Misplaced Pages

User talk:MarkGallagher: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:22, 29 November 2005 editDelldot (talk | contribs)Administrators47,018 edits thanks← Previous edit Revision as of 18:53, 29 November 2005 edit undoRoySmith (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators92,098 edits Your recent speedy delete on AfDNext edit →
Line 375: Line 375:
==Thanks== ==Thanks==
Thanks for reverting that vandalism to my user page! Peace, ] | ] 16:22, 29 November 2005 (UTC) Thanks for reverting that vandalism to my user page! Peace, ] | ] 16:22, 29 November 2005 (UTC)

== Your recent speedy delete on AfD ==

It looks like you speedied 4 or 5 items inside a single set of at/ab templates. Is that what you intended? --] 18:53, 29 November 2005 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:53, 29 November 2005

Archives

  1. User_talk:MarkGallagher/Archive1 - July–September 2005

Welcome to Misplaced Pages!

Hello MarkGallagher, welcome to Misplaced Pages!

Here are some tips:

If you feel a change is needed, feel free to make it yourself! Misplaced Pages is a wiki, so anyone (yourself included) can edit any article by following the Edit this page link. Misplaced Pages convention is to be bold and not be afraid of making mistakes. If you're not sure how editing works, have a look at How to edit a page, or try out the Sandbox to test your editing skills.

If, for some reason, you are unable to fix a problem yourself, feel free to ask someone else to do it. Misplaced Pages has a vibrant community of contributors who have a wide range of skills and specialties, and many of them would be glad to help. As well as the wiki community pages there are IRC Channels, where you are more than welcome to ask for assistance.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me on my talk page. Thanks and happy editing, Alphax  06:45, 1 October 2005 (UTC)

1000 edits

<homer>Mmmm....chocolate!</homer> Thanks for that mate, notice you're coming up to 1000 yourself. Will have to find a suitable award for when you do.

Cheers, CTOAGN 16:04, 2 October 2005 (UTC)

*In recognition of reaching 1000 edits, I've got you a beer. Cheers! CTOAGN 13:48, 4 October 2005 (UTC)

What RJFJR stands for

RJF is my initials, the JR at the end is for Junior, which I am. When you put them all together it is a palindrome, which I just think is cool. RJFJR 17:11, 4 October 2005 (UTC)

MegaGOFF

Information icon Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Misplaced Pages without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you.--131.111.8.101 12:26, 6 October 2005 (UTC)

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Misplaced Pages. --131.111.8.101 12:29, 6 October 2005 (UTC)

AEJ Collins

Hi Mark - Brookie here - thanks for the reverts on the above - I have blocked the weirdo concerned for 48 hours for this scholarship! I suspect he picked up on this article after I warned him over some earlier vandalism. Hey Ho - off for a beer now! :) ...en passant! 16:11, 6 October 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for supporting my RfA!

Dear Mark: Thank you very much for your support on my RfA! I am truly honoured that so many people consider me a trustworthy Wikipedian, and I am most appreciative of my newly-bestowed administrator privileges given to me by the community. Your kind words about me were greatly appreciated; I promise to only use my administrative privileges to assist the community in doing good work, and also to be calm, considerate and careful in working to make Misplaced Pages a better place. I sincerely hope I can live up to your description of "extreme awesomitude". :-) It has been a pleasure conversing via IRC with you; I look forward to further discussion, and collaborating with you here on the wiki. Best regards, --NicholasTurnbull | (talk) (e-mail) (cabal) 01:27, 8 October 2005 (UTC)

Andrew McFarlane

Sorry, I made a mess of that one. Humbly apologetic. Staying well away from here on. I think I was stuffing beans up my nose.

All the best. Bobo192|Edits 02:13, 11 October 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for your support on my RfA!

Thanks for your support of my adminship!! I was surprised at the turnout and support I got! If you ever have any issues with any of my actions, please notify me on my talk page! Thanks again! Ryan Norton 03:31, 13 October 2005 (UTC)

Image use

Hi!

