| Revision as of 13:37, 4 June 2009 editVsevolodKrolikov (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers5,238 editsm →Condoleezza Rice← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:08, 6 June 2009 edit undoUnomi (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers4,989 edits →Arbitration Request: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 94: | Line 94: | ||
| :If I have anything to say I'll use the article talk page. I encourage you to do the same. ] <sup>]</sup> 12:37, 4 June 2009 (UTC) | :If I have anything to say I'll use the article talk page. I encourage you to do the same. ] <sup>]</sup> 12:37, 4 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
| == Arbitration Request == | |||
| Please see ]. | |||
| Thanks, ] (]) 01:08, 6 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 01:08, 6 June 2009
For new users
If you are new here, welcome. The page Misplaced Pages:Welcome, newcomers has links to a tutorial, and answers to frequently-asked questions.
Archives
| This talk page is automatically archived by MiszaBot III. Any sections older than 14 days are automatically archived to User talk:Tom harrison/Archive 2007 . Sections without timestamps are not archived. |
Because of their length, the previous discussions on this page have been archived. If further archiving is needed, see Misplaced Pages:How to archive a talk page.
Previous discussions: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Pentagon
Hi. Well, it wasn't me who's undone one's version WITHOUT any explaination or argumentation. Next time you or any of your overzealous collegues undo my version, please write some argumentation at least, but most of all, please familiarize with the evidence depicted in the videos I've linked. Cheers.
Robotic Optical Transient Search Experiment
I'm just curious why this article was deleted. It was not a very complete article but it is an actual astrophysics experiment. --Mk421 (talk) 03:32, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
- It was created by a banned user, User:Pinktulip. Tom Harrison 10:49, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
Can it be restored? As far as I know the information was not false. Alternately, can I recreate it from scratch? The experiment made an important discovery in the study of gamma ray bursts which resulted in it being featured on the cover of the journal Nature. So it should probably have a Misplaced Pages page. --Mk421 (talk) 03:42, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
- It should not be restored, but you can recreate it from scratch - sorry for the inconvenience. Tom Harrison 11:46, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
BAPTIST UNION OF SOUTH AFRICA, Prominent South Africa Baptists, Rev Thomas Aitken
Hello Tom
I'm an avid of Misplaced Pages, enjoy browsing through various subjects on a regular basis.
After years of researching my ancestry, my own late Grandfather was proving elusive, until through a stroke of good luck and fortune, I discovered, very recently, that "Baptist Church", is actually 'Baptist Union'.
Silly me!
Anyway, imagine my delight in turning to trusty, faithfuly Misplaced Pages, as always and finding an interesting and informative section on 'The Baptist Union of South Africa'.
Then I was even more delighted to find a section on 'Rev Tom Aitken'. Click on it, aaaaaahhhhhhhh, it's been deleted!
Please re-instate, as I am burning with curiosity to see it.
Many thanks
Linnea Lynch
80.0.108.249 (talk) 21:35, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
The deleted article lacks sources, does not make any claim of notability, and may be largely copied from somewhere else without attribution. I'm not willing to restore it, but here's a summary of what the deleted article says:
- Thomas Aitken was a devout, hard-working, and well-liked Christian minister. Following his education at Harley College, he was at Cape Verdes Island from 1896 to 1897; St Helena from 1897 to 1905; Port Elizabeth, South Africa from 1905 to 1910; Durban from 1910 to 1918; Wynberg from 1918 to 1920; Germiston from 1920 to 1924; and in Kingwilliamstown from 1924 to 1935. He was General Secretary of the Baptist Union of South Africa from 1919 to 1935.
Hope this helps, Tom Harrison 22:02, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
George Shultz
Did something offend about the article, or was it just one of those misclick things? Ray 00:30, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
- No, I removed some material added by a banned user. Sorry for any inconvenience, Tom Harrison 12:20, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
Condoleezza Rice
Any reason why you've taken the Hoover institute reference out? VsevolodKrolikov (talk) 02:39, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
- As above, just because it was added by a banned user. No opinion on the content. Sorry for any inconvenience. Tom Harrison 12:21, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
- Okey Dokey. Thanks for responding so promptly. I've changed it back. By the way, are you sure that Thaiverb is a banned user? There's nothing to that effect on the user talkpage, and the edits s/he's done seem harmless to me.VsevolodKrolikov (talk) 13:37, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
Re your recent reversion on Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth
Hi Tom, Please discuss why you believe the edits were in the wrong, consider World_Trade_Center_controlled_demolition_conspiracy_theories is a more precise rendition of what they seem to support. Also consider what the source of 'outside their experience' actually relates to. I trust that you will self revert. Unomi (talk) 12:35, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
- If I have anything to say I'll use the article talk page. I encourage you to do the same. Tom Harrison 12:37, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
Arbitration Request
Please see Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Tom_harrison. Thanks, Unomi (talk) 01:08, 6 June 2009 (UTC)