Misplaced Pages

talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Abd-William M. Connolley/Workshop: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration | Requests | Case | Abd-William M. Connolley Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 10:55, 19 July 2009 editMathsci (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers66,107 editsm Recently arrived user← Previous edit Revision as of 11:03, 19 July 2009 edit undoArkady Renkov (talk | contribs)88 edits Recently arrived user: Don't try to intimidate the other participantsNext edit →
Line 9: Line 9:


With only 70 edits to his name before today and no apparent experience with noticeboards/ArbCom, this recently arrived user shows complete familiarity with wikipedia jargon and processes. ] suggests that this might be a sockpuppet account. ] (]) 10:50, 19 July 2009 (UTC) With only 70 edits to his name before today and no apparent experience with noticeboards/ArbCom, this recently arrived user shows complete familiarity with wikipedia jargon and processes. ] suggests that this might be a sockpuppet account. ] (]) 10:50, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

:Or possibly a user who had previously used another name (*), or a user who mainly doesn't bother to log in or a user who lurks a lot or ... Just a reminder that ''sockpuppet'' is defined as "an alternative account used for fraudulent, disruptive, or otherwise deceptive purposes that violate or circumvent enforcement of Misplaced Pages policies". Would you like to say which of those you are accusing me of, or would you like to take your accusation to ] and back it up with evidence, or would you like to withdraw now before ArbComm sanctions you for trying to intimidate other participants in this case? ] (]) 11:03, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

::(*)The correct answer BTW ] (]) 11:03, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 11:03, 19 July 2009

Sorry for harsh remarks

I'm sorry that I wrote snide remarks and uncivil words. I'm afraid that the helpful comments were written long ago and I felt that they went ignored (this will be evident when I submit my evidence this weekend), and now my frustration with Abd is making me write very harsh messages. Unfortunately, arbs don't know the context and they won't understand what I am talking about, so I'll make a serious effort to be way more neutral and clear, and not use any sarcasm. I will be grateful that people leaves a note on my talk page when they see that I am making unhelpful comments. I won't comment more until I finish the evidence, so I can support my statements properly. --Enric Naval (talk) 14:59, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for your understanding and efforts, Enric. This is undoubtedly going to be a very heated case in any event, and the arbitrators and myself as case clerk would all very much appreciate everyone's commitment to keep careful watch on themselves and their comments. Should anyone notice that a comment has been made which does cross the line, please feel free to email me - I'm not as active during the week as I'd like due to work, but I will be sure to take a look and handle things as necessary as soon as I can. My talk page is similarly open, but if you feel you're being attacked, email may be a better option to reduce drama levels. Thanks again. Hersfold 21:39, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

Recently arrived user

With only 70 edits to his name before today and no apparent experience with noticeboards/ArbCom, this recently arrived user shows complete familiarity with wikipedia jargon and processes. WP:DUCK suggests that this might be a sockpuppet account. Mathsci (talk) 10:50, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

Or possibly a user who had previously used another name (*), or a user who mainly doesn't bother to log in or a user who lurks a lot or ... Just a reminder that sockpuppet is defined as "an alternative account used for fraudulent, disruptive, or otherwise deceptive purposes that violate or circumvent enforcement of Misplaced Pages policies". Would you like to say which of those you are accusing me of, or would you like to take your accusation to WP:SPI and back it up with evidence, or would you like to withdraw now before ArbComm sanctions you for trying to intimidate other participants in this case? Arkady Renkov (talk) 11:03, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
(*)The correct answer BTW Arkady Renkov (talk) 11:03, 19 July 2009 (UTC)