Well, first, I'm a relative newcomer around here..I happened to notice that you had uploaded the image that is used in the Wayne Rooney article. I wanted to know if its ok to upload images from the site that you used. Will it be legal if I do so for other players' pics? Do I need to take permission from the webmaster of http://soccer-europe.com/? Thanks! --Aabha R 08:01, 13 October 2005 (UTC)

Thanks a ton!! You've made my day! :) --Aabha R 08:20, 13 October 2005 (UTC)

ManU

Why is Manchester United F.C. so popular with vandals? Aabha 12:16, 14 October 2005 (UTC)

True-blue Liverpudlian, huh? ;) Aabha 11:24, 15 October 2005 (UTC)

Sorry

Worry not, they talked me out of it. I'm sorry I scared you. -- Essjay · Talk 06:31, 17 October 2005 (UTC)

Eric the Illiterate and Mr Carr the Paranoid

Thanks for your comments. I do try not to bite, but it becomes difficult at times. The issue with Skyring wasn't stalking, it was just that he was an egotistical troll. As for Eric, I don't deny that he knows something about some things, but he is also illiterate, rude, antagonistic and opinionated, even on subjects he knows little about. What am I to do with someone who can't spell their own surname? Adam 14:12, 17 October 2005 (UTC)

I have a legitimate interest in most australian history pages. I suggest Mr Carr is paranoid and for some unstated reason he accuses me of stalking. By the way my name is CORRECTLY spelt. "What am I to do with someone who" is so insecure they flail around looking for errors in dark unlit places. Any one could describe him as equally "illiterate, rude, antagonistic and opinionated" just that we get on with it and submit to assertion backed with evidence. Please note my editing attempts of Mr Carr's 'History of Melbourne' recasting has been 85% accepted (which about my average for all my editing) by wikipedians. So I suggest he calm down and accept the reality of wikis--they are mass edited. Eric A. Warbuton 03:27, 18 October 2005 (UTC)

WP:PR

You'd have to wait till sat. I'm almost inactive these days. User:Nichalp/sg 19:38, 17 October 2005 (UTC)

My RfA

WikiThanks!

Hi MarkGallagher. Just wanted to thank you for supporting my RfA. I hope I will be able to live up to the confidence placed in me. --Cyberjunkie | Talk 03:52, 19 October 2005 (UTC)

Ill take up your offer...

Mark, as you kindly offered to review any of my editing attempts you may peruse these:South Australia-Victoria border dispute and Joint Sitting, Australian parliament, 1974 Fell free to edit at will. Eric A. Warbuton 04:29, 19 October 2005 (UTC)

Barnstar

Thank you...you and android have totally brightened an otherwise poor day. I really appreciate the feedback :-D EricN 23:36, 21 October 2005 (UTC)

Windows Vista

Please join the discussion at User_talk:Lewispb#WinVI before (or perhaps after) reverting my edits. --tyomitch 15:47, 22 October 2005 (UTC)

On Tony's RFC...

Your response to Davenbelle warmed my heart. Too often on Misplaced Pages we allow people to make outragious claims without comment because they are hurting someone else, and by responding we risk bringing ourselves into the fire and suffering because we decided to set things right. Davenbelle's reply was over the top, and I thank you for calling a spade a spade so clearly. --Gmaxwell 17:46, 22 October 2005 (UTC)

Thank You

Thank you Mark for expressing yourself on the Miguel Piñero issue. The dispute ended in friendly terms between Dali and myself. Take care Tony the Marine 07:18, 23 October 2005 (UTC)


barnstar

Hi thanks heaps for the barnstar. I had accidentally discovered photos on wiki commons relating to countries that werent being used, theres so many there that its been hard to choose which ones to use! cheers Astrokey44 12:57, 24 October 2005 (UTC)

