| Revision as of 21:13, 25 June 2009 editJuliancolton (talk | contribs)Administrators130,415 edits →Discussion: will do← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:14, 29 June 2009 edit undoQuadell (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users107,341 edits okNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <noinclude>]</noinclude> | <noinclude>]</noinclude><div class="boilerplate metadata" style="background-color: | ||
| #A0FFA0; margin:2em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |||
| :''The following discussion is an archived debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.'' The result of the discussion was ] '''Approved'''.<!-- from Template:Bot Top--> | |||
| <noinclude>]</noinclude> | |||
| ==]== | ==]== | ||
| {{Newbot|JCbot}} | {{Newbot|JCbot}} | ||
| Line 40: | Line 43: | ||
| ::Small suggestion: even though ] wrote the newsletter, it might be a good idea to mention at the bottom of the edit that the newsletter was delivered by a bot, just so users know that it wasn't specifically The Transhumanist who left the message. An example is, "<small>''Newsletter delivered by {{user|JCbot}} at 21:05, 25 June 2009 (UTC).''</small>" ] <span style="font-family:Verdana"><small>(] | ])</small></span> 21:05, 25 June 2009 (UTC) | ::Small suggestion: even though ] wrote the newsletter, it might be a good idea to mention at the bottom of the edit that the newsletter was delivered by a bot, just so users know that it wasn't specifically The Transhumanist who left the message. An example is, "<small>''Newsletter delivered by {{user|JCbot}} at 21:05, 25 June 2009 (UTC).''</small>" ] <span style="font-family:Verdana"><small>(] | ])</small></span> 21:05, 25 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
| :::Alright, will do next time around. Thanks for the suggestion. –''']''' | ] 21:13, 25 June 2009 (UTC) | :::Alright, will do next time around. Thanks for the suggestion. –''']''' | ] 21:13, 25 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
| {{BotApproved}} Looks good. – ] <sup>(])</sup> 18:14, 29 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.''<!-- from Template:Bot Bottom --></div> | |||
Revision as of 18:14, 29 June 2009
- The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. The result of the discussion was
Approved.
JCbot
Operator: Juliancolton
Automatic or Manually assisted: Automatic, supervised
Programming language(s): AWB
Function overview: Will deliver newsletters and/or project notices for WP:WPOOK.
Edit period(s): Once every week or so.
Estimated number of pages affected: 50–a couple hundred.
Already has a bot flag (Y/N): No.
Function details: Pretty straightforward delivery of a WikiProject newsletter.
Discussion
Just out of curiosity, is there a reason why you need to run this bot yourself? I think that it might be easier (faster, and less work for you) to contact the operator of one of these bots, who'd probably be very willing to do a task for you. The Earwig (Talk | Contribs) 01:10, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
- Not sure, to be honest. :) The Transhumanist (talk · contribs) requested it, and I trust he had a good reason for doing so. I'll ask him to comment. –Juliancolton | 01:25, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
- This is just the first of many chores the bot will do, though I'd like the bot approved to serve other WikiProjects upon request as well. I coordinate more than one WikiProject, with more likely. I thought it would be best to get started with a simple low volume periodic task, to provide experience in running a bot. Once Julian has sent some newsletters, we'll submit new tasks for approval. WP:WPOOK's main bot operator (Thehelpfulone) won't be as available to help in the foreseeable future. The Transhumanist 01:56, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
Approved for trial (1 days). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. Okay, let's deliver a day's worth of newsletters. – Quadell 12:52, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
Y - Small suggestion: even though The Transhumanist wrote the newsletter, it might be a good idea to mention at the bottom of the edit that the newsletter was delivered by a bot, just so users know that it wasn't specifically The Transhumanist who left the message. An example is, "Newsletter delivered by JCbot (talk · contribs) at 21:05, 25 June 2009 (UTC)." The Earwig (Talk | Contribs) 21:05, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
- Alright, will do next time around. Thanks for the suggestion. –Juliancolton | 21:13, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
- Small suggestion: even though The Transhumanist wrote the newsletter, it might be a good idea to mention at the bottom of the edit that the newsletter was delivered by a bot, just so users know that it wasn't specifically The Transhumanist who left the message. An example is, "Newsletter delivered by JCbot (talk · contribs) at 21:05, 25 June 2009 (UTC)." The Earwig (Talk | Contribs) 21:05, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
Approved. Looks good. – Quadell 18:14, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.