| Revision as of 16:09, 28 July 2009 editDomer48 (talk | contribs)16,098 edits Please read WP:3RR← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:36, 28 July 2009 edit undoBigDunc (talk | contribs)Rollbackers16,576 edits →3 RR: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| Please read ] as your edits while being disruptive could also been seen as edit warring. Please stop now. --] (]) 16:09, 28 July 2009 (UTC) | Please read ] as your edits while being disruptive could also been seen as edit warring. Please stop now. --] (]) 16:09, 28 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
| == 3 RR == | |||
| {{uw-3rr|Killings at Coolacrease}} <span style="border:1px solid green;padding:0px;">]</span> 17:36, 28 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:36, 28 July 2009
Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Killings at Coolacrease, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Misplaced Pages:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.--Domer48'fenian' 15:08, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Killings at Coolacrease. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Misplaced Pages:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.--Domer48 (talk) 15:52, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
What's sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander.
Please read WP:3RR as your edits while being disruptive could also been seen as edit warring. Please stop now. --Domer48 (talk) 16:09, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
3 RR
Your recent editing history at Killings at Coolacrease shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. BigDunc 17:36, 28 July 2009 (UTC)