AfD

Hello: Can you expand on your criticism of my edits on the AfD page? Am I not supposed to be discussing articles on the AfD pages? That article has been up for some time and my responses to others comments were made much earlier in the discussion before there were so many edits in place. Writing "factual, verifiable, and neutral," does not impress me as being an argument for inclusion as many people are these three things but do not meet any criteria for notability. I see trollderina post it repeatedly on AfDs with no further explanation for her vote. Being fairly new at this, I am curious what her reasons are for voting this way. Thanks.Gaff 14:41, 25 October 2005 (UTC)

  • Thanks for the reply. In this particular article, it seems that the playwrite is just too new and has onyl produced one play. My understanding is that this is not enough to warrant inclusion. I hate to send another users contributions down the drain, but maybe they would be better posted someplace else. My first WP article was promptly flushed and I reposted it on blogger. If you're interested see:http://christopherburkegibson.blogspot.com/ Gaff 20:25, 25 October 2005 (UTC)

Award

For continuing to keep tabs on non-free content and images, and for writing clean content to replace it wherever possible, I award you this barnstar. Rob Church 16:14, 28 October 2005 (UTC)

Thank you

G'day. Thank you for the welcome and the helpful hints. I appreciate it. You have done some great work on a number of articles. Very objective and non-partisan. I welcome editing with you in the future.Stones12 15:19, 29 October 2005 (UTC)

thanks...

At Kelly's request, I searched for the two images on the Richie Ryan (Highlander) page. I found a place where you might've gotten Image:Richieryan.jpg, but I can't determine its copyright status. Image:Rich123.jpg, however, doesn't exist in that form anywhere in Google's index. There's an image that looks like it might be the same original picture, only shrunk down and given a dodgy border, but that's clearly not your source. I've tagged both images appropriately. Cheers

Thanks for looking anyway. I had that pic (Rich123) for a long time, but someone else put the other pic, not me, so I don't know where he/she got it. Should I look for particular sources/websites that have same pics and then tagged it, although I didn't get the pic from that source (but at least have the same pics)? I mean, the pics have been around in the internet for almost ten years, who knows the originality of it, and the official website usually realease all the copyright... Which source should I use? Thanks. HoneyBee

Kelly thinks that Image:Rich123.jpg might be a cropped screenshot from Highlander. I wouldn't know, not having watched the programme (I don't even know if it's available in Australia), but if you can tell us whether or not it's an image that has appeared on the programme, that would be great. A screenshot would be fair use to illustrate the character of Richie Ryan (Highlander), and possibly (we haven't resolved this question) Stan Kirsch as well. --fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 07:46, 1 November 2005 (UTC) Retrieved

Either the pic was from promophoto (and it spreads around the internet) or there's a big posibility that it came from a screenshot. I watched the programme (it was 10 years ago), and the character appeared in that pose during opening montage/scene. Should we change it to fair use? And who should change it, anyone or the administrator? Thanks! HoneyBee

Thanks!

Thanks for the barnstar Mark! "Wow! My very first barnstar" I'm chuffed! :-)


The tips that keep on giving

My gratitude for your welcome message and the tips. Tastes like lead 09:25, 3 November 2005 (UTC)

My RfA

Thanks for your vote, but you are incorrect in saying I harassed a user. He said things behind my back on RedWolf24's talk page, saying that I am a Joe Somebody and not deserving. I did not say anything bad about him, so why is it harassing? He also apologized on my Talk page if you would have cared to look. Please explain, I'm very disappointed by these unfair oppose votes. The image tagging, as Durin noted, was only on one photo, we all make mistakes, nobody is perfect. My edit summaries have also been improving vastly since this RfA started, if you had looked at my recent contributions. Thanks again, and please explain your vote. — Wackymacs 16:14, 3 November 2005 (UTC)

Arsenious acid!

