crowley and the Hidden God'', ''Outside the Circles of Time,'' and ''Hecate's Fountain''. *], who has written many books on Thelema and the occult, such as ''The Magical Revival, Aleister Crowley and the Hidden God, Outside the Circles of Time,'' and ''Hecate's Fountain''.
*], a popular author whose books are mostly dedicated to analyzing and exploring Crowley's system, including such books as ''Understanding Aleister Crowley's Thoth Tarot'', ''The Chicken Qabalah of Rabbi Lamed Ben Clifford'', ''The Magick of Aleister Crowley'', and ''The Key to Solomon's Key''. *], a popular author whose books are mostly dedicated to analyzing and exploring Crowley's system, including such books as ''Understanding Aleister Crowley's Thoth Tarot, The Chicken Qabalah of Rabbi Lamed Ben Clifford, The Magick of Aleister Crowley,'' and ''The Key to Solomon's Key''.
*], whose '']'' announces and explains the ]ian current has influenced Thelemites for over 25 years. She now has several books on Ma'atian Thelema including her book, '']''. *], whose '']'' announces and explains the ]ian current has influenced Thelemites for over 25 years. She now has several books on Ma'atian Thelema including her book, '']''.


Line 211: Line 198:


===Thelemic organizations=== ===Thelemic organizations===
The two most prominent modern organizations were headed by Crowley during his lifetime, the ]—a teaching order designed to guide initiates through Crowley's ] of Thelema—and ]—a fraternal order that initially developed from the ] of ] (which is considered ] by most Masonic Grand Lodges and Grand Orients) and includes ] (which celebrates the ]). Several modern organizations of various sizes claim to follow the tenets of Thelema. The two most prominent are both organizations that Crowley headed during his lifetime, the ]—a teaching order designed to guide initiates through Crowley's ] of Thelema—and ]—a fraternal order that initially developed from the ] of ] (which is considered ] by most Masonic Grand Lodges and Grand Orients) and includes ] (which celebrates the ]).


Since Crowley's death in 1947, other organizations have formed to carry on his initial work &mdash; for example, ]'s ], the ] of ], Society O.T.O. of ], the ], OTO Foundation, the Horus-Maat Lodge, the Thelemic Order of the Golden Dawn, the Holy Order Of Ra-Hoor-Khuit, ], The Order of Thelemic Knights, and Ecclesia Gnostica Universalis. Since Crowley's death in 1947, other organizations have formed to carry on his initial work—for example, ]'s ], the ] of ], Society O.T.O. of ], OTO Foundation, Thelemic Order of the Golden Dawn, the Holy Order Of Ra-Hoor-Khuit, ], and The Order of Thelemic Knights. Other groups of widely varying character exist which have drawn inspiration or methods from Thelema, such as the ] and the ]. Groups such as ], Horus-Maat Lodge, The Hawk and Jackal Covens, and The Thelema Society accept the Law of Thelema, but omit certain aspects of Crowley's system while incorporating the works of other mystics, philosophers, and religious systems.

Other groups of widely varying character exist which have drawn inspiration or methods from Thelema, such as the ] and the ]. Groups such as ], the Hawk and Jackal Covens, and the Thelema Society accept the Law of Thelema, but omit certain aspects of Crowley's system while incorporating the works of other mystics, philosophers, and religious systems.{{Facts|date=June 2008}}


==Thelema in comparative religion== ==Thelema in comparative religion==
Bishop of the ] of Wiesbaden Federico Tolli, in his German book ''Thelema &mdash; Im Spannungsfeld zwischen Christentum, Logentradition und New Aeon'', presented Thelema as the dialectical consequence of Christianity. Christianity for Tolli exists as a community in ], whereas Tolli sees Thelema as a necessarily individualistic response to the world.<ref name=Tolli>Tolli, Federico. ''Thelema — Im Spannungsfeld zwischen Christentum, Logentradition und New Aeon''. Leipzig, 2004.</ref>


Thelema has been attracting more attention in recent years from scholars of religion, especially those interested in ]s, contemporary Gnosticisms and Hermeticisms. References at the end of this article supply a few such sources. Perhaps the most unusual attempt was made by bishop Federico Tolli, in his German book ''Thelema &mdash; Im Spannungsfeld zwischen Christentum, Logentradition und New Aeon''<ref>Tolli, Federico. ''Thelema — Im Spannungsfeld zwischen Christentum, Logentradition und New Aeon''. Leipzig, 2004.</ref> For Tolli, Thelema is to be regarded as the dialectical consequence of Christianity. Christianity for Tolli exists as a community in ], whereas Tolli sees Thelema as a necessarily individualistic response to the world.
Tolli discusses Thelema in the context of 'salvation history' ''(Heilsgeschichte)''. Tolli regards Crowley's ''Heilsgeschichte'' as one in which the whole Universe (therefore the Will of God) is to combine (analogous to the Alchemical formula 'coagula'). "Love", in the form of combinatory attraction ("Love is the law, love under will"), is a universal principle &mdash; therefore akin to the concept of ]. The main difference (for Tolli) is that in Christianity salvation of the entire Universe ("Ganzheit") cannot be made by 'solipsistic' man. Tolli sees Crowley as a failed &mdash; however talented &mdash; artist or "Mystagogie", but not as a "]".<ref name=Tolli />

Taken from a 1938 theological dictionary (to the ]), the concept of 'salvation history' ''(Heilsgeschichte)'' has a great effect on Tolli's thought, and it is in this context that he discusses Crowleyan Thelema. Tolli regards Crowley's ''Heilsgeschichte'' as one in which the whole Universe (ergo the Will of God) is to combine (analogous to the Alchemical formula 'coagula'). "Love", in the form of combinatory attraction ("Love is the law, love under will"), is a universal principle &mdash; therefore akin to the concept of ]. The main difference (for Tolli) is that in Christianity salvation of the entire Universe ("Ganzheit") cannot be made by 'solipsistic' man. The bishop sees Crowley as a failed &ndash; however talented &ndash; artist or "Mystagogie", but not as a "]". The merit and contribution of bishop Tolli to Thelemic studies lies in the fact that it was he who first expresses that the genuine meaning and idea of Thelema does not necessarily contradict the teachings of ], as Crowley himself affirms.


