Misplaced Pages

User talk:Stargnoc: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactivelyNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 05:56, 21 May 2009 editDaedalus969 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers19,809 edits Only warning: Personal attack directed at a specific editor. (TW Revision as of 06:30, 21 May 2009 edit undoDaedalus969 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers19,809 edits May 2009: rNext edit →
Line 3: Line 3:
== May 2009 == == May 2009 ==
] This is the '''only warning''' you will receive for your disruptive comments. <br> The next time you make a ]{{#if:|&#32;as you did at ]}}, you '''will''' be ] for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-npa4im --> — ''']]<sup> ]</sup>''' 05:56, 21 May 2009 (UTC) ] This is the '''only warning''' you will receive for your disruptive comments. <br> The next time you make a ]{{#if:|&#32;as you did at ]}}, you '''will''' be ] for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-npa4im --> — ''']]<sup> ]</sup>''' 05:56, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
:Well, given that you had attacked more than one editor, possibly in the post, with definitely more than one insult, not to mention you were saying what their political motivations were, I lost good faith with you. That level four is for assuming bad faith.— ''']]<sup> ]</sup>''' 06:30, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 06:30, 21 May 2009


May 2009

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive comments.
The next time you make a personal attack, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. — dαlus 05:56, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Well, given that you had attacked more than one editor, possibly in the post, with definitely more than one insult, not to mention you were saying what their political motivations were, I lost good faith with you. That level four is for assuming bad faith.— dαlus 06:30, 21 May 2009 (UTC)