LOL, your message made me smile, I've not have the best of days and that cheered me up immensely! Thanks for tidying it up a bit - hopefully someone can create a new article, like you said. :) XYaAsehShalomX 19:54, 3 November 2005 (UTC)

Nominator AFD voting

You asked on an AFD, "What's this thing with the nominator voting now, anyway?" It says in WP:AFD#How_to_list_pages_for_deletion that the nominator should "Consider creating the first entry... to begin consensus gathering." Regards, --howcheng 20:22, 3 November 2005 (UTC)

I always thought that the nomination was assumed to be a vote for deletion unless otherwise specified (such as in listing orphaned nominations) since you're not supposed to bring pages to AFD unless you think they should be deleted in the first place, but then I had a couple where nobody voted and the closing admin stated "no votes recorded" and I thought, what about me? So I decided to add my own vote just to be explicit. (As a side note, I also think that if there aren't any votes, the AFD should get relisted, not closed). --howcheng 20:45, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
I put the text in question into the template, where's MarkGallagher's comment you're referring to? I'd love to participate in the discussion. - CHAIRBOY () 01:15, 4 November 2005 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Bullett

I've pitched an alternative solution at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Bullett. Let me know what you think! BDAbramson T 02:22, 4 November 2005 (UTC)

re:James Milner (footballer)

Hey! Thanks! Aabha | talk 12:51, 4 November 2005 (UTC)

Please look at this RfA

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_adminship/Ramallite Zeq 12:39, 5 November 2005 (UTC)

Johann Wolfgang's RfA

Thank you for your support on my RfA.If my RfA passes I will use my new abilities with the common interest in mind. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me.

Johann Wolfgang [ T ...C ] 15:23, 7 November 2005 (UTC)

Moving articles on afd

If you move an article that's on afd, please make sure that it still points at the discussion instead of a redlink. You can do this either by making a redirect (as I've done at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Dipankar Nagchoudhuri), or by editing the link in the afd notice. —Cryptic (talk) 12:30, 8 November 2005 (UTC)

A Question

You reverted a vote page for adminship. You reverted my comment. I would like to know why. ip,s can make comments. If you did not know that then I understand. I would appreciate your input on this. Thank you. 163.20.85.7 15:09, 8 November 2005 (UTC)

I appreciate what you did

Some of these days I will get an account but for now I watch to know. Your honesty gets my vote anytime.163.20.85.7 15:57, 8 November 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for supporting my RfA

I know I've been slow in saying this, but thanks for supporting my request for adminship. It was an honor to be both nominated and approved as an admin. If there is ever any adminish (is that a word :-) things you need help with, please let me know. --Alabamaboy 16:23, 8 November 2005 (UTC)

Nominator voting in AfD

Hi Mark, I saw your comment in Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Knights of Noblemen about not voting in addition to nominating. With respect, I disagree with your assertion. There are plenty of nominations where no delete vode is intended. Admins/Editors that are cleaning up incomplete AfD nominations for instance often create the afd2 and enter the afd3 entry in the logs without judgement on the document. Having the nominator put the first entry in does a few things: First, it sets the format to keep communication clear. Second, the intention of the nominator is clear (eg, they're not just cleaning things up). Third, if you'd like to change the official policy, please do so in the proper place, like Wikipedia_Talk:Articles for deletion, not in the text of your vote in an article. I'd like to hear your thoughts on this. You didn't respond the first time I inquired, so I fear you may not participate in talk (which would be unfortunate), but I remain cautiously optimistic. Best regards, CHAIRBOY () 16:53, 8 November 2005 (UTC)

Nominator AFD voting

You asked on User_talk:MarkGallagher#Nominator_AFD_voting "I put the text in question into the template, where's MarkGallagher's comment you're referring to? I'd love to participate in the discussion."

Though I don't know where the original remark came from, more recently he stated on Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Knights of Noblemen, "Please don't indulge in the silly habit of voting in addition to nominating."

