Misplaced Pages

talk:WikiProject Greece: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 08:56, 3 July 2009 editCplakidas (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers221,796 edits Byzantine civil war of 1341–1347 peer review: new section← Previous edit Revision as of 16:43, 7 July 2009 edit undoMattisse (talk | contribs)78,542 edits FAR Names of the Greeks: new sectionNext edit →
Line 47: Line 47:


Hello! There is a ] of the ] going on over at WPMILHIST. Everyone is invited to give his opinion and supply criticism! Cheers, ] ] 08:56, 3 July 2009 (UTC) Hello! There is a ] of the ] going on over at WPMILHIST. Everyone is invited to give his opinion and supply criticism! Cheers, ] ] 08:56, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

== FAR ] ==

{{#if:|] has|I have}} nominated ] for a ]. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets ]. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are ]. Regards, —] (]) 16:43, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:43, 7 July 2009

Template:WikiProject talkheader Template:Outline of knowledge coverage WPT

Archiving icon
Archives


This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present.
Shortcuts

Macedonia (terminology) FAR

Macedonia (terminology) has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here.

Article alerts

This is a notice to let you know about Article alerts, a fully-automated subscription-based news delivery system designed to notify WikiProjects and Taskforces when articles are entering Articles for deletion, Requests for comment, Peer review and other workflows (full list). The reports are updated on a daily basis, and provide brief summaries of what happened, with relevant links to discussion or results when possible. A certain degree of customization is available; WikiProjects and Taskforces can choose which workflows to include, have individual reports generated for each workflow, have deletion discussion transcluded on the reports, and so on. An example of a customized report can be found here.

If you are already subscribed to Article Alerts, it is now easier to report bugs and request new features. We are also in the process of implementing a "news system", which would let projects know about ongoing discussions on a wikipedia-wide level, and other things of interest. The developers also note that some subscribing WikiProjects and Taskforces use the display=none parameter, but forget to give a link to their alert page. Your alert page should be located at "Misplaced Pages:PROJECT-OR-TASKFORCE-HOMEPAGE/Article alerts". Questions and feedback should be left at Misplaced Pages talk:Article alerts.

Message sent by User:Addbot to all active wiki projects per request, Comments on the message and bot are welcome here.

Thanks. — Headbomb {κοντριβς – WP Physics} 09:12, 15 March, 2009 (UTC)

Sophocles GAR notice

Sophocles has been nominated for a good article reassessment. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to good article quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. Reviewers' concerns are here.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 23:43, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Andreas Savvides - help needed with greek language sources.

Hi, I hoping someone from this project can help a new user. I've recently been looking at a new article on Andreas Savvides, apparently an athlete/commando/scientist from Cyprus. The material is detailed, but the claims are quite bold. The contributor, Charls Andre, has offered to send in scans of the newspaper articles he used to source this, so I'd like to assume good faith. Would someone be able to assist him (or perhaps comfirm that it is a hoax - it is currently up for PROD) Marasmusine (talk) 08:25, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

It looks like a hoax. I've never heard of the guy and a Google search in Greek reveals nothing.--Damac (talk) 14:07, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
If not a hoax, it seems to fail notability. But, indeed, there is much nonsensical information in the article. In any case, as I said to Charls, I am willing to review any sources he/she can provide via mail.--Yannismarou (talk) 17:45, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Greek love deletion, renaming or merge proposal

The article Greek love was found to have multiple problems. A proposal to delete the article was made and an IP editor came through and added two projects to the articles talk page, this project and Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome.

Please take a moment to weigh in on this discussion here. Thank you.--Amadscientist (talk) 19:44, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Byzantine civil war of 1341–1347 peer review

Hello! There is a peer review of the Byzantine civil war of 1341–1347 going on over at WPMILHIST. Everyone is invited to give his opinion and supply criticism! Cheers, Constantine 08:56, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

FAR Names of the Greeks

I have nominated Names of the Greeks for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Regards, —Mattisse (Talk) 16:43, 7 July 2009 (UTC)