| Revision as of 13:17, 13 November 2005 editHeadleyDown (talk | contribs)1,509 edits →Arbitration← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 02:58, 22 November 2005 edit undoFred Bauder (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users46,115 edits →Arbitration: Accepted | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
| Hello AMaulden, and welcome to edit. I noticed your comments and they are well taken. The NLP page is very deep in terms of research, but it is all well cited, so you are welcome to sift through it and point out any inaccuracies or missed points as you wish. Feel free to research further using the citations as a pointer. Right now the alternative research page needs some attention because a lot of the comments there are bound to be biased. It is fairly easy to spot problems and there are too many for me to comment on at once. Anyway, enjoy and don't worry if you get a sockpuppet label. Anyone speaking negatively about NLP is bound to get one. Regards ] 13:17, 13 November 2005 (UTC) | Hello AMaulden, and welcome to edit. I noticed your comments and they are well taken. The NLP page is very deep in terms of research, but it is all well cited, so you are welcome to sift through it and point out any inaccuracies or missed points as you wish. Feel free to research further using the citations as a pointer. Right now the alternative research page needs some attention because a lot of the comments there are bound to be biased. It is fairly easy to spot problems and there are too many for me to comment on at once. Anyway, enjoy and don't worry if you get a sockpuppet label. Anyone speaking negatively about NLP is bound to get one. Regards ] 13:17, 13 November 2005 (UTC) | ||
| ==Arbitration accepted== | |||
| ] has been accepted. Please place evidence at ]. Proposals and comments may be made at ]. ] 02:58, 22 November 2005 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 02:58, 22 November 2005
Psychotherapist and mostly a lurker
Arbitration
AMaulden,
A complaint has been made against you in regard to the Nuero-linguistic programming article, with a request for arbitration. The basis of the case is that you are either a sock puppet, or otherwise involved with, breach of wikipedia policy and disruption to that article.
The request can be found at: Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration
FT2 09:36, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
Nice welcome FT2! HeadleyDown 13:17, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
Hello AMaulden, and welcome to edit. I noticed your comments and they are well taken. The NLP page is very deep in terms of research, but it is all well cited, so you are welcome to sift through it and point out any inaccuracies or missed points as you wish. Feel free to research further using the citations as a pointer. Right now the alternative research page needs some attention because a lot of the comments there are bound to be biased. It is fairly easy to spot problems and there are too many for me to comment on at once. Anyway, enjoy and don't worry if you get a sockpuppet label. Anyone speaking negatively about NLP is bound to get one. Regards HeadleyDown 13:17, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
Arbitration accepted
Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Neuro-linguistic programming has been accepted. Please place evidence at Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Neuro-linguistic programming/Evidence. Proposals and comments may be made at Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Neuro-linguistic programming/Workshop. Fred Bauder 02:58, 22 November 2005 (UTC)