I am interested in the proper protocol to follow when nominating articles for deletion as well (I vote as well as nom). Keryst 14:54, 8 November 2005 (UTC)

As far as I am aware, there is no proper protocol. Ben took it upon himself, despite previous discussion (see User:Kelly Martin's comment on AfD talk), to add the "you should also vote" text to the AfD instructions. It has now been removed. So let's not have any talk about uniliterally "changing official Misplaced Pages policy", please.
I understand why the "nominators should vote" suggestion was added: because of fears that nominators' intention might be ignored. However, I strongly disagree with it, as I explained on the AfD talkpage. The intention of the nominator should be made clear on this strength of her arguments; if it is not clear, then her arguments weren't very good, and no amount of copy 'n' paste "I, the nom, vote delete per nom" bullet points can – or should – hide that fact. The fact is that a great many votes on AfD are pathetic. "nn d", the stereotype paraded about outside AfD, is quite true. At least one person should be able to explain why an article is deleted, and that person is the nominator. By encouraging the nomination to be Just Another Vote (which we have all seen happen, and not just from the pen of User:ComCat), we are doing a grave disservice not just to the articles, but to anyone who doesn't choose to label themselves as an extreme inclusionist.
Why am I pointing this out in my comments to individual AfDs? For the same reason I am pointing out every good nomination, and every poor nomination. "AfD is broken", "the atmosphere is toxic", "the community is close-minded", all common refrains on Misplaced Pages, and not at all unjustified. I am trying to encourage good behaviour, and discussion on bad behaviour. It may not help, but it certainly cannot do any harm. Now, everyone I have asked about this nominator-voting thing has done one of three things: a) ignored the question; b) said "but I don't want my vote to be discounted if it gets close"; or c) said "it's in the instructions for using the template ... isn't it?". 'a' I can do nothing about, 'b' is patently silly, and 'c' is, as far as I am aware, entirely Ben's doing. I am hardly working against consensus; there is no consensus to work against.
I trust I have answered both your questions, if not necessarily to your liking. Feel free to contact me at any time; if I am unable to respond immediately, however, I may forget (go ahead and remind me if you must). fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 18:42, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
Hi there! I believe Kelly Martin severely mischaracterized my change, and have left a comment to that effect in the AfD talk. I understand and respect your position, but I still feel that anything that adds clarity to consensus should be strongly considered, especially for something like AfD. Regards, CHAIRBOY () 19:00, 8 November 2005 (UTC)

Thank you

I just wanted to thank you for your support of my RfA which finally passed! I greatly appreciate it! Ramallite 04:28, 9 November 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for the hearthy welcome!

Thank you for welcoming me to Misplaced Pages. As a computer science student, I use Misplaced Pages regularly as an 'objective' source of information. I try to do something back by watching the change-channel, and revert vandalism. However, there should be a more efficient way of contributing to the community... Can you help me with that? AngelovdS 20:01, 9 November 2005 (UTC)

Philwelch's RfA

Thanks for supporting my successful RfA! — Phil Welch 03:32, 10 November 2005 (UTC)

Merci beaucoup

Thanks for your vote of support on my nomination to become an administrator, Mark. I passed, and my floor rag has since been bestowed upon me. I swear that from here on out I will try an alcoholic beverage before speedily deleting it. ;) Please let me know if you need me to help with anything in particular! —BrianSmithson 16:30, 12 November 2005 (UTC)

Jtkiefer's RFB

MarkGallagher

Thanks for your support on my request for bureaucratship.

The final outcome was (17/17/4) meaning that it failed, if you have any advice on how I can be a better editor or administrator please don't hesitate to leave a message on my talk page. Thanks again for your support. Jtkiefer ----- 20:28, 13 November 2005 (UTC)

User:Ingoolemo/Threads/05/11/15a

Ianblair23's RfA

G'day Mark,

I would like to thank you for supporting me on my RfA. It closed with the final tally of 57/0/0. I can only hope I can live up to the expectations that this wonderful community of ours demands from each of its administrators. If you ever need anything, please just let me know. Cheers! -- Ianblair23 (talk) 04:48, 17 November 2005 (UTC)

my Rfa

Mark, that edit you cited while voting neutral was from a long time ago. There is another edit summary with almost the same lingo from August, though I can't find it right now...I can link it if you want. I recognize that edit summaries such as those appear very rude, but I assure you that they were completely tongue in cheek...I guess I have to work on my playful banter and ensure that edit summaries as those don't get misunderstood to be sentiments I actually have when the fact is that I actually don't feel that way. Let me know if you need any further clarification.--MONGO 05:15, 17 November 2005 (UTC)

Your RFA

Since we chatted about this on IRC, this notice is really for the benefit of anybody who may have your talk page on their watchlist (hi fellas!)