== See also == == See also ==
<!-- Please note that in general, articles already linked earlier in the article do not also get listed in the see also section. --> <!-- Please note that in general, articles already linked earlier in the article do not also get listed in the see also section. -->
{{multicol}}
*] *]
*]
*] *]
*] *]
{{multicol-end}}


==Notes== ==Notes==
Line 241: Line 226:
*Adams, Ron. in '']'', Vol. 3, No. 4, Spring Equinox 2004, pp. 71-78 *Adams, Ron. in '']'', Vol. 3, No. 4, Spring Equinox 2004, pp. 71-78
*Alamantra, Frater. in '']'', Vol. 3, No. 4, Spring Equinox 2004, pp. 39-59 *Alamantra, Frater. in '']'', Vol. 3, No. 4, Spring Equinox 2004, pp. 39-59
*] (1946). ''Mimesis: The Representation of Reality in Western Literature'' (50th Aniv. Edition). Princeton University Press, 2003. ISBN 978-0691113364 *Aeurbach, Erich (1946). ''Mimesis: The Representation of Reality in Western Literature'' (50th Aniv. Edition). Princeton University Press, 2003. ISBN 978-0691113364
*Coppens, Philip (2006). ''''. Retrieved July 21, 2006. *Coppens, Philip (2006). ''''. Retrieved July 21, 2006.
*Crowley, Aleister. ''The Book of the Law / Liber AL vel Legis''. Weiser Books, 2004. ISBN 978-1578633081 *Crowley, Aleister. ''The Book of the Law / Liber AL vel Legis''. Weiser Books, 2004. ISBN 978-1578633081
Line 258: Line 243:
*Pearson, Joanne. ''A Popular Dictionary of Paganism'', p. 44. Routledge, 2002. ISBN 0700715916 *Pearson, Joanne. ''A Popular Dictionary of Paganism'', p. 44. Routledge, 2002. ISBN 0700715916
*Pocetto, Alexander T. , retrieved July 20, 2006. *Pocetto, Alexander T. , retrieved July 20, 2006.
*]. ''Gargantua and Pantagruel''. Everyman's Library. ISBN 978-0679431374 *Rabelais, François. ''Gargantua and Pantagruel''. Everyman's Library. ISBN 978-0679431374
*Rabinovitch, Shelley; Lewis, James. ''The Encyclopedia of Modern Witchcraft and Neo-Paganism''. Citadel Press, 2004. ISBN 0806524065 *Rabinovitch, Shelley; Lewis, James. ''The Encyclopedia of Modern Witchcraft and Neo-Paganism''. Citadel Press, 2004. ISBN 0806524065
*Rubin, David Lee; Stroup, Alice (1999). ''Utopia 2: The Eighteenth Century''. Rockwood Press. ISBN 1886365105 *Rubin, David Lee; Stroup, Alice (1999). ''Utopia 2: The Eighteenth Century''. Rockwood Press. ISBN 1886365105
Line 270: Line 255:
*Willens, Daniel. in '']'', summer 1992. Retrieved July 22, 2006 *Willens, Daniel. in '']'', summer 1992. Retrieved July 22, 2006
*Wilson, Robert Anton. ''The Illuminati Papers''. Ronin Publishing, 1997. ISBN 1579510027 *Wilson, Robert Anton. ''The Illuminati Papers''. Ronin Publishing, 1997. ISBN 1579510027
*{{1911}} * {{1911}}


==Further reading== ==Further reading==
*Frater Choronzon, * Frater Choronzon,
*Del Campo, Gerald. ''''. The Order of Thelemic Knights. *Del Campo, Gerald. ''''. The Order of Thelemic Knights.
*Melton, J. Gordon (1983). "Thelemic Magick in America." ''Alternatives to American Mainline Churches'', ed. Joseph H. Fichter. Barrytown, NY: Unification Theological Seminary. *Melton, J. Gordon (1983). "Thelemic Magick in America." ''Alternatives to American Mainline Churches'', ed. Joseph H. Fichter. Barrytown, NY: Unification Theological Seminary.
*Starr, Martin P. (2004) A Hundred Years Hence: Visions of a Thelemic Future (Conference Paper presented at the Thelema Beyond Crowley ) * Starr, Martin P. (2004) A Hundred Years Hence: Visions of a Thelemic Future (Conference Paper presented at the Thelema Beyond Crowley )
*Starr, Martin P. (2003). ''The Unknown God: W.T. Smith and the Thelemites.'' Bolingbrook, IL: Teitan Press. *Starr, Martin P. (2003). ''The Unknown God: W.T. Smith and the Thelemites.'' Bolingbrook, IL: Teitan Press.
*van Egmond, Daniel (1998). "Western Esoteric Schools in the Late Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Centuries." in van den Broek, Roelof and Hanegraaff, Wouter J. ''Gnosis and Hermeticism From Antiquity To Modern Times.'' Albany: State University of New York Press. * van Egmond, Daniel (1998). "Western Esoteric Schools in the Late Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Centuries." in van den Broek, Roelof and Hanegraaff, Wouter J. ''Gnosis and Hermeticism From Antiquity To Modern Times.'' Albany: State University of New York Press.
*Voxfire, Thomas (2004). "Something from Nothing: the Essence of Creation" in . Retrieved ] ]. * Voxfire, Thomas (2004). "Something from Nothing: the Essence of Creation" in . Retrieved ] ].


==External links== ==External links==
* &mdash; a collection of texts on the topic of Thelema
{{Wikiversity|Topic:Thelema}}
* &mdash; by Alexander Duncan
* &mdash; by John Bowie
* &mdash; Special Thelema Centennial Edition * &mdash; Special Thelema Centennial Edition
* &mdash; by John Bowie
* &mdash; by Alexander Duncan
* &mdash; a collection of texts on the topic of Thelema
*{{dmoz|Society/Religion_and_Spirituality/Esoteric_and_Occult/Thelema}} *{{dmoz|Society/Religion_and_Spirituality/Esoteric_and_Occult/Thelema}}

===Reference sites===
* - a project of
*


===Thelemic journals=== ===Thelemic journals===
*'''' *''''
*''''
*'''' *''''
*''''
*'''' *''''


===Podcasts=== === Podcasts ===
*''''
*'''' *''''


Line 315: Line 294:
] ]
] ]
]
]
] ]
]
] ]
] ]
Line 325: Line 301:
] ]
] ]
]
]

Revision as of 03:43, 1 April 2009

Thelema is a philosophy of life based on the rule or law, "Do what thou wilt." The ideal of "Do what thou wilt" and its association with the word Thelema goes back to François Rabelais, but was more fully developed and proselytized by Aleister Crowley,who founded a religion named Thelema based on this ideal. The word itself is the English transliteration of the Koine Greek noun θέλημα: "will", from the verb θέλω: to will, wish, purpose. Early Christian writings use the word to refer to the will of God, the human will, and even the will of God's opponent, the Devil.

In the 16th century, François Rabelais used Thélème, the French form of the word, as the name of a fictional Abbey in his famous books, Gargantua and Pantagruel. The only rule of this Abbey was "fay çe que vouldras" ("Fais ce que tu veux," or, "Do what thou wilt"). This rule was revived and used in the real world in the mid 18th century by Sir Francis Dashwood, who inscribed it on a doorway of his abbey at Medmenham, where it served as the motto of The Hellfire Club.

The same rule was used in 1904 by Aleister Crowley in The Book of the Law. This book contains both the phrase "Do what thou wilt" and the word Thelema in Greek, which Crowley took for the name of the philosophical, mystical and religious system which he subsequently developed. This system includes ideas from occultism, Yoga, and both Eastern and Western mysticism (especially the Qabalah).

Shri Gurudev Mahendranath, in speaking of svecchachara, the Sanskrit equivalent of the phrase "Do what thou wilt", wrote that "Rabelais, Dashwood, and Crowley must share the honor of perpetuating what has been such a high ideal in most of Asia."

