Revision as of 18:42, 28 June 2009 editGogo Dodo (talk | contribs)Administrators197,922 edits →Topology - expansion material: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:56, 28 June 2009 edit undoGogo Dodo (talk | contribs)Administrators197,922 edits →Topology - expansion material: ReplyNext edit → | ||
Line 139: | Line 139: | ||
The article got tagged for deletion. I suspect that you meant to create the article in your user space, so I moved it to ]. -- ] (]) 18:42, 28 June 2009 (UTC) | The article got tagged for deletion. I suspect that you meant to create the article in your user space, so I moved it to ]. -- ] (]) 18:42, 28 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
:Re : Yes. =) Well, okay, not really... When I delete articles, I usually check the contribution history of the editor who created the article. The note about David Eppstein, whom I recognize, also made me pause so I looked into it further. Your most recent contributions were to subpages with the ] prefix, so I took a look at it and located the article entry towards the bottom and guessed your naming convention. I was going to fix the link for you, but I figured that I would leave that up to you (I generally don't like editing other editor's user space pages). -- ] (]) 18:56, 28 June 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:56, 28 June 2009
SpinningSpark is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.This is especially true during the early part of the working week from Monday mornings (UTC) onwards |
Archives |
Why did you undo my edit of http://en.wikipedia.org/Ohms_law ?
I thought the link was perfectly valid. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.83.95.18 (talk) 03:20, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
- It adds nothing other than a calculator for a trivially simple calculation that could be done on, well, a calcualtor. See WP:ELNO especially , point 1 does not provide a unique resource beyond what the article would contain if it became a Featured article plus it is carrying adverts and has a page selling products which is putting it in the points 4 and 5 direction as well (although I might tolerate this if it was a genuinely unique resource). The default position is always not to put in external links, they should only be used where it is impossible to include the information in our own article; for instance a link in an art article to an image of a work of art which we cannot include for copyright reasons. SpinningSpark 09:47, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
fair enough —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.96.32.67 (talk) 19:48, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
Hello, and thank you
Just wanted to say hello, and thank you for responding to my question! Jasonaltenburg (talk) 15:26, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
- You're most welcome. Just ask if you need to know anything else. SpinningSpark 15:32, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
IRC channel
I am Spinningspark on IRC. SpinningSpark 19:26, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
Zobel network
I've uploaded some new images. There's a slightly childish chunkiness about them, but I think they're a lot clearer and more consistent than my previous versions. Thanks for the help; further constructive criticism welcome. Certes (talk) 11:13, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
- You may be interested in the discussion I've just noticed at Misplaced Pages:Graphic_Lab/Image_workshop#Clearing_the_circuit_backlog. Certes (talk) 12:34, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
Please do you still have the original numbers or formulae that went into File:Zobel (10) Response plot.PNG or File:Bode response.png? Using them directly in an SVG would be more accurate than reading them off the PNG with a hair cursor, as well as much less effort. I should be able to reconstruct File:Video_line_response.png myself, assuming it's theoretical rather than experimental data and ω is on a logarithmic scale in all three images. Certes (talk) 13:42, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
- First draft at File:Zobel (10) Response plot.svg; comments welcome. (Would a blue background make the yellow more visible?) I'll not put this into the article yet as it would look odd alongside your more traditional plots. Do you think it should be moved further up into Zobel network#High pass? Certes (talk) 00:44, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
The Barnstar of Shame
Hey, just wanted to complement you on this. I certainly got a kick out of it. ;) -T'Shael, Lord of the Vulcans 23:12, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
- Maybe we should make a template if you can think of a few more who deserve it. SpinningSpark 23:16, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
- I can only think of one other deserving of such a barn star, but I'm sure that there are more out there. -T'Shael, Lord of the Vulcans 00:24, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
Thankyou very much. Asking for barnstars does work though, I've got nine (although I probably shouldn't have all of them). I'm sure User:ScribbleStick would be deserving of that Barnstar, if that's who you had in mind. Spongefrog (talk) 10:42, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