--Tony Sidaway|Talk 18:25, 18 November 2005 (UTC)

My RFA

Thanks for your support. I've now been made an administrator. I'll do my best not to let you down :) --Sherool (talk) 02:25, 19 November 2005 (UTC)

Frank Rijkaard cleanup

Hey fuddlemark,

Can you please look at this article and tell me what else needs to be done for the clean-up tag to go? I asked User:Mandel, who'd originally tagged it, but haven't got a response as yet, so thought I'll get your opinion. Thanks. -Aabha (talk) 18:43, 19 November 2005 (UTC)

I've removed most (hopefully all) of the copyvio stuff. Seems to be fine on that front now. Will work on rewriting/expanding the portions that seem incomplete sometime. -Aabha (talk) 06:45, 20 November 2005 (UTC)

Thank you!

Hi Mark,

Thank you very much for your support on my RfA. I was both surprised and delighted about the amount of support votes and all the kind words! If I can ever help with anything or if you have any comments about my actions as an admin, please let me know! Regards, JoanneB 14:48, 21 November 2005 (UTC)

GraemeL's RFA

Hi MarkGallagher,

I am now an administrator and would like to thank you for your support on my RfA. I was very surprised at the number of votes and amount of and kind comments that I gathered. Please don't hesitate to contact me if I mess up in the use of my new powers. --GraemeL 15:44, 21 November 2005 (UTC)

Explanation requested

Please elaborate on your comment “Please try to put more effort into your nominations...” in my AFD nomination at LukeSharp. It seems to me that my statement that the subject of the page does not exist should be an adequate explanation. It is not clear to me what more is needed. •DanMS 18:57, 21 November 2005 (UTC)

MONGO RfA

I am deeply appreciative for your reconsideration and for voting to support my RfA. The "butt" of my "joke", Rama also voted to support me as well and I hope you see that he knew me well enough to know that I certainly meant no harm. I am gald to see you are having an easier time of things than I did and wish you success in your soon to be promotion as well. I'll see you areound and happy editing!--MONGO 08:59, 23 November 2005 (UTC)

RfA thanks

I'd like to thank you for your support of my RfA. As I wrote, I was looking forward to feedback from the community, and I would like to let you know that you should please feel free to leave any further feedback for me you may have for me in the future at my Talk page. Given your reasoning, I suppose that I should try to avoid doing anything all that different from what I've already been doing. Thanks again. Jkelly 08:48, 25 November 2005 (UTC)

Congratulations!

I'm pleased to inform you that you are now an administrator. Please consider reading all the material on the administrators' reading list before testing out your new privileges. Though everything you do, excluding image deletions and page history merges, is reversible, you should nevertheless be very careful with your sysop capabilities. For instructions, please see the administrators' how-to guide. Good luck! — Dan | Talk 15:55, 25 November 2005 (UTC)

Electrical engineering

Hi Mark,

Thanks for your observation on the contradictory nature of the electrical engineering article's lead.

I have changeed the artcle's lead so that I believe your concern is addressed and removed the tag.

Please take a look at the revised article here and advise me if you are happy with the changes at User talk:Cedars.

Thank you,

Cedars 05:49, 26 November 2005 (UTC)

Sean Black RfA

Thank you very much for your support of my RfA. Thanks, in part, to you, I am now an Administrator, and I pledge to use my newfound powers for good rather than evil. Thanks again!--Sean|Black 07:48, 26 November 2005 (UTC)

Congrats

Congrats on hitting a century in your recent RFA! I unfortunately missed the party. Join wikiproject cricket to celebrate your adminship. ;) =Nichalp «Talk»= 08:45, 26 November 2005 (UTC)

Cruft

Cruft is an unpleasant redundant thing. Yes, I'm happy with the phrase and think it accurate and succint. --Tagishsimon (talk).