The Unicursal Hexagram is one of the common symbols of Thelema

Historical background

The word θέλημα (thelema) is of some consequence in the original Greek Christian scriptures, referring to divine and human will. One well-known example is from “The Lord’s Prayer” in Matthew 6:10, “Your kingdom come. Your will (Θελημα) be done, On earth as it is in heaven.” Some other quotes from the Bible are:

He went away again a second time and prayed, saying, "My Father, if this cannot pass away unless I drink it, Your will be done." —Matthew 26:42

But as many as received Him, to them He gave the right to become children of God, even to those who believe in His name, who were born, not of blood nor of the will of the flesh nor of the will of man, but of God. —John 1:12–13

And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, so that you may prove what the will of God is, that which is good and acceptable and perfect. —Romans 12:2

…and they may come to their senses and escape from the snare of the devil, having been held captive by him to do his will. —2 Timothy 2:26

Worthy are You, our Lord and our God, to receive glory and honor and power; for You created all things, and because of Your will they existed, and were created. —Revelation 4:11

In the 5th century, Augustine of Hippo wrote "Love, and do what you will" (Dilige et quod vis fac) in his Sermon on 1 John 7, 8.

In the Renaissance, a character named "Thelemia" represents will or desire in the Hypnerotomachia Poliphili of the Dominican monk Francesco Colonna. Colonna's work was, in turn, a great influence on the Franciscan monk Francois Rabelais, whose Gargantua and Pantagruel includes an Abbey of Thélème.

Rabelais' Thélème

François Rabelais

François Rabelais was a Franciscan and later a Benedictine monk of the 16th century. Eventually he left the monastery to study medicine, and so moved to Lyon in 1532. It was there that he wrote Gargantua and Pantagruel, a connected series of books. They tell the story of two giants—a father (Gargantua) and his son (Pantagruel) and their adventures—written in an amusing, extravagant, and satirical vein.

It is in the first book (ch. 52-57) where Rabelais writes of the Abbey of Thélème, built by the giant Gargantua. It pokes fun at the monastic institutions, since his abbey has a swimming pool, maid service, and no clocks in sight.

One of the verses of the inscription on the gate to Thélème says:

Grace, honour, praise, delight,
Here sojourn day and night.
   Sound bodies lined
   With a good mind,
Do here pursue with might
Grace, honour, praise, delight.

But below the humour was a very real concept of utopia and the ideal society. Rabelais gives us a description of how the Thelemites of the Abbey lived and the rules they lived by:

All their life was spent not in laws, statutes, or rules, but according to their own free will and pleasure. They rose out of their beds when they thought good; they did eat, drink, labour, sleep, when they had a mind to it and were disposed for it. None did awake them, none did offer to constrain them to eat, drink, nor to do any other thing; for so had Gargantua established it. In all their rule and strictest tie of their order there was but this one clause to be observed,

Do What Thou Wilt;

because men that are free, well-born, well-bred, and conversant in honest companies, have naturally an instinct and spur that prompteth them unto virtuous actions, and withdraws them from vice, which is called honour. Those same men, when by base subjection and constraint they are brought under and kept down, turn aside from that noble disposition by which they formerly were inclined to virtue, to shake off and break that bond of servitude wherein they are so tyrannously enslaved; for it is agreeable with the nature of man to long after things forbidden and to desire what is denied us.

Some scholars argue that Martin Luther influenced Rabelais, and that the French author wrote from a specifically Christian perspective. In particular, Alexander Pocetto of the Allentown College of St. Francis de Sales draws many parallels between Rabelais and Francis de Sales. Erich Auerbach disagrees, writing that the revolutionary thing about Rabelais' way of thinking "is not his opposition to Christianity, but the freedom of vision, feeling and thought which his perpetual playing with things produces, and which invites the reader to deal directly with the world and its wealth of phenomena. On one point, to be sure, Rabelais takes a stand, and it is a stand which is basically anti-Christian; for him, the man who follows his nature is good, and natural life, be it of men or things, is good..."

Francis Dashwood and the Hellfire Club

Sir Francis Dashwood adopted some of the ideas of Rabelais and invoked the same rule in French when he founded a group called the Monks of Medmenham (better known as The Hellfire Club). An abbey was established at Medmenham, described in the 1911 Britannica as follows:

At Medmenham, on the Thames above Marlow, there are fragments, incorporated into a residence, of a Cistercian abbey founded in 1201; which became notorious in the middle of the 18th century as the meeting-place of a convivial club called the Franciscans after its founder, Sir Francis Dashwood, afterwards Lord le Despencer (1708-1781), and also known as the Hell-Fire Club, of which John Wilkes, Bubb Dodington and other political notorieties were members. The motto of the club, fay Ce que voudras (do what you will), inscribed on a doorway at the abbey, was borrowed from Rabelais description of the abbey of Thelema in Gargantua.

We have little direct evidence of what Dashwood's Hellfire Club did or believed. The one direct testimonial comes from John Wilkes, a member who never got into the chapter-room of the inner circle. He describes their origin as follows:

A set of worthy, jolly fellows, happy disciples of Venus and Bacchus, got occasionally together to celebrate woman in wine and to give more zest to the festive meeting, they plucked every luxurious idea from the ancients and enriched their own modern pleasures with the tradition of classic luxury.

The group derived more from Rabelais than the inscription over the door, in the opinion of Lt.-Col. Towers, who wrote "My interpretation of the caves remains as stated, that they were used as a Dionysian oracular temple, based upon Dashwood’s reading of the relevant chapters of Rabelais."

Sir Nathaniel Wraxall in his Historical Memoires (1815) accused the Monks of performing Satanic rituals, but these claims have been dismissed as hearsay. Gerald Gardner and others such as Mike Howard say the Monks worshipped "the Goddess." Daniel Willens argued that the group likely practiced Freemasonry, but also suggests Dashwood may have held secret Roman Catholic sacraments. He asks if Wilkes would have recognized a genuine Catholic Mass, even if he saw it himself and even if the underground version followed its public model precisely. The Grand Lodge of British Columbia and Yukon minimizes the connection with Freemasonry.

Subsequent historical references

Later, Sir Walter Besant and James Rice referred to Rabelais' Abbey of Thelema in their novel The Monks of Thelema (1878), as did C.R. Ashbee in his utopian romance The Building of Thelema (1910).

People living between Rabelais and Crowley sometimes used the word "Thelemites" to mean people who do as they please. Sometimes they even used the term positively, but did so with some degree of secrecy and deniability.

Aleister Crowley's work

Part of a series on
Thelema
Crowley's unicursal hexagramUnicursal hexagram
The Rights of Man
Holy Books and Stele
Key figures
The Scarlet Women
Core concepts
Methods
Thelemic texts
Organizations
Deities
Places
Related topics

Aleister Crowley (1875–1947) was an English occultist, writer, and social provocateur. Rabelais was one of Crowley's heroes and his books Gargantua and Pantagruel may have provided Crowley with part of the philosophic basis for the Law of Thelema, namely the phrase "Do what thou wilt". In The Antecedents of Thelema, Crowley referred to Rabelais as "Our Master", and Rabelais was also included among the Saints of Ecclesia Gnostica Catholica along with Virgil, Catullus and Swinburne.

