| Revision as of 16:42, 21 May 2009 editDave souza (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators48,670 edits →Publicity and media coverage: University of New England← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:26, 21 May 2009 edit undoDinoguy2 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users39,966 edits →Taxonomy: this implies soebody is claiming it's a misisng link between primates and non-primates which is not the caseNext edit → | ||
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
| Franzen et al. in their 2009 paper explicitly place ''Darwinius'' in the "] group of early primates representative of early haplorhine<!-- sic, the paper spells "haplorhini" consistently--> diversification", casting doubt on the phylogenetic separation of Haplorrhini and Strepsirrhini prior to the adapiform group. | Franzen et al. in their 2009 paper explicitly place ''Darwinius'' in the "] group of early primates representative of early haplorhine<!-- sic, the paper spells "haplorhini" consistently--> diversification", casting doubt on the phylogenetic separation of Haplorrhini and Strepsirrhini prior to the adapiform group. | ||
| Older fossils are thought to represent the earliest anthropoids or the related ], and most experts hold that anthropoids evolved from tarsidae, while a smaller group agrees with Franzen et al. that the first anthropoids were ]. The view of paleontologist ] is that ''Darwinius'' is unlikely to end the argument.<ref name=dividedAustralian/> | Older fossils are thought to represent the earliest anthropoids or the related ], and most experts hold that anthropoids evolved from tarsidae, while a smaller group agrees with Franzen et al. that the first anthropoids were ]. The view of paleontologist ] is that ''Darwinius'' is unlikely to end the argument.<ref name=dividedAustralian/> | ||
| The Adapiformes, including ''Darwinius'', clearly post-date the phylogenetic separation of primates and non-primate ] such as the ]s, and therefore cannot be considered a "missing link" between primates and non-primates. This separation took place in the ], over 60 million years ago, during the diversification of the ] order. | |||
| ==Type specimen== | ==Type specimen== | ||
Revision as of 17:26, 21 May 2009
| Darwinius masillae Temporal range: Eocene, 47 Ma PreꞒ Ꞓ O S D C P T J K Pg N ↓ | |
|---|---|
| File:Darwinius masillae.jpg | |
| Slab (specimen PMO 214.214) and counter-slab (specimen WDC-MG-210 reversed for comparison) of the Darwinius masillae holotype fossil | |
| Scientific classification | |
| Kingdom: | Animalia |
| Phylum: | Chordata |
| Class: | Mammalia |
| Order: | Primates |
| Family: | Notharctidae |
| Subfamily: | Cercamoniinae |
| Genus: | Darwinius |
| Species: | D. masillae |
| Binomial name | |
| Darwinius masillae Franzen et al., 2009 | |
Darwinius is a genus of Adapiformes, a group of basal or stem group primates from the Eocene epoch. Its only known species is Darwinius masillae, dated to 47 million years ago (Lutetian stage). The genus Darwinius was named to celebrate Charles Darwin on his bicentenary and the species name masillae honors Messel where the specimen was found. The creature appeared superficially similar to a modern lemur.
The only known fossil, dubbed Ida, was discovered in 1983 at the Messel pit, a disused shale quarry noted for its astonishing fossil preservation, near the village of Messel, about 35 km (22 mi) southeast of Frankfurt am Main. The fossil, divided into a slab and partial counterslab after the amateur excavation and sold separately, was not reassembled until 2006.
The authors of the paper describing Darwinius classified it as a member of the primate family Notharctidae, subfamily Cercamoniinae, suggesting that it has the status of a significant transitional form (a "missing link") between the prosimian and simian ("anthropoid") primate lineages.
Concerns have been raised about the claims made about the fossil's relative importance, and the publicising of the fossil before adequate information was available for scrutiny by the academic community.
Taxonomy
Further information: Primates, Adapid, and AdapiformesFranzen et al. (2009) place the Darwinius genus in the Cercamoniinae subfamily of the Notharctidae family within the extinct Adapiformes suborder of early primates.
Darwinius masillae is the third primate species to be discovered at the Messel locality that belongs to the cercamoniine adapiforms, in addition to Europolemur koenigswaldi and Europolemur kelleri. Darwinius masillae is similar but not directly related to Godinotia neglecta from Geiseltal.