Date format

Mark, regardless of whether you think it should be YYYY-MM-DD or M D Y or whatever, the wikilinks are to the year as separate from the day of the month.

Therefore, your edit on Julia Winter was worthless; no article exists for ], nor will one. Please bear this in mind. DS 16:51, 27 November 2005 (UTC) well, don't I feel like a twit.

Thankx!

Thank you Mark for removing the tag on Daco-romanian page. This Mikka has only bias edits related to Romania, Moldovan language, Daco-romanian, Daco-romanian language and so on...--Bonaparte 19:39, 27 November 2005 (UTC)

Mark, I strongly object you removal of the tag without looking into the matter. This guy persistently deletes the contents of the article. And I don't have any edits, only reversal this guy's political crusade. mikka (t) 19:44, 27 November 2005 (UTC)

No is not true! He makes bias edits! At that page today was also User:Bogdangiusca and what he supports is false. Daco romanian means romanian. Look at the page of romanian language for yourself! He persistently deletes, removes parts of the text take a look yourself at Talk:Moldovan language!--Bonaparte 19:56, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
Ok please have my deepest respect! I would like to thank you one more time!--Bonaparte 20:03, 27 November 2005 (UTC)

Note one closing admin's talk page

Fudd -
Very nicely done. I think that I am going to make you my new role model, now that my role model is gone.
brenneman 23:32, 27 November 2005 (UTC)

User:Malcholm

Hi fuddlemark

Congrats on your adminship! This is regarding User:Malcholm. He has been vandalising Ieroklis Stoltidis and Image:Stoltidis6.jpg. I have dealt with those, but there is an image that he uploaded to use on the Stoltidis article, and this seems to be a copyvio. Can you do something about it? Thanks -Aabha (talk) 15:15, 28 November 2005 (UTC)

I see

That you are doing protections now. :) If you ever feel an urge, we can always use help at WP:RfP. Right now it's just me, katefan0 and dmcdevit. We only get a few requests a day but any help there or at WP:PP would be welcome. --Woohookitty 21:10, 28 November 2005 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Timeline of Motorized bicycle history

Um, wouldn't it have been much easier to say No consensus to do anything? :) Titoxd 05:26, 29 November 2005 (UTC)

Second paragraph - good. First paragraph - uncivil, and unfudd-like.
While I admit that putting that those two link at the top with (NPOV) was a bit stupid provocative and probably deserved some comment... well that was a bit strong.
brenneman 05:38, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
On the other hand, I liked the first paragraph a lot, and the second was right on the money. My bad, and I acknowledge it - I let my overwhelming irritation with Pat get the better of me. Actually not with Pat per se, but with his repeated attempts to dilute the article with trivia, and if he can't do that, to keep creating new articles until eventually there is one which has a sufficiently low threshold to get his pet trivia in. Woohookitty gave up on him, I just got pissed off. Mind you, I don't think it was me who started the "summary" article, although it might have been I suppose. That's not the kind of thing I'd normally do. - Just zis  Guy, you know? / (W) AfD? 10:38, 29 November 2005 (UTC)

re:Malchom's picture

Is it just me, or is it actually besides the point to discuss whether the picture is doctored or not? I don't quite believe this is a space for that. (Even if it is doctored, this is probably the real aim behind it - publicity.) The debate really is about its copyright status, and whether we need it to be on Misplaced Pages at all. Please correct me if I'm wrong. Aabha (talk) 16:18, 29 November 2005 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for reverting that vandalism to my user page! Peace, delldot | talk 16:22, 29 November 2005 (UTC)

Your recent speedy delete on AfD

It looks like you speedied 4 or 5 items inside a single set of at/ab templates. Is that what you intended? --RoySmith 18:53, 29 November 2005 (UTC)