In 1904, Crowley claimed to have received Liber AL vel Legis, the Book of the Law from an entity named Aiwass, which was to serve as the foundation of the religious and philosophical system he called Thelema. Crowley summed up his Law of Thelema in these phrases from the Book:

  • "Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law"
  • "Love is the law, love under will"
  • "There is no Law beyond Do what thou wilt"

Shri Gurudev Mahendranath and others have written that Crowley revived the Thelemic Law from Rabelais. Aleister Crowley wrote in The Antecedents of Thelema (1926) that Rabelais "set forth in essence the Law of Thelema, very much as it is understood by the Master Therion himself," and further that "the masterpiece of Rabelais contains in singular perfection a clear forecast of the Book which was to be revealed by Aiwass to Ankh-f-n-khonsu 370 years later." But Crowley biographer Lawrence Sutin disagrees, writing that in his opinion,

Questions of prophecy aside, Rabelais was no precursor of Thelema. Joyous and unsystematic, Rabelais blended in his heterodox creed elements of Stoic self-mastery and spontaneous Christian faith and kindness.

The Book of the Law

Aleister Crowley, scribe of Liber Legis
Main article: The Book of the Law

Crowley's system of Thelema begins with The Book of the Law, which bears the official name Liber AL vel Legis. It was written in Cairo, Egypt during his honeymoon with his new wife Rose Crowley (née Kelly). This small book contains three chapters, each of which he wrote in one hour, beginning at noon, on April 8, April 9, and April 10, 1904. Crowley claims that he took dictation from an entity named Aiwass, whom he later identified as his own Holy Guardian Angel. However, an analysis by Dan Evans shows similarities not only with Rabelais, but also to The Beloved of Hathor and Shrine of the Golden Hawk, a play by Florence Farr.

Crowley wrote several commentaries on The Book of the Law, the last of which he wrote in 1925. This brief statement called simply "The Comment" warns against the study of the Book and discussing its contents, and states that all "questions of the Law are to be decided only by appeal to my writings" and is signed Ankh-af-na-khonsu. The only known writings of Ankh-af-na-khonsu appear on the Stèle of Revealing.

True Will

Main article: True Will

According to Crowley, every individual has a True Will, to be distinguished from the ordinary wants and desires of the ego. The True Will is essentially one's "calling" or "purpose" in life. Crowley's concept assumes that this includes the goal of attaining self-realization by one's own efforts, without the aid of God or other divine authority. Crowley was more specific about the True Will of women. He wrote that "women are nearly always conscious of an important part of their true Will; the bearing of children. To them nothing else is serious in comparison..." (For more context on Crowley's apparent sexism, see Aleister Crowley#Sexism).

Crowley believed that in order to discover the True Will, one had to free the desires of the subconscious mind from the control of the conscious mind, especially the restrictions placed on sexual expression, which he associated with the power of divine creation. He taught that the True Will of each individual was identified with the Holy Guardian Angel, a daimon unique to each individual.

See also: Thelemic mysticism

Skepticism

Crowley taught skeptical examination of all results obtained through meditation or magick, at least for the student. He tied this to the necessity of keeping a magical record that attempts to list all conditions of the event (see practices and observances, below). In Liber ABA (Magick, Book 4) Part 1 (written 1912-1913), Crowley makes this optimistic remark while drawing similarities between various influential religious teachers:

Diverse as these statements are at first sight, all agree in announcing an experience of the class which fifty years ago would have been called supernatural, to-day may be called spiritual, and fifty years hence will have a proper name based on an understanding of the phenomenon which occurred.

Cosmology

File:Stele of revealing.jpg
The Stèle of Revealing, depicting Nuit, Hadit as the winged globe, Ra-Hoor-Khuit seated on his throne, and the creator of the Stèle, the scribe Ankh-af-na-khonsu

Thelema draws its principle gods and goddesses from Ancient Egyptian religion. The highest deity in the cosmology of Thelema is in fact a goddess, Nuit. She is the night sky arched over the Earth symbolized in the form of a naked woman. She is conceived as the Great Mother, the ultimate source of all things.

The second principle deity of Thelema is the god Hadit, conceived as the infinitely small complement and consort of Nuit. Hadit symbolizes manifestation, motion, and time. He is also described in Liber AL vel Legis as "the flame that burns in every heart of man, and in the core of every star."

The third deity in the cosmology of Thelema is Ra-Hoor-Khuit, a manifestation of Horus. He is symbolized as a throned man with the head of a hawk who carries a wand. He is associated with the Sun and the active energies of Thelemic magick.

Other deities within the cosmology of Thelema are:

  • Hoor-paar-kraat (or Harpocrates), god of silence and inner strength, the brother of Ra-Hoor-Khuit.
  • Babalon, the goddess of all pleasure, known as the Virgin Whore.
  • Therion, the beast that Babalon rides, who represents the wild animal within man, a force of nature.

Magick

Main article: Magick

The magick of Thelema is a system of discipline for physical, mental, and spiritual training. Crowley defined magick as "the Science and Art of causing Change to occur in conformity with Will". He recommended magick as a means for discovering the True Will and wrote about what the Law of Thelema says about, for example, working with the astral plane. Crowley described the general process in Magick, Book 4:

One must find out for oneself, and make sure beyond doubt, 'who' one is, 'what' one is, 'why' one is...Being thus conscious of the proper course to pursue, the next thing is to understand the conditions necessary to following it out. After that, one must eliminate from oneself every element alien or hostile to success, and develop those parts of oneself which are specially needed to control the aforesaid conditions.

Practices and observances

The practice of magick in Thelema is largely an individual affair. Generally, practices are designed to assist in finding and manifesting the True Will, although some include celebratory aspects as well.

Crowley integrated Eastern practices with Western magical practices from the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn. He recommended a number of these practices to his followers, including:

Ethics

Thelema is a individual philosophy and does not have a concept of ethics in the usual sense. Crowley wrote in the "New Comment" to Liber AL vel Legis (II,28) that:

There are no "standards of Right". Ethics is balderdash. Each Star must go on its own orbit. To hell with "moral principle"; there is no such thing.

Liber AL vel Legis does make clear some standards of individual conduct. The most primary of these is "Do what thou wilt" which is presented as the whole of the law, with no further law beyond it. It is also presented as a right—the only right—and an indefeasible one. Some interpreters of Thelema suppose that this right includes an obligation to allow others to do their own wills without interference, but such a concept is absent from Liber AL.

Crowley wrote several additional documents presenting his personal views on individual conduct in light of the Law of Thelema, some of which do address the topic interference with others: Liber Oz, Duty, and Liber II.

Liber Oz

Liber Oz enumerates some of the rights of the individual implied by the one overarching right, "Do what thou wilt". For each person, these include the right to: live by one's own law; live in the way that one wills to do; work, play, and rest as one will; die when and how one will; eat and drink what one will; live where one will; move about the earth as one will; think, speak, write, draw, paint, carve, etch, mould, build, and dress as one will; love when, where and with whom one will; and kill those who would thwart these rights.