I've got another one. User:Bugboy52.40 made this userbox
Userboxes | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||||
Spongefrog (talk) 10:59, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
Forgot about those. Hehe. Six or Seven then. I'll give Scribblestick a shame barnstar now. Spongefrog (talk) 11:11, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
File:Zobel (14) Balanced Bridge T.PNG listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Zobel (14) Balanced Bridge T.PNG, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. The New Mikemoral ♪♫ 00:53, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
File:Zobel (15) Balanced Zobel half section.PNG listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Zobel (15) Balanced Zobel half section.PNG, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. The New Mikemoral ♪♫ 00:57, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for your welcoming
Hi. I have a ro.wikipedia.org Doru001 account. Can it/should it be merged with this one? Doru001 (talk) 07:57, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
Thanks again. Doru001 (talk) 18:09, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
Talkback
Hello, Spinningspark. You have new messages at Misplaced Pages:Files for deletion/2009 June 17.You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
I do apologize for my mistakes; I did not see the {{KeepLocal}} and I would suggest placing those in a more visible location. The New Mikemoral ♪♫ 21:46, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
- Once more. --The New Mikemoral ♪♫ 23:28, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
Why did you undo my edit of http://en.wikipedia.org/Ohms_law (2nd Part)?
Hi, SppinningSpark. I'd like you to review the editing of my addition, or at least explain me the reasons why you discarded it. And yes, I've read your justifications in the earlier item. I think that discarding it for being only a calculator is a weak interpretation of its purpose, because this application automatically guesses the unknown value as you type (which none of the others “calculators“ published in external links do). Thus it's useful for verification of the knowledge acquired for anyone in an electronics oriented high school. There is no use for me to hide the fact that I made (programmed) this web app by myself and I see it with subjective eyes, but despite of this I made it thinking that there was a lack in the internet for this kind of apps and that I would love to have anything like when I was studying. The advertising in it, in my opinion, does not disqualify it as a useful addition for students and doesn't make it a spammer page (does not intend to sell a product) and the intention (mine) is not to promote it but to increase the posibilities of Misplaced Pages. Thanks for your time, and I hope my message to you is transmitted as friendly as it really is, in spite of my bad English. Thanks again, Elpiades (talk) 21:11, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
- Hi Elpiades, before I answer you, a couple of points about Misplaced Pages conventions. Firstly, new posts go to the bottom of talk pages which is why I have moved yours down here. Secondly, discussion of article content should go on the article talk page where all the regular editors of that page can take part - even if you could manage to convince me you were right, some other editor may still delete you if the debate is not made visisble to them and they get a chance to take part.
- My reasons for removing your link are to be found in the External links guidelines which you should read before going any further. Your link does not seem to be covered by anything in the What to link section and falls foul of several sections of Links normally to be avoided including particularly WP:EL#EL8.
- The purpose of advertisements is always to sell something. If you have "Ads by Google" on your site, your site is selling, even if that is not its primary function. That does not entirely rule out a site for inclusion, but it should have at least one of the positive requirements listed and none of the other negative ones.
- You say you want to increase the possibilities of Misplaced Pages. This is done by adding to our articles and making them better, not by directing our readers to somebody elses site. If you really want to contribute to Misplaced Pages, I suggest you add something to our articles other than links. SpinningSpark 21:55, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
- Hello SpinningSpark, first of all I sincerely want to thank you for guiding me through Misplaced Pages conventions. I'm new here and I knew I couldn't avoid some mistakes in my first steps. This will be my last words about the subject in your talk page and if I convince you (hope I do) I'll begin my writing only at the article, otherwise I will desist.
- Before I posted the link, I carefully read the External links guidelines and found no disagreement with my actions. I will paste the relevant points and discuss them:
- In What to link
- Is the site content accessible to the reader? Certainly is, no password or registration required to use it.
- Is the site content proper in the context of the article (useful, tasteful, informative, factual, etc.)? Just as useful as any specific-purpose calculator, not less useful than the elder java calculator already linked.