The adapiforms are known from the fossil record only, and it is unclear whether they form a suborder proper, or a paraphyletic grouping. They are usually grouped under the Strepsirrhini semiorder and would as such not be ancestral to the Haplorrhini semiorder.
Franzen et al. in their 2009 paper explicitly place Darwinius in the "Adapoidea group of early primates representative of early haplorhine diversification", casting doubt on the phylogenetic separation of Haplorrhini and Strepsirrhini prior to the adapiform group. Older fossils are thought to represent the earliest anthropoids or the related tarsidae, and most experts hold that anthropoids evolved from tarsidae, while a smaller group agrees with Franzen et al. that the first anthropoids were adapidae. The view of paleontologist Tim White is that Darwinius is unlikely to end the argument.
Type specimen
The type specimen is a 95%-complete fossil, missing only its left rear leg. It has been named Ida after the daughter of Dr Jørn Hurum, the Norwegian vertebrate paleontologist from the Natural History Museum, University of Oslo, who secured one section of the fossil from an anonymous owner, and led the research. In addition to the bones, an imprint of Ida's soft tissue and fur outline is present, along with remnants of her last meal of fruit and leaves.
The fossil is placed within the primate family tree along with other fossil primates. Ida was originally thought to be a primitive lemur, but comparative tests revealed her to have anthropoid features. This indicates that she is a transitional fossil between primitive lemur-like primates and the monkeys, including the human lineage. Two of the key anatomical features found in lemurs are not present in the fossil: a grooming claw on the foot and a fused row of teeth, a toothcomb, in the bottom jaw. Instead, she has a short face with forward-facing eyes like humans as opposed to the long face of a lemur, nails instead of claws, and teeth similar to those of monkeys. The fossil's hands have five fingers and exhibit human-like opposable thumbs. These would have provided a "precision grip" which, for Ida, was useful for climbing and gathering fruit. Ida also has flexible arms and relatively short limbs.
Digital reconstructions of Ida's teeth reveal that she has unerupted molars in her jaw, indicating that she was about 8 months old, or the equivalent of a 6-year-old human. The shape of Ida's teeth provides clues as to her diet; jagged molars would have allowed her to slice food, suggesting that she was a leaf and seed eater. This is confirmed by the remarkable preservation of her gut content. Furthermore the lack of a baculum (penis bone) found in all lower primates means that the fossil was from a female. X-rays performed on Ida revealed that her left wrist was healing from a fracture, which may have contributed to her death. The scientists speculate she was overcome by carbon dioxide fumes whilst drinking from the Messel lake. Hampered by her broken wrist, she slipped into unconsciousness, was washed into the lake and sank to the bottom, where unique fossilisation conditions preserved her for 47 million years.
Discovery and publication
The significance of the fossil was first recognized by vertebrate palaeontologist Hurum, who uncovered the specimen through a chance encounter at the Hamburg Fossil and Mineral Fair in 2006, where a dealer offered the fossil for $1 million. It had been discovered 23 years earlier by a fossil hunter and remained in a private collection. Hurum purchased the specimen for his museum based on photographs alone.
After its rediscovery it was studied in secret for two years by a team of scientists; Hurum was joined by primate evolution expert Professor Philip Gingerich of the University of Michigan, and palaeontologists Dr. Jens Franzen and Dr. Jörg Habersetzer of the Senckenberg Museum's Research Institute.
On May 19, 2009, they revealed their findings to the world in a paper published in PLoS ONE, the open access journal of the Public Library of Science. The fossil was described as the "missing link" in human evolution that had long been sought by paleontologists, although some questioned this assertion. Brian Switek, while describing the fossil as spectacularly complete and "the first time a fossil primate has been found exhibiting such extraordinary preservation", deplores the sensationalist coverage and lack of adequate research in the published paper to back claims that it is an ancestor of the earliest anthropoids, that is, the "higher primates" infraorder grouping all monkeys and apes.
