Revision as of 06:51, 30 July 2009 editRyulong (talk | contribs)218,132 edits stop this disruption← Previous edit | Revision as of 06:52, 30 July 2009 edit undoRyulong (talk | contribs)218,132 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
::::This page is for discussing ] → ], please do not make references to other pages. please review ] if you are unclear on wikipedia guidelines and policies.] (]) 05:45, 30 July 2009 (UTC) | ::::This page is for discussing ] → ], please do not make references to other pages. please review ] if you are unclear on wikipedia guidelines and policies.] (]) 05:45, 30 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
:::::Drop the act. You know very well why you want to move this page. You are thinking "Well, if it can't be 'Masked Rider' then this can't be 'Hurricaneger'."—] (]) 05:47, 30 July 2009 (UTC) | :::::Drop the act. You know very well why you want to move this page. You are thinking "Well, if it can't be 'Masked Rider' then this can't be 'Hurricaneger'."—] (]) 05:47, 30 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
{{discussion bottom}} | |||
RYULONG YOU ARE COMMITTING A ] VIOLATION. CEASE IMMEDIATELY. | |||
DO NOT EDIT THE CONTENTS OF MY COMMENTS. | |||
==Requested move== | |||
{{movereq|Ninpuu Sentai Hurricanger}} | |||
] → ] — The common name for this is hurricanger. This is clearly shown in a google search for each version of this name. It is compounded by the fact that if you type 'hurricaneger' into google it asks you if you meant 'hurricanger'. ] (]) 01:24, 30 July 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 06:52, 30 July 2009
Tokusatsu Unassessed | ||||||||||
|
Japan Start‑class | |||||||||||||||||
|
It
- as they are attempting to evoke "It".
Can someone tell me what the heck is "it"? If this is restored, can someone tell me what this evil org. is trying to do? "It" is not acceptable. hbdragon88 (talk) 17:51, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
Requested move
Ninpuu Sentai Hurricaneger → Ninpuu Sentai Hurricanger — The common name for this is hurricanger. This is clearly shown in a google search for each version of this name. It is compounded by the fact that if you type 'hurricaneger' into google it asks you if you meant 'hurricanger'. Drag-5 (talk) 01:24, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
- Okay. This is just getting really fucking disruptive. The name "HURRICANEGER" is in the opening credits sequence, and there is no prior standard for the names. Now you are actively trying to disrupt Misplaced Pages by pointing out the disparity between the existence of "Masked Rider" in Kamen Rider Series logos and the fact that "Hurricanger" was for the longest time the more common reading.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 04:26, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
- Requesting a move is not disruptive. removing other peoples comments and attempting to block normal wikipedia procedures is disruptive. If you oppose the move, then please provide good reasons backed up by wikipedia policy, guidelines and supporting evidence. I have stated clear and logical justification for a move that satisfies all relevant criteria. Drag-5 (talk) 05:33, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
- Requesting that this particular page be moved to the more common title in the fan community over the usage of the official romanization when another requested move you made for the exact opposite reasons on another article is failing is indeed disrupting Misplaced Pages to make a point.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 05:34, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
- This page is for discussing Ninpuu Sentai Hurricaneger → Ninpuu Sentai Hurricanger, please do not make references to other pages. please review Misplaced Pages:Naming_conventions if you are unclear on wikipedia guidelines and policies.Drag-5 (talk) 05:45, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
- Drop the act. You know very well why you want to move this page. You are thinking "Well, if it can't be 'Masked Rider' then this can't be 'Hurricaneger'."—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 05:47, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
- This page is for discussing Ninpuu Sentai Hurricaneger → Ninpuu Sentai Hurricanger, please do not make references to other pages. please review Misplaced Pages:Naming_conventions if you are unclear on wikipedia guidelines and policies.Drag-5 (talk) 05:45, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
- Requesting that this particular page be moved to the more common title in the fan community over the usage of the official romanization when another requested move you made for the exact opposite reasons on another article is failing is indeed disrupting Misplaced Pages to make a point.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 05:34, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
- Requesting a move is not disruptive. removing other peoples comments and attempting to block normal wikipedia procedures is disruptive. If you oppose the move, then please provide good reasons backed up by wikipedia policy, guidelines and supporting evidence. I have stated clear and logical justification for a move that satisfies all relevant criteria. Drag-5 (talk) 05:33, 30 July 2009 (UTC)