- Is the link functional and likely to remain functional? You have to trust me on this, yes.
- In Links normally to be avoided
- Links mainly intended to promote a website. See External link spamming. Not applicable, the site does not qualify as spammer, I will not paste it, just get into it if you're unsure.
- Links to web pages that primarily exist to sell products or services, or to web pages with objectionable amounts of advertising. Not applicable, you have to agree that its primary purpose is not to sell products or services, just as Misplaced Pages's primary purpose is not to collect money from users, but to deliver information; and if you visit the page you'll notice that it only has one banner of advertising in it. Surely not objectionable amount of ads, it's only my hope to pay the site's own hosting.
- Direct links to documents that require external applications (such as Flash or Java) It's a common mistake to confuse Java (downloable plugin and external application) with JavaScript (running in every modern browser without needing to install anything else). Pythia does not require an external application; the already listed external calculator does, so this point is not applicable.
- I agree with what you said about embeding it in the article itself and not forcing the reader to follow an external link, but the dynamic nature of this page is technically impossible to do it. Misplaced Pages does not accept scripting inside of an article.
- I'm starting to bore myself with my own arguments (I hope you aren't), but I think I made my point. Thanks again and good luck!
Elpiades (talk) 05:46, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
If you can find the time..
Would you help me out, and chop off the top of the photos in the infoboxes for Mick Taylor and Tim Reynolds? (Well, you know, trim the photos, but, when you see, it should be a simple slice from what you've told me). Wish I were allowed to do such things from this computer! If you're busy, then, that's OK too! --leahtwosaints (talk) 00:32, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
- I forgot. Damn, I hate that. There are photos of Peter Gabriel in his wild costumes from the earliest days with Genesis. I uploaded them. Can you cut these too?
- The Watcher of the Skies
- The Moonlit Knight], and one placed already, . Hopefully, I'll find another person to help with these menial tasks, or WIN a computer (not likely) soon. Hugs. --leahtwosaints (talk) 23:05, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
Appreciation
I just want you to know, I appreciate our discussion on the help talk:reverting page. I very much appreciate your perspective and input. Thank you(Smallvillefanatic (talk) 17:52, 21 June 2009 (UTC)).
Appreciation
Thanks for notifying me about the comments at Misplaced Pages:Editor assistance/Requests. It's the first time, to my knowledge, that anyone has ever brought me up on "charges". I hope I've not overdone it in my reply. Again, thanks. Unschool 18:00, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
- No, I don't think you have overdone it, and I smell troll. Don't worry about it, and don't feed it. SpinningSpark 18:11, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
Barnstar
The Graphic Designer's Barnstar | ||
Thank you for your input at the Graphic Lab, which helped clear up Category:Circuit images that should be in SVG format. We'll try to keep the categories low ;-) ZooFari 17:19, 22 June 2009 (UTC) |
Questions
- I know you aren't fond of music articles, but Crowded House is a GA ranked article, but is such a sorry mess, I don't know who to tell to have it re-examined.
- Another editor has been making clips for my two pet projects, Cat Stevens (GA) and Derek Trucks (start). Do you know, or to whom may I ask about the requisite justification forms re: the sound bites being copyright snips and (shrunken) album images? I hate to ask but..? Thanks Sparkly. --leahtwosaints (talk) 00:20, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
Topology - expansion material
The article got tagged for deletion. I suspect that you meant to create the article in your user space, so I moved it to User:Spinningspark/Work in progress/Topology - expansion material. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:42, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
- Re your message: Yes. =) Well, okay, not really... When I delete articles, I usually check the contribution history of the editor who created the article. The note about David Eppstein, whom I recognize, also made me pause so I looked into it further. Your most recent contributions were to subpages with the User:Spinningspark/Work in progress prefix, so I took a look at it and located the article entry towards the bottom and guessed your naming convention. I was going to fix the link for you, but I figured that I would leave that up to you (I generally don't like editing other editor's user space pages). -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:56, 28 June 2009 (UTC)