Misplaced Pages

User talk:M i k e y 86: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 00:10, 23 June 2009 editMvjs (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers5,355 edits →Melbourne Airport: re← Previous edit Revision as of 21:46, 23 June 2009 edit undoBackslash Forwardslash (talk | contribs)20,602 edits Warning: Potentially violating the three revert rule on Melbourne Airport. (TW)Next edit →
Line 53: Line 53:
:The Avalon Airport section is not need on the melbourne airport page, it is doubling up information. Leave the information to AVV wikipage where it is meant to be thanks.{{unsigned|M i k e y 86}} :The Avalon Airport section is not need on the melbourne airport page, it is doubling up information. Leave the information to AVV wikipage where it is meant to be thanks.{{unsigned|M i k e y 86}}
::There is nothing wrong with the section on Avalon Airport. It provides a synopsis of Avalon's relationship with Melbourne Airport and the impacts it has. Readers are directed to the main article on Avalon Airport for further information specifically on the airport. The same situation exists on Sydney Airport's page. There is a small section on the proposed Sydney Airport and its potential consequences on Kingsford Smith. Readers are directed to a more in depth article on the proposed airport. Continually blanking this section without discussion on the talk page is unconstructive and is considered vandalism. You ] or face potential blocking of your editing privileges. <strong><font style="color: #082567">]</font><font style="color: #000000">]</font></strong> 00:10, 23 June 2009 (UTC) ::There is nothing wrong with the section on Avalon Airport. It provides a synopsis of Avalon's relationship with Melbourne Airport and the impacts it has. Readers are directed to the main article on Avalon Airport for further information specifically on the airport. The same situation exists on Sydney Airport's page. There is a small section on the proposed Sydney Airport and its potential consequences on Kingsford Smith. Readers are directed to a more in depth article on the proposed airport. Continually blanking this section without discussion on the talk page is unconstructive and is considered vandalism. You ] or face potential blocking of your editing privileges. <strong><font style="color: #082567">]</font><font style="color: #000000">]</font></strong> 00:10, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

== June 2009 ==
] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]{{#if:Melbourne Airport|&#32; according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, '''you may be ] from editing'''. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. If necessary, pursue ]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> \ ] / {]} 21:46, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:46, 23 June 2009

Welcome!

Hello, M i k e y 86, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  --Arnzy 11:56, 18 May 2006 (UTC)


Thank you for experimenting with Misplaced Pages. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. DXRAW 02:08, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Coles Supermarkets

Thanks for experimenting with Misplaced Pages. Your test of deliberately adding incorrect information worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. DXRAW 07:55, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Your edits to Brisbane Transport

Hello there, I guess this needs to be done from quite early on.

About the route numbering, I don't seem to see anything from Brisbane City Council site, but it is mentioned in TransLink website. Please provide proper reference when you change next time, thanks. matt-(my page-leave me a message) 09:52, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:130 3037.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:130 3037.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Misplaced Pages's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Misplaced Pages:Media copyright questions. 15:04, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

Air Pacific

See the comments I have posted on the talk page. Hopefully your table now still appears centred, however all of the text beneath the table will now be left justified. When you centre a table, you have to remember to insert the "turn off centre" command to turn off the centring once the table is finished. Regards--Calabraxthis 06:34, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Brisbane

Please do not remove content without consensus or reason, as you did in Brisbane. aliasd·U·T 18:18, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Dubai Control Tower.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Dubai Control Tower.jpg. Misplaced Pages gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Misplaced Pages, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Misplaced Pages:Media copyright questions. 15:07, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

Emirates Airline

The source you gave for that flight, http://www.gulfnews.com/business/Aviation/10204217.html, says it started 26 October 2008. It's not my job to look through www.emirates.com to find the information. You are adding the claim so it's up to you to source it correctly. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 13:38, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

Melbourne Airport

Hi Mikey. Avalon Airport is very relevant to Melbourne Airport–it has complemented and influenced it in its last six years of operations. The airport draws passengers from Melbourne Airport and has seen routes swapped between the two airports. Please do not continue to blank sections of Melbourne Airport without discussing it on the talk page, such actions are unconstructive. Thanks! MvjsTalking 21:57, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

The Avalon Airport section is not need on the melbourne airport page, it is doubling up information. Leave the information to AVV wikipage where it is meant to be thanks.— Preceding unsigned comment added by M i k e y 86 (talk • contribs)
There is nothing wrong with the section on Avalon Airport. It provides a synopsis of Avalon's relationship with Melbourne Airport and the impacts it has. Readers are directed to the main article on Avalon Airport for further information specifically on the airport. The same situation exists on Sydney Airport's page. There is a small section on the proposed Sydney Airport and its potential consequences on Kingsford Smith. Readers are directed to a more in depth article on the proposed airport. Continually blanking this section without discussion on the talk page is unconstructive and is considered vandalism. You may not make three reverts on any one page within a 24 hour period or face potential blocking of your editing privileges. MvjsTalking 00:10, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

June 2009

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Melbourne Airport. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. \ Backslash Forwardslash / {talk} 21:46, 23 June 2009 (UTC)