Duty

Duty is described as "A note on the chief rules of practical conduct to be observed by those who accept the Law of Thelema." It is not a numbered "Liber" as are all the documents which Crowley intended for A.'.A.'., but rather listed as a document intended specifically for Ordo Templi Orientis. There are four sections:

  • A. Your Duty to Self: describes the self as the center of the universe, with a call to learn about one's inner nature. Admonishes to develop every faculty in a balanced way, establish one's autonomy, and to devote to the service of one's own True Will.
  • B. Your Duty to Others: admonishes to eliminate the illusion of separateness between oneself and all others, to fight when necessary, to avoid interfering with the Wills of others, to enlighten others when needed, and to worship the divine nature of all other beings.
  • C. Your Duty to Mankind: admonishes that the Law of Thelema should be the sole basis of conduct. That the laws of the land should have the aim of securing the greatest liberty for all individuals. Crime is described as being a violation of one's True Will.
  • D. Your Duty to All Other Beings and Things: admonishes the application of the Law of Thelema to all problems and states that "It is a violation of the Law of Thelema to abuse the natural qualities of any animal or object by diverting it from its proper function" and "The Law of Thelema is to be applied unflinchingly to decide every question of conduct."

Liber II

In Liber II: The Message of the Master Therion, the Law of Thelema is summarized much more succinctly as "Do what thou wilt--then do nothing else". The author also describes the pursuit of Will as tireless activity without attachment to result, writing "The conception is, therefore, of an eternal motion, infinite and unalterable. It is Nirvana, only dynamic instead of static—and this comes to the same thing in the end."

Contemporary Thelema

Diversity of Thelemic thought

The core of Thelemic thought is "Do what thou wilt." However, beyond this, there exists a very wide range of interpretation of Thelema. Modern Thelema is a syncretic philosophy and religion. One of the more significant influences on Thelema has been Asian Buddhist and tantric traditions. It also has elements of inverted and heretical Christianity (primarily Gnosticism) and is considered a Left-Hand Path. (Note, however, that Crowley used this term in a different sense in his writings.)

Many Thelemites avoid strongly dogmatic or fundamentalist thinking. Crowley himself put strong emphasis on the unique nature of Will inherent in each individual:

I admit that my visions can never mean to other men as much as they do to me. I do not regret this. All I ask is that my results should convince seekers after truth that there is beyond doubt something worth while seeking, attainable by methods more or less like mine. I do not want to father a flock, to be the fetish of fools and fanatics, or the founder of a faith whose followers are content to echo my opinions. I want each man to cut his own way through the jungle.

Thus, contemporary Thelemites may practice more than one religion, including Discordianism, Wicca, Gnosticism, Satanism, Setianism, and Luciferianism. Many adherents of Thelema, none moreso than Crowley, recognize correlations between Thelemic and other systems of spiritual thought; most borrow freely from the methods and practices of other traditions, including alchemy, astrology, qabalah, tantra, tarot, and yoga. For example, Nu and Had are thought to correspond with the Tao and Teh of Taoism, Shakti and Shiva of the Hindu Tantras, Shunyata and Bodhicitta of Buddhism, Ain Soph and Kether in the Qabalah.

Some organizations purport to stay true to Crowley's system, such as the A∴A∴ and Ordo Templi Orientis, though the current National Grand Master General of the U.S. O.T.O. Grand Lodge dismisses Rabelais as "some meaningless diversion", an opinion which was quickly rebutted.

Other organizations and persons who consider themselves Thelemites regard Crowley's system to be only one possible manifestation of Thelema, creating original systems, such as those of Nema (see below), Kenneth Grant, and Amado Crowley. Some of these accept The Book of the Law in some way, but not the rest of Crowley's "inspired" writings or teachings. Others take only specific aspects of his overall system, such as his magical techniques, ethics, mysticism, or religious ideas, while ignoring the rest.

The Fraternitas Saturni (Brotherhood of Saturn), founded in 1928 in Germany, accepts the Law of Thelema, but extends it with the phrase "Mitleidlose Liebe!" ("Compassionless love!"). The Thelema Society, also located in Germany, accepts Liber Legis and much of Crowley's work on magick, while incorporating the ideas of other thinkers, such as Friedrich Nietzsche, Charles S. Peirce, Martin Heidegger, and Niklas Luhmann.

In America, the writings of Maggie Ingalls (Nema) have inspired a movement called Maat Magick, along with an organization called the Horus-Maat Lodge, founded in 1979. This movement combines Crowley's essential elements of Thelema with Nema's system based on the Egyptian goddess Ma'at, as established in her received work, Liber Pennae Praenumbra. HML aims to combine the current Aeon of Horus with the future Aeon of Ma'at, where the combined mind of humanity will awaken and mankind will achieve balance.

One can also find Thelemites in other organizations. The president of the Church of All Worlds, LaSara Firefox, identifies as a Thelemite and sex magician. A significant minority of other CAW members also identify as Thelemites.

Contemporary Thelemic literature

By far, the bulk of Thelemic writing remains that of Aleister Crowley. He was highly prolific and wrote on the subject of Thelema for over 35 years, and many of his books remain in print. During his time, there were a few who wrote on the subject, including Charles Stansfeld Jones and J.F.C. Fuller. Since his death in 1947 only a few Thelemic voices have appeared in published books. Perhaps the four most published voices have been:

  • Israel Regardie, who not only edited many of Crowley's works, but wrote a biography of him—The Eye in the Triangle—and penned many books on ritual and Qabalah, such as Garden of Pomegranates, Golden Dawn, Middle Pillar, and Tree of Life.
  • Kenneth Grant, who has written many books on Thelema and the occult, such as The Magical Revival, Aleister Crowley and the Hidden God, Outside the Circles of Time, and Hecate's Fountain.
  • Lon Milo DuQuette, a popular author whose books are mostly dedicated to analyzing and exploring Crowley's system, including such books as Understanding Aleister Crowley's Thoth Tarot, The Chicken Qabalah of Rabbi Lamed Ben Clifford, The Magick of Aleister Crowley, and The Key to Solomon's Key.
  • Nema, whose Liber Pennae Praenumbra announces and explains the Ma'atian current has influenced Thelemites for over 25 years. She now has several books on Ma'atian Thelema including her book, Maat Magick.

Other notable contemporary writers who address Thelema include Jerry Edward Cornelius, Gerald del Campo, Allen H. Greenfield, Christopher Hyatt, Jason Augustus Newcomb, James Wasserman, and Sam Webster.

There are also numerous publications that print original Thelemic writing, such as the journals Cornelia, Journal of Thelemic Studies, Light In Extension, Lion & Serpent, The Scarlet Letter. (See External links).

Thelemic organizations

Several modern organizations of various sizes claim to follow the tenets of Thelema. The two most prominent are both organizations that Crowley headed during his lifetime, the A∴A∴—a teaching order designed to guide initiates through Crowley's mystical system of Thelema—and Ordo Templi Orientis—a fraternal order that initially developed from the Rite of Memphis and Mizraim of Freemasonry (which is considered irregular by most Masonic Grand Lodges and Grand Orients) and includes Ecclesia Gnostica Catholica (which celebrates the Gnostic Mass).