Publicity and media coverage
The paper on the fossil was accompanied by a documentary (Uncovering Our Earliest Ancestor: The Link), made by Atlantic Productions in the UK, to be screened on the History Channel (US) and BBC One (UK) – directed by Tim Walker and produced by Lucie Ridout. A book The Link: Uncovering Our Earliest Ancestors by Colin Tudge and a website, were also launched to explain the significance of the fossil to a broader audience. The New York Daily News noted that "The unveiling of the fossil came as part of an orchestrated publicity campaign unusual for scientific discoveries." One of the paper's co-authors, paleontologist Philip D. Gingerich, told The Wall Street Journal that they had chosen to publish in PLoS as "There was a TV company involved and time pressure" and they had been pushed to finish the study.
At the time its discovery was announced in the scientific and the popular press, the fossil was characterized as the "most complete fossil primate ever discovered"; Sir David Attenborough has described it as "extraordinary". Google commemorated the unveiling with a themed logo on May 20, 2009. During a ceremony at the American Museum of Natural History Hurum said that "This specimen is like finding the Lost Ark for archeologists" and "It is the scientific equivalent of the Holy Grail. This fossil will probably be the one that will be pictured in all textbooks for the next 100 years."
Independent experts have raised concern about publicity exaggerating the importance of the find before information was available for scrutiny. Paleoanthropologist Elwyn Simons of Duke University stated that is was a wonderful specimen but most of the information had been previously known, and paleoanthropologist Peter Brown of the University of New England said that the paper had insufficient evidence that Darwinius was the ancestral anthropoid. Others have also criticized claims that the fossil represents the "missing link in human evolution", arguing that there is no such thing unless evolution is visualized as a chain as there are an enormous number of missing branches, and that while the fossil is a primate, there is no evidence to suggest that its species is a direct ancestor of humans.
See also
Notes
- ^ Franzen, Jens L. (2009). "Complete Primate Skeleton from the Middle Eocene of Messel in Germany: Morphology and Paleobiology". PLoS ONE. 4 (5): e5723. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0005723.
{{cite journal}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter:|month=(help); Unknown parameter|coauthors=ignored (|author=suggested) (help)CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link) - ^ Christine McGourty (19 May 2009). "Science & Environment; Scientists hail stunning fossil". BBC News. Retrieved 2009-05-20.
- "Deal in Hamburg bar led scientist to Ida fossil, the 'eighth wonder of the world'". The Guardian. May 20, 2009. Retrieved 2009-05-20.
- Wilford, John Noble (May 16, 2009). "Analysis Shows German Fossil to Be Early Primate". New York Times.
{{cite news}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter:|coauthors=(help) - ^ Brian Switek (May 19, 2009). "Poor, poor Ida, Or: "Overselling an Adapid: Laelaps". Retrieved 2009-05-20. Cite error: The named reference "poorIda" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
- Callum Ross, Richard F. Kay, Anthropoid origins: new visions, Springer, 2004, ISBN 9780306481208, p. 100
- ^ Leigh Dayton (May 21, 2009). "Scientists divided on Ida as the missing link | The Australian". Retrieved 2009-05-21.
- "Norske forskere: – Har funnet «the missing link»". Retrieved 2009-05-20.
{{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter:|coauthors=(help) - Watts, Alex (May 20, 2009). "Scientists Unveil Missing Link In Evolution". Sky News. Retrieved 2009-05-21.
- Early Primate Provides Evolution Clues, a May 19, 2009 article from ABC News
- ^ ""MISSING LINK" FOUND: New Fossil Links Humans, Lemurs?". National Geographic. May 19, 2009. Retrieved 2009-05-20.
- Scientists Unveil Missing Link In Evolution An early article on Yahoo.com
- Fossil Ida: extraordinary find is 'missing link' in human evolution, a 19 May 2009 article from The Guardian
- Little Brown, 2009
- Hurum, Jørn (2009). "revealingthelink.com". Retrieved 2009-05-20.
- ^ Samantha Strong and Rich Schapiro (May 19, 2009). "Missing link found? Scientists unveil fossil of 47 million-year-old primate, Darwinius masillae". Retrieved 2009-05-20.
- A History Channel documentary, The Link, devoted to the discovery is slated to air 25 May 2009.
- The Implications from revealingthelink.com
- "The Missing Link – Google Fossil Logo 2009". Google. May 20, 2009. Retrieved 2009-05-20.
- "Let's Not Go Ape Over Ida". New York Times. May 20, 2009. Retrieved 2009-05-20.