Revision as of 20:00, 14 June 2009 editMoonriddengirl (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators135,072 edits OTRS; co-licensed under GFDL and CC-BY-SA← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:59, 14 June 2009 edit undoDamiens.rf (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users23,536 edits →SourcesNext edit → | ||
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
I noted that this was nominated for deletion before, on the basis of lack of notability. It's strange how the deletion discussion evolved, coming to a ''keep'' without addressing the lack of notability. But that's another discussion. --] 14:30, 19 May 2009 (UTC) | I noted that this was nominated for deletion before, on the basis of lack of notability. It's strange how the deletion discussion evolved, coming to a ''keep'' without addressing the lack of notability. But that's another discussion. --] 14:30, 19 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
:Since nothing has been done to fix this problem, I've tagged some of the unverifiable claims in the article with {{tl|fact}}. --] 20:59, 14 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
== Photo == | == Photo == |
Revision as of 20:59, 14 June 2009
United States: Mississippi Unassessed | |||||||||||||
|
LGBTQ+ studies B‑class | |||||||
|
The following Misplaced Pages contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
This template should only be used on file (image) pages. For other permissions, please use {{Ticket confirmation}}.
NPOV
Well, I guess in a few minutes all the friends of the main editor will be here, and will threaten me with blocking and assusse me of being a gayhater. But nevertheless, how this section that is only supported by documents of one side of the dispute can be neutral is beyond me. The section only represents the viewpoint of one side, and completely neglects the POV of the other side. Surely if these conclicts are notable there must be some reporting in neutral sources, ie newspapers. Oh well, now I must be a gayhater and a vandal. 91.0.105.78 (talk) 13:11, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
- It does not contain any criticism because a Google News search of "Equality Mississippi" yields no results. EJNOGARB 22:15, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
- Depends on which Google News search you use. This Google News search yields at least 39 hits. - ℅ ✰ALLST☆R✰ 22:34, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
Mississippi Map
I propose that the map below the organization's logo be removed, since it's superfluous. Opinions? EJNOGARB 22:17, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
- I disagree. The article is about an organization, albeit a defunct one, in Mississippi. The map points out to foreign users where Mississippi is. - ℅ ✰ALLST☆R✰ 22:33, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
- It's not an issue I'd be willing to push. Still, other Mississippi articles like Mississippi State University and, I imagine, any article that isn't principally geographic, do not contain a map. EJNOGARB 22:46, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
- True, others don't have it. But no harm, no foul, no policy against. :] - ℅ ✰ALLST☆R✰ 23:00, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
- It's not an issue I'd be willing to push. Still, other Mississippi articles like Mississippi State University and, I imagine, any article that isn't principally geographic, do not contain a map. EJNOGARB 22:46, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
Sources
Hello. This article recently came to my attention. I've tagged it as needing sources, since most of Founding and Notable events sections seem to be based only on the author's experience. Since I have no reason to doubt it's veracity, I've tried to find sources for that information on the net. For my disappointment, I couldn't fin non-trivial mentions of this organizaton on google.
I noted that this was nominated for deletion before, on the basis of lack of notability. It's strange how the deletion discussion evolved, coming to a keep without addressing the lack of notability. But that's another discussion. --Damiens.rf 14:30, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Since nothing has been done to fix this problem, I've tagged some of the unverifiable claims in the article with {{fact}}. --Damiens.rf 20:59, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
Photo
I've replaced File:Gay rights marcher in Jackson Mississippi.jpg with File:Prop 8 gay rights rally in Jackson Mississippi.jpg in the article, since the former image is of low quality and currently subject to a deletion request on Commons. However, I'd like to note that I'm not aware of any direct evidence of Equality Mississippi being involved in either of the depicted protest events (though it's quite plausible that they were). Thus, it would be better to find a photo showing something indisputably connected with the organization. Alas, the fact that the organization is defunct and that their website seem to have disappeared almost without a trace (see, that's why you shouldn't block ia_archiver) may make this somewhat difficult. —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 22:35, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
Categories:- Unassessed United States articles
- Unknown-importance United States articles
- Unassessed United States articles of Unknown-importance
- Unassessed Mississippi articles
- Unknown-importance Mississippi articles
- WikiProject Mississippi articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- B-Class LGBTQ+ studies articles
- WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies articles
- Articles edited by connected contributors