Since Crowley's death in 1947, other organizations have formed to carry on his initial work—for example, Phyllis Seckler's College of Thelema, the Ordo Templi Orientis of Kenneth Grant, Society O.T.O. of Marcelo Ramos Motta, OTO Foundation, Thelemic Order of the Golden Dawn, the Holy Order Of Ra-Hoor-Khuit, The Open Source Order of the Golden Dawn, and The Order of Thelemic Knights. Other groups of widely varying character exist which have drawn inspiration or methods from Thelema, such as the Illuminates of Thanateros and the Temple of Set. Groups such as Fraternitas Saturni, Horus-Maat Lodge, The Hawk and Jackal Covens, and The Thelema Society accept the Law of Thelema, but omit certain aspects of Crowley's system while incorporating the works of other mystics, philosophers, and religious systems.

Thelema in comparative religion

Thelema has been attracting more attention in recent years from scholars of religion, especially those interested in new religious movements, contemporary Gnosticisms and Hermeticisms. References at the end of this article supply a few such sources. Perhaps the most unusual attempt was made by bishop Federico Tolli, in his German book Thelema — Im Spannungsfeld zwischen Christentum, Logentradition und New Aeon For Tolli, Thelema is to be regarded as the dialectical consequence of Christianity. Christianity for Tolli exists as a community in Christ, whereas Tolli sees Thelema as a necessarily individualistic response to the world.

Taken from a 1938 theological dictionary (to the New Testament), the concept of 'salvation history' (Heilsgeschichte) has a great effect on Tolli's thought, and it is in this context that he discusses Crowleyan Thelema. Tolli regards Crowley's Heilsgeschichte as one in which the whole Universe (ergo the Will of God) is to combine (analogous to the Alchemical formula 'coagula'). "Love", in the form of combinatory attraction ("Love is the law, love under will"), is a universal principle — therefore akin to the concept of Natural religion. The main difference (for Tolli) is that in Christianity salvation of the entire Universe ("Ganzheit") cannot be made by 'solipsistic' man. The bishop sees Crowley as a failed – however talented – artist or "Mystagogie", but not as a "Satanist". The merit and contribution of bishop Tolli to Thelemic studies lies in the fact that it was he who first expresses that the genuine meaning and idea of Thelema does not necessarily contradict the teachings of Jesus, as Crowley himself affirms.

