Revision as of 03:17, 7 December 2005 editChristianjb (talk | contribs)903 edits Response← Previous edit | Revision as of 10:37, 7 December 2005 edit undoChristianjb (talk | contribs)903 edits →AiG page.Next edit → | ||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
Remove it if you want, but state your reason on the talk page. Thanks ] 03:17, 7 December 2005 (UTC) | Remove it if you want, but state your reason on the talk page. Thanks ] 03:17, 7 December 2005 (UTC) | ||
== AiG page. == | |||
:At the moment there is no point of view in the article. There are just the exact quotes and a historical mention of the persecution of gays in the Holocaust. It's then written that "defenders would reject that the quotes are a reference to these events". All fairly NPOV in my opinion. Do you honestly doubt that homosexuals would (in general) find the neologisms homonazi and sodomofascist insulting? Also do you honestly doubt that part of the reason they might find it insulting is due to the history of persecution? | |||
:You said that you're a Pole whose relatives where actually persecuted. Well, homosexuals were actually persecuted as well. I'm not going to get into a debate about the relative degree of persecution- people of both communities were killed (for respectively ethic and gender reasons) and that seems all that's relevent ] 10:02, 7 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
(sorry for the delay in responding BTW) ] 10:02, 7 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
::Update- I have sent the following email to glbtjews.org | |||
<blockquote> Dear Sir/Madam, | |||
I've got some tough questions regarding an encyclopedia article I am helping to edit: | |||
http://en.wikipedia.org/Answers_in_Genesis | |||
This article in part covers a page by creationist organization "Answers in Genesis" in which the neologisms "homonazi" and "sodomofascist" are used. (http://www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/feedback/2005/0218.asp) | |||
These are the questions (and I'm sorry for putting them so bluntly). | |||
Would the neologisms "homonazi" and "sodomofascist" be offensive to most homosexuals? Would they be considered particularly offensive because of the documented persecution in the Holocaust? | |||
Could it be considered offensive for an encyclopedia article to point out the connection between these neologisms and the possible connection with the Holocaust? For instance, would the Jewish community in general feel that it diminishes their suffering for each group to claim they were persecuted- when it was one particular group, the Jews that suffered the worst destruction? | |||
Thanks in advance for any help you can provide. I personally consider the neologisms to be offensive, but as this has been the subject of some dispute with other editors I would like your input. | |||
I want to be accountable for this email, so my full address is: | |||
(removed) | |||
</blockquote> ] 10:37, 7 December 2005 (UTC) |
Revision as of 10:37, 7 December 2005
Welcome!
Welcome to Misplaced Pages, Agapetos angel! My name is Ryan, aka Acetic Acid. I noticed that you were new and haven't received any messages yet. I just wanted to see how you were doing. Misplaced Pages can be a little intimidating at first, since it uses different formatting than other sites that use HTML and CSS. In the long run, though, you'll find that the WikiSyntax is a lot easier and faster than those other ways. Here are a few links to get you started:
- How to edit a page
- Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
There are a lot of policies and guides to read, but I highly recommend reading over those first. If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. Please be sure to sign your name on Talk Pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, along with a link to your user page. This way, others know when you left a message and how to find you. It's easier than having to type out your name, right? :)
I hope you enjoy contributing to Misplaced Pages. We can use all the help we can get! Have a nice day. Sincerely, Ryan 01:12, August 5, 2005 (UTC)
Response
Remove it if you want, but state your reason on the talk page. Thanks Christianjb 03:17, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
AiG page.
- At the moment there is no point of view in the article. There are just the exact quotes and a historical mention of the persecution of gays in the Holocaust. It's then written that "defenders would reject that the quotes are a reference to these events". All fairly NPOV in my opinion. Do you honestly doubt that homosexuals would (in general) find the neologisms homonazi and sodomofascist insulting? Also do you honestly doubt that part of the reason they might find it insulting is due to the history of persecution?
- You said that you're a Pole whose relatives where actually persecuted. Well, homosexuals were actually persecuted as well. I'm not going to get into a debate about the relative degree of persecution- people of both communities were killed (for respectively ethic and gender reasons) and that seems all that's relevent Christianjb 10:02, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
(sorry for the delay in responding BTW) Christianjb 10:02, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
- Update- I have sent the following email to glbtjews.org
Dear Sir/Madam,
I've got some tough questions regarding an encyclopedia article I am helping to edit:
http://en.wikipedia.org/Answers_in_Genesis
This article in part covers a page by creationist organization "Answers in Genesis" in which the neologisms "homonazi" and "sodomofascist" are used. (http://www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/feedback/2005/0218.asp)
These are the questions (and I'm sorry for putting them so bluntly).
Would the neologisms "homonazi" and "sodomofascist" be offensive to most homosexuals? Would they be considered particularly offensive because of the documented persecution in the Holocaust?
Could it be considered offensive for an encyclopedia article to point out the connection between these neologisms and the possible connection with the Holocaust? For instance, would the Jewish community in general feel that it diminishes their suffering for each group to claim they were persecuted- when it was one particular group, the Jews that suffered the worst destruction?
Thanks in advance for any help you can provide. I personally consider the neologisms to be offensive, but as this has been the subject of some dispute with other editors I would like your input.
I want to be accountable for this email, so my full address is: (removed)