| Revision as of 22:54, 9 May 2009 editPondle (talk | contribs)5,366 editsmNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:09, 9 May 2009 edit undoPondle (talk | contribs)5,366 editsmNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| :The lead already explains that it's a BRT system, so further repetition is unnecessary and looks like an attempt to "make a point". This argument was settled in February last year, so I fail to see what's going to be achieved by re-opening it- please see ]. ] (]) 17:19, 9 May 2009 (UTC) | :The lead already explains that it's a BRT system, so further repetition is unnecessary and looks like an attempt to "make a point". This argument was settled in February last year, so I fail to see what's going to be achieved by re-opening it- please see ]. ] (]) 17:19, 9 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
| ::The point is that it's not a metro system. Please stop being so unconstructive. And it was not settled, I still maintain the point. ] (]) 17:26, 9 May 2009 (UTC) | ::The point is that it's not a metro system. Please stop being so unconstructive. And it was not settled, I still maintain the point. ] (]) 17:26, 9 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
| :::I direct you to ]. Please stop disrupting the page, or I'll have to take this further. ] (]) 22:53, 9 May 2009 (UTC) | :::I direct you to ]. Please stop disrupting the page by ], or I'll have to take this further. ] (]) 22:53, 9 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 23:09, 9 May 2009
Metro system
The edit war over explaining that this isn't a rail-based system was not only very tedious, but also completely pointless. The opening sentence of the article clearly states that this is a bus-based system. I fail to see why any explanation of this is necessary--and certainly not in a hatnote: that's not their intended purpose at all. --RFBailey (talk) 14:59, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
As I've explained, the vast majority of articles titled X Metro will be metro systems. This is not. It's a bus route. All I'm doing is explaining that. Welshleprechaun (talk) 17:10, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
- The lead already explains that it's a BRT system, so further repetition is unnecessary and looks like an attempt to "make a point". This argument was settled in February last year, so I fail to see what's going to be achieved by re-opening it- please see WP:POINT. Pondle (talk) 17:19, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
- The point is that it's not a metro system. Please stop being so unconstructive. And it was not settled, I still maintain the point. Welshleprechaun (talk) 17:26, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
- I direct you to User_talk:Welshleprechaun/Archive2#Swansea_Metro. Please stop disrupting the page by perpetuating an old argument, or I'll have to take this further. Pondle (talk) 22:53, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
- The point is that it's not a metro system. Please stop being so unconstructive. And it was not settled, I still maintain the point. Welshleprechaun (talk) 17:26, 9 May 2009 (UTC)