| Revision as of 03:10, 23 May 2009 editDGG (talk | contribs)316,874 edits →Megapolisomancy← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:11, 23 May 2009 edit undoDGG (talk | contribs)316,874 edits →MegapolisomancyNext edit → | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| :{{la|Megapolisomancy}} (<span class="plainlinks">]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude> | :{{la|Megapolisomancy}} (<span class="plainlinks">]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude> | ||
| I hate to do this (because I like the novel), but this article treats its subject from a basically in-universe, and unsourced, perspective; and I know of no ] that treat it otherwise. Certainly, any literary study that mentions ''Our Lady of Darkness''—about we don't even have an article—has to , but in the absence of sources treating the concept significantly from a real-world perspective (discussing sources or analogues of Leiber's notion, for instance), I don't see that an article on the concept can be admitted here. This fails ]. ] (]) 02:10, 23 May 2009 (UTC) | I hate to do this (because I like the novel), but this article treats its subject from a basically in-universe, and unsourced, perspective; and I know of no ] that treat it otherwise. Certainly, any literary study that mentions ''Our Lady of Darkness''—about we don't even have an article—has to , but in the absence of sources treating the concept significantly from a real-world perspective (discussing sources or analogues of Leiber's notion, for instance), I don't see that an article on the concept can be admitted here. This fails ]. ] (]) 02:10, 23 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Write and merge''' The novel should have an article, and a somewhat abridged account of this should be part of that article. Had I encountered this, I would have constructed a stub article, and done the merge, instead of bringing it here. ''']''' (]) 03:10, 23 May 2009 (UTC) | *'''Write and merge''' The novel should have an article, and a somewhat abridged account of this should be part of that article. Had I encountered this, I would have constructed a stub article, and done the merge, instead of bringing it here. But the nom could do it better, because he knows the book, and I do not. ''']''' (]) 03:10, 23 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 03:11, 23 May 2009
Megapolisomancy
- Megapolisomancy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
I hate to do this (because I like the novel), but this article treats its subject from a basically in-universe, and unsourced, perspective; and I know of no reliable sources that treat it otherwise. Certainly, any literary study that mentions Our Lady of Darkness—about we don't even have an article—has to mention this concept, but in the absence of sources treating the concept significantly from a real-world perspective (discussing sources or analogues of Leiber's notion, for instance), I don't see that an article on the concept can be admitted here. This fails WP:N. Deor (talk) 02:10, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
- Write and merge The novel should have an article, and a somewhat abridged account of this should be part of that article. Had I encountered this, I would have constructed a stub article, and done the merge, instead of bringing it here. But the nom could do it better, because he knows the book, and I do not. DGG (talk) 03:10, 23 May 2009 (UTC)