| Revision as of 22:38, 11 April 2008 editJohnnyfog (talk | contribs)6,810 editsm →Re: Persona Revelations: typo← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:20, 10 July 2009 edit undoReyBrujo (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers40,722 edits →Re: NWC Large Images: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
| ::Ok, you can try that. You can link to the site, but please don't mention ebay in the article. A good place to stick the reference would be in the Reception section, maybe at the tail end of "although ''Persona'' was something of a sleeper hit"... ] 22:38, 11 April 2008 (UTC) | ::Ok, you can try that. You can link to the site, but please don't mention ebay in the article. A good place to stick the reference would be in the Reception section, maybe at the tail end of "although ''Persona'' was something of a sleeper hit"... ] 22:38, 11 April 2008 (UTC) | ||
| == Re: NWC Large Images == | |||
| Nice, thanks! I uploaded them in Commons, you can check them at ] and ]. You can edit the image descriptions at Commons directly if you want to modify some information from there too. We don't have that many opportunities for having free pictures for collectible items like those, so we thank you! -- ] (]) 18:20, 10 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:20, 10 July 2009
Re: Persona Revelations
"Listing a price in conjunction with critical analysis of the game or content from secondary sources, such as describing the general prices for games, or that the very low or very high cost of a game was a factor in the critical reception of the work, can be included."
Well to be honest, I don't your edit meets this requirement. My interpretation of the policy is:
The price can be included if it had any bearing on the game's reception at the time of its release.
For instance, if the price of the game was affordable/exorbitant, that might have affected its sales. This is hard to prove, so most articles just stick to the sales figures.
We're talking the bidding prices on sites like ebay, which makes including it even more sketchy. If you can find a precedent for something similar on another game article (preferably B-class or higher), I'll reconsider it. Johnnyfog 15:33, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
- Alright, good work.
- The article you picked is indeed a B article. If you want to check, just click on the discussion tab at the top. But I still have some reservations. Ogre Battle had extremely limited distribution. Practically no one has played it without an emulator. That's a worthy object of note, since it affected its reception.
- However, I doubt any editor would tolerate posting Persona's ebay bidding price. Once the game is out of store circulation, as far as wikipedia is concerned, its disappeared. If you want to bolster the argument that it has become a sleeper hit, what you need to do is link to magazines or websites which mention it. Usually all you need is one link. Johnnyfog 00:48, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
- Ok, you can try that. You can link to the site, but please don't mention ebay in the article. A good place to stick the reference would be in the Reception section, maybe at the tail end of "although Persona was something of a sleeper hit"... Johnnyfog 22:38, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
Re: NWC Large Images
Nice, thanks! I uploaded them in Commons, you can check them at File:1990 Nintendo World Championships Gray.jpg and File:1990 Nintendo World Championships Gold.jpg. You can edit the image descriptions at Commons directly if you want to modify some information from there too. We don't have that many opportunities for having free pictures for collectible items like those, so we thank you! -- ReyBrujo (talk) 18:20, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
