Misplaced Pages

User talk:Cs32en: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactivelyNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:14, 9 April 2009 editCs32en (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users10,891 edits Redirect  Revision as of 21:54, 9 April 2009 edit undoArthur Rubin (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers130,168 edits oopsNext edit →
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Please leave any messages for me . Please leave any messages for me .

I don't think this will translate, and the notification needs to be here for tracability.

] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]{{#if:World Trade Center controlled demolition conspiracy theories|&#32; according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, '''you may be ] from editing'''. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. If necessary, pursue ]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> — ] ] 21:54, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:54, 9 April 2009

Please leave any messages for me here.

I don't think this will translate, and the notification needs to be here for tracability.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on World Trade Center controlled demolition conspiracy theories. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 21:54, 9 April 2009 (UTC)