See also

Notes

  1. ^ "Crowley is misunderstood if he is seen primarily as the teacher of a new path to liberation, his sexual yoga and the abbey as a means of imparting this, with the theory behind it boiled down to the crude schematism of paths to enlightenment. He was part of a greater, far more intelligible tradition. Thelema itself is a rationally intelligible ideal that goes back to Rabelais, via Sir Francis Dashwood. Crowley gave this distinguished western tradition a new degree of development." Moore, John S. Aleister Crowley as Guru in Chaos International, Issue No. 17.
  2. ^ Sutin, Lawrence. Do What Thou Wilt: A Life of Aleister Crowley, p. 126. New York, NY: St. Martin's Griffin, 2002. ISBN 978-0312288976.
  3. ^ Pocetto, Alexander T. Rabelais, Francis de Sales and the Abbaye de Thélème, retrieved July 20, 2006.
  4. e.g. John 1:12–13
  5. e.g. 2 Timothy 2:26
  6. ^ Rabelais, François. Gargantua and Pantagruel. Everyman's Library. ISBN 978-0679431374
  7. ^ "The origin of 'Do what though wilt' is Rabelais' Abbey of Thelema in Gargantua and Pantagruel. The Hell Fire Club was deliberately copying Rabelais. Crowley, of course, had read Rabelais and undoubtedly knew about the Hell Fire Club (which is more correctly called the Abbey of Saint Francis, by the way), but he claimed to have received the Law of Thelema ... from a Higher Intelligence which contacted him in Cairo in 1904." Wilson, Robert Anton. The Illuminati Papers. Ronin Publishing, 1997. ISBN 1579510027
  8. ^ Encyclopedia Britannica (1911). Buckingham.
  9. ^ IAO131. Thelema & Buddhism in Journal of Thelemic Studies, Vol. 1, No. 1, Autumn 2007, pp. 18-32
  10. ^ "Francis Dashwood, who revived the Rablelais 'Abbey of Thelema'..." Adams, Ron. Ecumenical Thelema in Ashé Journal, Vol. 3, No. 4, Spring Equinox 2004, pp. 71-78
  11. ^ "Many years later, Sir Francis Dashwood revived the Abbey and its delightful law in the grounds of his country residence not far from London.", "In more recent history Saint Aleister Crowley, who did much to reform and revive the Western Occult Tradition, in reverence to the Rabelaisian masterpiece also revived the Thelemic Law; and even, for a short period, established an Abbey on an Italian island.", "It may be new to those who read this manuscript, but the identical rule or law has been held in the highest respect in India and neighboring countries for thousands of years. It has been the amoral philosophy of the Nathas, Tantriks, and Siddha saints and sadhus. It made possible the Parivrajaka or homeless wanderer saints, and eventually led to the highest grade of Indian spiritual attainment known as Avadhoota or emancipated one. Thus Rabelais, Dashwood, and Crowley must share the honor of perpetuating what has been such a high ideal in most of Asia." Mahendranath (1990).
  12. ^ Skinner, Stephen (ed). The Magical Diaries of Aleister Crowley: Tunisia 1923, p.149, n. 12. Weiser, 1996. ISBN 0877288569
  13. ^ "Therefore, we can say, by this definition, a Thelemite is a person who is free, well-born, well-bred and capable of interacting in honest company. A Thelemite has an inherent sense of honour and a sense of proportion and discretion. ... Much of Crowley's work is an interpretation and extension of this simple summary." Alamantra, Frater. Looking Into the Word: Some Observations in Ashé Journal, Vol. 3, No. 4, Spring Equinox 2004, pp. 39-59
  14. Crowley, Aleister.Liber XIII vel Graduum Montis Abiegni: A Syllabus of the Steps Upon the Path, retrieved July 7, 2006. For confirmation that the order in question took the Book of the Law as an official document of the order that "may be changed not so much as the style of a letter," A syllabus of the official instructions of the A∴A∴ by Aleister Crowley. "This book is the foundation of the New Aeon, and thus of the whole of our Work." First section, list of Class "A" Publications, retrieved July 7, 2006. And finally, for the part calling Thelema the word of the Law: Crowley, Aleister. Liber AL vel Legis, I:39-40
  15. "Svecchacara " John, Jeffrey. Esalen: America and the Religion of No Religion, p. 430. University of Chicago Press, 2007. ISBN 0226453693
  16. "The guiding tenet of this religious philosophy is svecchacara, do as you please, and its psychological justification is grounded in the profound Hindu psycho-analytical insight" Singh, Kapur; Singh, Piar; Kaur, Madanjit. Pārāśarapraśna: an enquiry into the genesis and unique character of the order of the Khalsa with an exposition of the Sikh tenets, p. 16. Amritasar: Dept. of Guru Nanak Studies, Guru Nanak Dev University, 1989.
  17. "Such an one is a Svechacari whose way is Svechacara or 'do as you will'." Woodroffe, John. Shakti and Shakta, ch. 27. ISBN 1595479201
  18. Augustine of Hippo Sermon on 1 John 7, 8 Cf. Augustine On Galatians 6:1: "And if you shout at him, love him inwardly; you may urge, wheedle, rebuke, rage; love, and do whatever you wish. A father after all, doesn’t hate his son; and if necessary, a father gives his son a whipping; he inflicts pain, to insure well-being. So that’s the meaning of in a spirit of mildness (Gal. 6:1).” Sermon 163B:3:1, The Works of Saint Augustine: A New Translation for the 21st Century, (Sermons 148-153), 1992, part 3, vol. 5, p. 182. ISBN 1565480074
  19. Stillman, Peter G. "Utopia and Anti-Utopia in Rousseau's Thought" in Rubin & Stroup (1999), p. 60
  20. Aeurbach, Erich (1946). Mimesis: The Representation of Reality in Western Literature (50th Aniv. Edition). Princeton University Press, 2003. ISBN 978-0691113364
  21. ^ Grand Lodge of British Columbia and Yukon. The Hell-fire Clubs, retrieved July 22, 2006
  22. Coppens, Philip (2006). Hell, no damnation. Retrieved July 21, 2006.
  23. quoted in Sainsbury (2006), p.111
  24. Towers (1987) quoted in Coppens (2006)
  25. Howard, Mike. The Hellfire Club, retrieved July 22, 2006
  26. Willens, Daniel. The Hell-Fire Club: Sex, Politics, and Religion in Eighteenth-Century England in Gnosis, summer 1992. Retrieved July 22, 2006
  27. "The Modern Thelemites", 29 October 1863. Published in Soldier and Scholar: Basil Lanneau Gildersleeve and the Civil War by Basil Lanneau Gildersleeve. University of Virginia Press, 1998. retrieved February 8, 2008.
  28. poem, The Ladies' Crambambull, "by A. Thelemite". Published in Tait's Edinburgh Magazine by William Tait, Christian Isobel Johnstone, 1841. Online version from Google Books retrieved February 8, 2008.
  29. Skinner, Stephen (ed). The Magical Diaries of Aleister Crowley: Tunisia 1923, p. 79, n. 8. Weiser, 1996. ISBN 0877288569
  30. Meretrix, Magdalene. The Thelema Tradition in Witchvox, July 14, 2001
  31. Skinner, p.149, n. 12
  32. ^ Crowley, Aleister (1926). The Antecedents of Thelema in Thelema Lodge Calendar for November 1993 e.v., retrieved July 4, 2006
  33. Crowley, Aleister. Liber XV, The Gnostic Mass.
  34. Crowley, Aleister. "De Lege Libellum", in The Equinox III(1) (Detroit: Universal, 1919).
  35. Crowley, Aleister. Liber II The Message of The Master Therion in The Equinox III(1) (Detroit: Universal, 1919), retrieved July 6, 2006
  36. Crowley, Aleister. Liber AL vel Legis, I:40
  37. Crowley, Aleister. Liber AL vel Legis, I:57
  38. Crowley, Aleister. Liber AL vel Legis, III:60
  39. Crowley, Aleister. The Equinox of the Gods. New Falcon Publications, 1991. ISBN 978-1561840281
  40. Farr, F., & Shakespear, O. The Beloved of Hathor and the Shrine of the Golden Hawk. Croydon. Farncombe & Son. Dating uncertain, approx. 1902
  41. Evans, Dan. Aleister Crowley and the 20th Century Synthesis of Magick, p. 10, pp. 26-30. Hidden Publishing, Second Revised Edition, 2007. ISBN 978-0-9555237-2-4
  42. Crowley, Aleister. Liber AL vel Legis
  43. Frater U.D. High Magic: Theory & Practice. Llewellyn Worldwide, 2005. ISBN 0738704717
  44. Crowley, Aleister. The Old and New Commentaries to Liber AL, I,52.
  45. Sutin, p. 294.
  46. Hymenaeus Beta (ed.) in Crowley, Aleister. The Goetia: The Lesser Key of Solomon the King, p. xxi. Red Wheel, 1995. ISBN 087728847X
  47. Crowley, Aleister. Liber O, I.2-5
  48. Liber E vel Exercitiorum, section I in its entirety.
  49. Crowley, Aleister. Magick, Book 4
  50. ^ Orpheus, Rodney. Abrahadabra: Understanding Aleister Crowley's Thelemic Magick, pp. 33-44. Weiser, 2005. ISBN 1578633265
  51. Crowley, Aleister. Liber AL vel Legis, II,6.
  52. DuQuette, Lon Milo in Orpheus, Rodney. Abrahadabra, p. 1
  53. Crowley, Aleister. Magick, Book 4, Introduction to Part III
  54. Gardner, Gerald Brosseau. The Meaning of Witchcraft, p. 86. Red Wheel, 2004. ISBN 1578633095
  55. "Concerning they Travellings in thy Body of Light, or Astral journeys and Visions so-called, do thou lay this Wisdom to thy Heart, o my Son, that in this Practice, whether Things Seen and Heard be Truth and Reality, or whether they be Phantoms in the Mind, abideth this Supreme Magical Value, namely: Whereas the Direction of such Journeys is consciously willed, and determined by Reason, and also unconsciously willed, by the true Self, since without It no Invocation were possible, we have here a Cooperation of Alliance between the Inner and the Outer Self, and thus an Accomplishment, at least partial, of the Great Work." Crowley, Aleister. DE VIA PER EMPYRAEUM in Liber Aleph Vel CXI: The Book of Wisdom or Folly (cap. 15). Weiser Books. ISBN 978-0877287292
  56. Crowley, Aleister. Magick, Book 4
  57. ^ DuQuette, Lon Milo. The Magick of Thelema
  58. Pearson, Joanne. A Popular Dictionary of Paganism, p. 44. Routledge, 2002. ISBN 0700715916
  59. Orpheus, pp. 9-16, 45-52
  60. Wasserman, James. Aleister Crowley and the Practice of the Magical Diary. Weiser, 2006. ISBN 1578633729
  61. Urban, Hugh. Magia Sexualis: Sex, Magic, and Liberation in Modern Western Esotericism. University of California Press, 2006. ISBN 0520247760
  62. ^ Hessle, Erwin. "The Ethics of Thelema" in The Journal of Thelemic Studies, Vol. 1, No. 1 (Autumn 2007).
  63. Crowley, Aleister. The Old and New Commentaries to Liber AL, II,28.
  64. Crowley, Aleister. Liber OZ
  65. ^ Crowley, Aleister. Magick, Book 4, Appendix I: "Official Instructions of the O.T.O", p. 484
  66. Crowley, Aleister. Duty.
  67. Crowley, Aleister. Liber II: The Message of the Master Therion
  68. ^ Rabinovitch, Shelley; Lewis, James. The Encyclopedia of Modern Witchcraft and Neo-Paganism,, pp. 267–270. Citadel Press, 2004. ISBN 0806524065
  69. Webster, Sam. Entering the Buddhadharma. Retrieved April 5 2005.
  70. De Lupos, Rey. The Golden Topaz of Radiant Light in Silver Star, No. 1. Retrieved April 5 2005.
  71. The Left Hand Path, Chapter XII of Magick Without Tears. Online version retrieved February 8, 2008.
  72. Crowley, Aleister. The Confessions of Aleister Crowley, ch. 66
  73. Crowley, Aleister. "777 Revised" in The Qabalah of Aleister Crowley. New York: Samuel Weiser, 1973. ISBN 0-87728-222-6
  74. National Grand Master General Sabazius X°. Address delivered by National Grand Master General Sabazius X° to the Sixth National Conference of the U.S. O.T.O. Grand Lodge, August 10, 2007
  75. Miller, Jason. Rabelaisian Rebuttal in Silver Star: A Journal of New Magick, Issue 8, Fall Equinox, 2007, p. 32
  76. Evans, Dave. The History of British Magick After Crowley, pp. 229-284. Hidden Publishing. ISBN 978-0-9555237-0-0
  77. Tolli, Federico. Thelema — Im Spannungsfeld zwischen Christentum, Logentradition und New Aeon. Leipzig, 2004.

