Misplaced Pages

User talk:AdjustShift: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:50, 31 May 2009 editMolobo (talk | contribs)13,968 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 16:56, 31 May 2009 edit undoLar (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators29,168 edits Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Molobo: to Piotrus.Next edit →
Line 17: Line 17:
::You're certainly technically capable of doing it. I believe it is within policy to do so as well... blocking user talk pages is an admin discretion thing. So I think you should go ahead and do so. Thanks for taking the decision to do it. ++]: ]/] 15:49, 30 May 2009 (UTC) ::You're certainly technically capable of doing it. I believe it is within policy to do so as well... blocking user talk pages is an admin discretion thing. So I think you should go ahead and do so. Thanks for taking the decision to do it. ++]: ]/] 15:49, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
:::Thanks for your input, Lar. Have a nice day! ] (]) 15:52, 30 May 2009 (UTC) :::Thanks for your input, Lar. Have a nice day! ] (]) 15:52, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

You too, and thanks again! ++]: ]/] 16:56, 31 May 2009 (UTC)


==]== ==]==
Line 29: Line 31:
::I am disappointed in your cryptic responses. I asked you a very simple question, you are refusing to answer. Please see my comment ]. --<sub><span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</span></sub> 15:54, 31 May 2009 (UTC) ::I am disappointed in your cryptic responses. I asked you a very simple question, you are refusing to answer. Please see my comment ]. --<sub><span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</span></sub> 15:54, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
:::The evidences are still being discussed on the functionaries list. There was no need to raise this at AN. I told you that when the right time comes, you will see the off-wiki evidences. ] (]) 16:29, 31 May 2009 (UTC) :::The evidences are still being discussed on the functionaries list. There was no need to raise this at AN. I told you that when the right time comes, you will see the off-wiki evidences. ] (]) 16:29, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
::::Piotrus: I think AdjustShift gave you the best answer that can be given right now. I'm not directly involved in the investigation but from seeing discussion, I know it's not run of the mill, and these things sometimes take time to work through. Sorry if that's confusing, but please don't give Adj. a hard time about it, ok? Thanks. ++]: ]/] 16:56, 31 May 2009 (UTC)


== DYK for Claude H. Van Tyne == == DYK for Claude H. Van Tyne ==

Revision as of 16:56, 31 May 2009

I will likely respond to new messages here on my talk page.

Archives

Thekohser/MyWikiBiz

Please see my reply to your blocking Greg from his talkpage here . Ripberger (talk) 05:47, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

Replied. AdjustShift (talk) 12:54, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
Absent a clear and compelling reason to keep the ban in place, I plan to change this. See User_talk:Thekohser. ++Lar: t/c 14:44, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

(Refactored from User_talk:Lar per my policy) I think Thekohser/MyWikiBiz should be allowed to edit one talkpage. AdjustShift (talk) 15:25, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

I'm willing to lift the block on the talk page of Thekohser. Can I? AdjustShift (talk) 15:27, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
You're certainly technically capable of doing it. I believe it is within policy to do so as well... blocking user talk pages is an admin discretion thing. So I think you should go ahead and do so. Thanks for taking the decision to do it. ++Lar: t/c 15:49, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for your input, Lar. Have a nice day! AdjustShift (talk) 15:52, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

You too, and thanks again! ++Lar: t/c 16:56, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Molobo

As an admin, I'd like to request a copy of this "secret evidence" :) Thanks, --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 17:58, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

I'll not be closing the SPI case. The case has been deferred to the CUs. AdjustShift (talk) 01:50, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
Nobody has told you specifically not to close (at least I have not, heck my last message to you was a suggestion on how to close as it would have been your first close), you can close it if you wish. I believe that there is an email to functionaries-l, and this has also been forwarded to arbcom (because of the existing case). I don't think a close of this case would be a good idea though without arbcom's endorsement of the result as there is an active case going and molobo has been around for quite a while. —— nixeagle 03:19, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
So what does this have to do with my request? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 06:22, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

I don't understand. My question is simple, and so should be your answer: "Yes, here you go" or "No, I'll not give you the evidence (that other admins have seen) because...". Please chose one of those and give me proper reply :) Thanks, --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 12:23, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

Sometimes you can't answer questions in yes/no, my dear. You've to wait for sometime. When the right time comes, you will see the off-wiki evidences. Have a nice day! AdjustShift (talk) 12:56, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
I am disappointed in your cryptic responses. I asked you a very simple question, you are refusing to answer. Please see my comment here. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 15:54, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
The evidences are still being discussed on the functionaries list. There was no need to raise this at AN. I told you that when the right time comes, you will see the off-wiki evidences. AdjustShift (talk) 16:29, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
Piotrus: I think AdjustShift gave you the best answer that can be given right now. I'm not directly involved in the investigation but from seeing discussion, I know it's not run of the mill, and these things sometimes take time to work through. Sorry if that's confusing, but please don't give Adj. a hard time about it, ok? Thanks. ++Lar: t/c 16:56, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Claude H. Van Tyne

Updated DYK query On May 31, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Claude H. Van Tyne, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Dravecky (talk) 02:21, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

WP:BABEL

I gather that English is not your native language. Please consider BABEL templates to indicate this in your userboxes - they also help of one wants to send you sources or such in non-English language. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 12:24, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

English is not my native language, but I may speak American. :-) I can't use BABEL templates because of privacy concerns. On the English-language Misplaced Pages, I use sources in the English language only. AdjustShift (talk) 12:56, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

Questions

  • 1-Is this your first SPI case ?
  • 2-You commented that you are not neutral. Shouldn't the clerk remain neutral ?
  • 3-Why did you congratulate Scinurae for "evidence" without waiting for my comments and defence ?
  • 4-Why was "super sekret evidence" provided to a user with history of team taging with Scinurae against Polish users ?
  • 5-As I understand you are not experienced with Misplaced Pages-as you are from August 2008, correct ?

--Molobo (talk) 16:50, 31 May 2009 (UTC)