Revision as of 14:59, 1 April 2009 editEVula (talk | contribs)39,066 edits →Deleting archives of user talk pages: response← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:40, 1 April 2009 edit undoOttava Rima (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users20,327 edits →Now now: new sectionNext edit → | ||
Line 109: | Line 109: | ||
<small>Delievered by ] (]) at 20:00, 31 March 2009 (UTC)</small> | <small>Delievered by ] (]) at 20:00, 31 March 2009 (UTC)</small> | ||
== Now now == | |||
I was not defended vandalism. I was stating that an admin shouldn't block based on actions on their own page. Then I criticized you for closing a discussion pre-maturely. If you want to oppose, fine. But don't make it seem like I was saying the vandalism is correct. ] (]) 15:40, 1 April 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:40, 1 April 2009
user page // talk page admin • opining • matrix • fun • awards
This is EVula's talk page, which shouldn't be a surprise if you clicked the link... | |
---|---|
My general guidelines: | |
|
|
Archives |
|
Combine OverWiki, again 2
Hi, since you are not answering (and I wonder why), I asked the bureaucrats rights directly to the Wikia staff, and they were granted. I removed RelentlessRecusant and Donut THX 1138 and I might also remove you, since you are not contributing anymore. Removed admins could be replaced by other ones. Thanks for reading. Klow (talk) 23:23, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
- Bad EVula! *pokes with stick* ~ mazca 23:40, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
- That strikes me as a decent result of my inattentiveness to the wiki. I just didn't have time for it (and the past month or so has been incredibly hectic for me; for the entire month of March, I only edited here twice). EVula // talk // ☯ // 14:45, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages Signpost — 2 March 2009
This week, the Misplaced Pages Signpost published volume 5, issue 9, which includes these articles:
- Books extension enabled
- News and notes: Stewards, Wikimania bids, and more
- Misplaced Pages in the news: Misplaced Pages's role in journalism, Smarter Misplaced Pages, Skittles
- Dispatches: WikiProject Ships Featured topic and Good topics
- Wikiproject report: WikiProject Norse History and Culture
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 08:08, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages Weekly Episode 71
Misplaced Pages Weekly Episode 71: We have no shame has been released. You can listen and comment at the episode page, and, as always, listen to all of the past episodes and subscribe to the RSS feed at wikipediaweekly.org. WODUPbot 05:27, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
You're receiving this because you're listed on Misplaced Pages:WikiProject WikipediaWeekly/delivery. If you'd like to stop receiving these messages, please remove yourself from that list.
Misplaced Pages Signpost — 9 March 2009
This week, the Misplaced Pages Signpost published volume 5, issue 10, which includes these articles:
- News and notes: Commons, conferences, and more
- Misplaced Pages in the news: Politics, more politics, and more
- Dispatches: 100 Featured sounds milestone
- Wikiproject report: WikiProject Christianity
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 23:25, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
Ohio meetup location
Where should the Ohio meet up take place? The best option is probably wherever the most people can attend, so you opinion counts. See Misplaced Pages talk:Meetup/Ohio 1#Location !vote. I really hope that you can make the trip. It'd be fun. :) hmwithτ 20:53, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
- Word. EVula // talk // ☯ // 14:49, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
Apology
I'm sorry for my game back a while ago. There was no answer. I hope you forgive me. --WeezleBeezle (talk) 20:42, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
- The only apology I need from you is constructive edits. If you can do that, I'll happily consider it all water under the bridge. :) EVula // talk // ☯ // 14:56, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages Signpost: 16 March 2009
- News and notes: License update, Commons cartoons, films milestone, and more
- Misplaced Pages in the news: Manufactured scandal, Misplaced Pages assignments, and more
- Dispatches: New FAC and FAR appointments
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 22:41, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
Happy Birthday!
Happy Birthday, EVula, from the Misplaced Pages Birthday Committee! Have a great day! |
Versus22 talk 04:07, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages Signpost: 23 March 2009
- From the editor: Reviewing books for the Signpost
- Special report: Abuse Filter is enabled
- News and notes: Flaggedrevs, copyright project, fundraising reports, and more
- Misplaced Pages in the news: Alternatives, IWF threats, and more
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 03:58, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
Deleting archives of user talk pages
Got a question, EVula. You just renamed "Booglamay" to "Cycle~". He's now requesting that some archives of his former talk pages be deleted per U1. I know I'm not supposed to delete talk pages per U1, but I don't know about archives and I don't know about talk pages under the old name for recently renamed users. Can you fill me in? (Watchlisting) - Dan Dank55 (push to talk) 15:22, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
- Ah I've been meaning to ask someone about this. Is the answer yes you can delete archives that are copies of information from talkpages but not archives that are made by moving the talk page to archive n? That way all the talkpage info is available in page history to any editor. ϢereSpielChequers 17:48, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
- Bah, I did that back in December; hardly recent. :P
If the pages are just the leftover redirects that come from renaming, they can very safely be deleted under G6 (or U1, but I use G6 simply because it casts a bigger net). EVula // talk // ☯ // 14:59, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages Signpost: 30 March 2009
- From the editor: Follow the Signpost with RSS and Twitter
- Special report: Community weighs license update
- News and notes: End of Encarta, flagged revisions poll, new image donation, and more
- Misplaced Pages in the news: Censorship, social media in schools, and more
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 20:00, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
Now now
I was not defended vandalism. I was stating that an admin shouldn't block based on actions on their own page. Then I criticized you for closing a discussion pre-maturely. If you want to oppose, fine. But don't make it seem like I was saying the vandalism is correct. Ottava Rima (talk) 15:40, 1 April 2009 (UTC)