| Revision as of 20:56, 19 April 2009 editAymatth2 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors129,110 edits →Rudolf, Count of Rhaetia: delete← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:04, 19 April 2009 edit undoDreamGuy (talk | contribs)33,601 edits respone to person asking why I didn't redirectNext edit → | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| Disputed prod. Original prod (by ]) read: ''Historical figure notable for ]. Sufficient coverage provided at ]'' and I agree. It's just a stub that would never have a chance to be a fullfledged article, should just redirect to the mentioned article. ] (]) 20:18, 19 April 2009 (UTC) | Disputed prod. Original prod (by ]) read: ''Historical figure notable for ]. Sufficient coverage provided at ]'' and I agree. It's just a stub that would never have a chance to be a fullfledged article, should just redirect to the mentioned article. ] (]) 20:18, 19 April 2009 (UTC) | ||
| *Then why don't you redirect it? ] (]) 20:22, 19 April 2009 (UTC) | *Then why don't you redirect it? ] (]) 20:22, 19 April 2009 (UTC) | ||
| :Because the editor who removed the prod notice has a long history of aggressively reverting redirects and other actions and insists that a redirect is a delete so that a delete vote needs to be made. I disagree with him, but filing the AFD to prove to him that the article doesn't belong as is seems to be the only step he'll accept, otherwise edit wars and tagteaming/sockpuppets take over. It's easier just to AFD it. ] (]) 21:04, 19 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
| *I suspect that this article gives all the information that will ever be known about Rudolf: one line from the ]. ] (]) 20:56, 19 April 2009 (UTC) | *I suspect that this article gives all the information that will ever be known about Rudolf: one line from the ]. ] (]) 20:56, 19 April 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 21:04, 19 April 2009
Rudolf, Count of Rhaetia
- Rudolf, Count of Rhaetia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Disputed prod. Original prod (by User:WikiDan61) read: Historical figure notable for one event. Sufficient coverage provided at Bernard (son of Charles the Fat) and I agree. It's just a stub that would never have a chance to be a fullfledged article, should just redirect to the mentioned article. DreamGuy (talk) 20:18, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
- Then why don't you redirect it? Nyttend (talk) 20:22, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
- Because the editor who removed the prod notice has a long history of aggressively reverting redirects and other actions and insists that a redirect is a delete so that a delete vote needs to be made. I disagree with him, but filing the AFD to prove to him that the article doesn't belong as is seems to be the only step he'll accept, otherwise edit wars and tagteaming/sockpuppets take over. It's easier just to AFD it. DreamGuy (talk) 21:04, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
- I suspect that this article gives all the information that will ever be known about Rudolf: one line from the Annals of Fulda. Aymatth2 (talk) 20:56, 19 April 2009 (UTC)