Sources

References

  • Adams, Ron. Ecumenical Thelema in Ashé Journal, Vol. 3, No. 4, Spring Equinox 2004, pp. 71-78
  • Alamantra, Frater. Looking Into the Word: Some Observations in Ashé Journal, Vol. 3, No. 4, Spring Equinox 2004, pp. 39-59
  • Aeurbach, Erich (1946). Mimesis: The Representation of Reality in Western Literature (50th Aniv. Edition). Princeton University Press, 2003. ISBN 978-0691113364
  • Coppens, Philip (2006). Hell, no damnation. Retrieved July 21, 2006.
  • Crowley, Aleister. The Book of the Law / Liber AL vel Legis. Weiser Books, 2004. ISBN 978-1578633081
  • Crowley, Aleister. The Confessions of Aleister Crowley. Penguin, 1989. ISBN 978-0140191899
  • Crowley, Aleister. The Equinox of the Gods. New Falcon Publications, 1991. ISBN 978-1561840281
  • Crowley, Aleister. (1998). Magick: Book 4. 2nd ed. York Beach, Maine: Samuel Weiser. ISBN 978-0877289197
  • DuQuette, Lon Milo. The Magick of Aleister Crowley: A Handbook of the Rituals of Thelema. Red Wheel/Weiser. ISBN 978-1578632992
  • Evans, Dave. The History of British Magick After Crowley. Hidden Publishing. ISBN 978-0-9555237-0-0
  • Gardner, Gerald Brosseau. The Meaning of Witchcraft, p. 86. Red Wheel, 2004. ISBN 1578633095
  • Hessle, Erwin. "The Ethics of Thelema" in The Journal of Thelemic Studies, Vol. 1, No. 1 (Autumn 2007)
  • Howard, Mike. The Hellfire Club, retrieved July 22, 2006
  • Mahendranath, Shri Gurudev (1991). The Scrolls of Mahendranath. Seattle: International Nath Order. LCCN 97-0
  • Meretrix, Magdalene. The Thelema Tradition in Witchvox, July 14, 2001
  • Moore, John S. Aleister Crowley as Guru in Chaos International, Issue No. 17
  • Orpheus, Rodney. Abrahadabra: Understanding Aleister Crowley's Thelemic Magick. Weiser, 2005. ISBN 1578633265
  • Pearson, Joanne. A Popular Dictionary of Paganism, p. 44. Routledge, 2002. ISBN 0700715916
  • Pocetto, Alexander T. Rabelais, Francis de Sales and the Abbaye de Thélème, retrieved July 20, 2006.
  • Rabelais, François. Gargantua and Pantagruel. Everyman's Library. ISBN 978-0679431374
  • Rabinovitch, Shelley; Lewis, James. The Encyclopedia of Modern Witchcraft and Neo-Paganism. Citadel Press, 2004. ISBN 0806524065
  • Rubin, David Lee; Stroup, Alice (1999). Utopia 2: The Eighteenth Century. Rockwood Press. ISBN 1886365105
  • Sainsbury, John (2006). John Wilkes: The Lives of a Libertine. Ashgate Publishing. ISBN 0754656268
  • Skinner, Stephen (ed). The Magical Diaries of Aleister Crowley: Tunisia 1923. Weiser, 1996. ISBN 0877288569
  • Sutin, Lawrence (2000). Do What Thou Wilt: A Life of Aleister Crowley. New York, NY: St. Martin's Griffin, 2002. ISBN 978-0312288976
  • Towers, Eric (1987). Dashwood: The Man and the Myth. Crucible. ISBN 0-85030-427-X
  • U.D., Frater. High Magic: Theory & Practice. Llewellyn Worldwide, 2005. ISBN 0738704717
  • Urban, Hugh. Magia Sexualis: Sex, Magic, and Liberation in Modern Western Esotericism. University of California Press, 2006. ISBN 0520247760
  • Wasserman, James. Aleister Crowley and the Practice of the Magical Diary. Weiser, 2006. ISBN 1578633729
  • Willens, Daniel. The Hell-Fire Club: Sex, Politics, and Religion in Eighteenth-Century England in Gnosis, summer 1992. Retrieved July 22, 2006
  • Wilson, Robert Anton. The Illuminati Papers. Ronin Publishing, 1997. ISBN 1579510027
  • Public Domain This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domainChisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). Encyclopædia Britannica (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. {{cite encyclopedia}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)

Further reading

  • Frater Choronzon, THE HELLFIRE CLUB AND OTHER SWINGERS
  • Del Campo, Gerald. Rabelais: The First Thelemite. The Order of Thelemic Knights.
  • Melton, J. Gordon (1983). "Thelemic Magick in America." Alternatives to American Mainline Churches, ed. Joseph H. Fichter. Barrytown, NY: Unification Theological Seminary.
  • Starr, Martin P. (2004) A Hundred Years Hence: Visions of a Thelemic Future (Conference Paper presented at the Thelema Beyond Crowley )
  • Starr, Martin P. (2003). The Unknown God: W.T. Smith and the Thelemites. Bolingbrook, IL: Teitan Press.
  • van Egmond, Daniel (1998). "Western Esoteric Schools in the Late Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Centuries." in van den Broek, Roelof and Hanegraaff, Wouter J. Gnosis and Hermeticism From Antiquity To Modern Times. Albany: State University of New York Press.
  • Voxfire, Thomas (2004). "Something from Nothing: the Essence of Creation" in Essays for the New Aeon. Retrieved April 5 2005.

External links

Thelemic journals

Podcasts

Thelema
Organizations
Personalities
Thelemic texts
Concepts and ideas
Magick
Ceremony and ritual
Godforms
Symbolism
Related topics
Belief systems
Categories: