| Revision as of 01:52, 14 April 2009 editCzello (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers41,223 edits Reply← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:50, 11 May 2009 edit undoFasach Nua (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers7,415 editsm →I, Borg: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
| :No problem :) <font color="#000000">''''']''''' ''''']'''''</font> 01:52, 14 April 2009 (UTC) | :No problem :) <font color="#000000">''''']''''' ''''']'''''</font> 01:52, 14 April 2009 (UTC) | ||
| == I, Borg == | |||
| ] | |||
Revision as of 21:50, 11 May 2009
Don't be afraid to leave me a message :) Richard BB
my "vandalism"
this "vandalism" was a result of a very boring Science teacher, who sent me and a few of my "vandal" friends to the library so we could work on study guides. she does that. anyway, what i said was all true. i appreciate your suggestion with the "sandbox" thing. that was nice of you. kind of. another thing: are you a direct relation to Richard Dawkins? or just a supporter? so yeah... message me back and we'll debate. about creation vs. evolution, i mean. sounds like fun, no? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hanso671 (talk • contribs) 00:50, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
- I did not give you the warning because I am a supporter of Richard Dawkins (although I am, that is irrelevant), I did it because of the vandalism. Even if you had vandalised the creationist article, I would have reverted the edits and made the same action - not because I believe in one thing or the other but because I am trying to help maintain Misplaced Pages. Please do not vandalise article in future just because you do not like the subject matter (or for any reason, for that matter). Richard BB 00:58, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
does this mean we can't debate? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hanso671 (talk • contribs) 17:24, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
- I'd rather not waste the time. Richard BB 21:35, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
Slander
"In law, defamation (also called calumny, libel, slander, and vilification) is the communication of a statement that makes a claim, expressly stated or implied to be factual, that may give an individual, business, product, group, government or nation a negative image."
http://en.wikipedia.org/Slander
Implying that the writers of the show were using a racist term towards the President based on one poster is a rather weak position.
Quanticles (talk) 01:22, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
- Hmm; in hindsight, you are probably right - I think it was a rather rushed edit on my behalf. Apologies. Richard BB 01:24, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
Re: User Page Edit
Haha, thanks. I hadn't noticed the problem. Cheers, ErikTheBikeMan (talk) 01:31, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
- No problem :) Richard BB 01:52, 14 April 2009 (UTC)