Misplaced Pages

User talk:Garion96/Archive 17: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< User talk:Garion96 Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:24, 4 July 2009 editGarion96 (talk | contribs)Administrators52,264 editsm fix← Previous edit Revision as of 09:47, 5 July 2009 edit undoWildhartlivie (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers55,910 edits →Mickey Rourke: new sectionNext edit →
Line 20: Line 20:
{{talkback|I dream of horses|Ad-Libs Improvisational Comedy Theater}} {{talkback|I dream of horses|Ad-Libs Improvisational Comedy Theater}}
] (]) 21:22, 4 July 2009 (UTC) ] (]) 21:22, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

== Mickey Rourke ==

Without going into too much detail which you can probably pick up on , I'd actually have left the lead tag and addressed . We don't leave summaries of a filmography in the main actor article, the career is the summary for the table, or at least that's how I see it. Without digging too deeply because I'm very familiar with the layout, etc., on most featured articles for ], ], ], and ] are all examples of FAs that have filmographies on separate pages and none of them have a summary of the filmography for these very reasons. If I removed that tag, it would start something I don't want to get started. Let me know what you think. Thanks. ] (]) 09:47, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 09:47, 5 July 2009

Archives

Reply:Bitting the Newcomers?=

I left this on that user's page in reply.Regards, SchnitzelMannGreek. 00:23, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

FYI

Biography articles should not be cluttered with long lists of red-linked credits. Also, do not revert corrections that improve articles so they meet Misplaced Pages standards. 209.247.22.164 (talk) 16:52, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

There is no guideline to say they shouldn't, see also Misplaced Pages:Red link. Maybe some of these links don't deserve an article, but then the links should be removed. To remove the whole filmography from a director is just wrong. Garion96 (talk) 18:23, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Red link clearly states, "Do not create red links to articles that will never be created," so please stop red linking the titles of obscure foreign films. Also, please stop reverting correct formats and proper capitalization and grammar as you keep doing at Michael Kehlmann. 209.247.22.164 (talk) 15:43, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Garion96. You have new messages at I dream of horses's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I dream of horses (talk) 21:16, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

Hello, Garion96. You have new messages at I dream of horses's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I dream of horses (talk) 21:22, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

Mickey Rourke

Without going into too much detail which you can probably pick up on elsewhere, I'd actually have left the lead tag and addressed this one. We don't leave summaries of a filmography in the main actor article, the career is the summary for the table, or at least that's how I see it. Without digging too deeply because I'm very familiar with the layout, etc., on most featured articles for WP:ACTOR, Bette Davis, Vivien Leigh, and Judy Garland are all examples of FAs that have filmographies on separate pages and none of them have a summary of the filmography for these very reasons. If I removed that tag, it would start something I don't want to get started. Let me know what you think. Thanks. Wildhartlivie (talk) 09:47, 5 July 2009 (UTC)