| Revision as of 09:47, 5 July 2009 editWildhartlivie (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers55,910 edits →Mickey Rourke: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 10:27, 5 July 2009 edit undoViriditas (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers169,112 edits →Mickey Rourke: +Next edit → | ||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
| Without going into too much detail which you can probably pick up on , I'd actually have left the lead tag and addressed . We don't leave summaries of a filmography in the main actor article, the career is the summary for the table, or at least that's how I see it. Without digging too deeply because I'm very familiar with the layout, etc., on most featured articles for ], ], ], and ] are all examples of FAs that have filmographies on separate pages and none of them have a summary of the filmography for these very reasons. If I removed that tag, it would start something I don't want to get started. Let me know what you think. Thanks. ] (]) 09:47, 5 July 2009 (UTC) | Without going into too much detail which you can probably pick up on , I'd actually have left the lead tag and addressed . We don't leave summaries of a filmography in the main actor article, the career is the summary for the table, or at least that's how I see it. Without digging too deeply because I'm very familiar with the layout, etc., on most featured articles for ], ], ], and ] are all examples of FAs that have filmographies on separate pages and none of them have a summary of the filmography for these very reasons. If I removed that tag, it would start something I don't want to get started. Let me know what you think. Thanks. ] (]) 09:47, 5 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
| :Exactly, the FA's in question all contain tables in the main article. Rourke's filmography was split out without leaving the table, hence the tag. Oh, and for what it's worth, Wildhartlivie, I've been editing film and actor-related articles for at least two years before you joined Misplaced Pages. And, that includes Mickey Rourke and Kevin Spacey, two articles ''you'' recently followed me to. ] (]) 10:27, 5 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Re: Mickey Rourke == | |||
| {{Talkback|Talk:Mickey Rourke|Lead section}} ] (]) 10:19, 5 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 10:27, 5 July 2009
| |
| Archives |
Reply:Bitting the Newcomers?=
I left this on that user's page in reply.Regards, SchnitzelMannGreek. 00:23, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
FYI
Biography articles should not be cluttered with long lists of red-linked credits. Also, do not revert corrections that improve articles so they meet Misplaced Pages standards. 209.247.22.164 (talk) 16:52, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
- There is no guideline to say they shouldn't, see also Misplaced Pages:Red link. Maybe some of these links don't deserve an article, but then the links should be removed. To remove the whole filmography from a director is just wrong. Garion96 (talk) 18:23, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
- Misplaced Pages:Red link clearly states, "Do not create red links to articles that will never be created," so please stop red linking the titles of obscure foreign films. Also, please stop reverting correct formats and proper capitalization and grammar as you keep doing at Michael Kehlmann. 209.247.22.164 (talk) 15:43, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
Talkback
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
I dream of horses (talk) 21:16, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
I dream of horses (talk) 21:22, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
Mickey Rourke
Without going into too much detail which you can probably pick up on elsewhere, I'd actually have left the lead tag and addressed this one. We don't leave summaries of a filmography in the main actor article, the career is the summary for the table, or at least that's how I see it. Without digging too deeply because I'm very familiar with the layout, etc., on most featured articles for WP:ACTOR, Bette Davis, Vivien Leigh, and Judy Garland are all examples of FAs that have filmographies on separate pages and none of them have a summary of the filmography for these very reasons. If I removed that tag, it would start something I don't want to get started. Let me know what you think. Thanks. Wildhartlivie (talk) 09:47, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
- Exactly, the FA's in question all contain tables in the main article. Rourke's filmography was split out without leaving the table, hence the tag. Oh, and for what it's worth, Wildhartlivie, I've been editing film and actor-related articles for at least two years before you joined Misplaced Pages. And, that includes Mickey Rourke and Kevin Spacey, two articles you recently followed me to. Viriditas (talk) 10:27, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
Re: Mickey Rourke
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.